House Bill 5509 as enrolled
Public Act 346 of 2000
Second Analysis (1-8-01)
Sponsor: Rep. Tony Stamas
House Committee: Conservation and
Outdoor Recreation
Senate Committee: Economic Development,
International Trade and Regulatory
Affairs
THE APPARENT PROBLEM:
Current law provides for the regulation of carnival and amusement rides under the Carnival-Amusement Safety Act of 1966. While these regulations provide for the inspection of such rides for safety purposes and to check the structural soundness of the rides, there are no regulations outlining the responsibility of patrons. Operators of such rides report that they face an ongoing and increasing problem from lawsuits by individuals who claim to have been injured while riding carnival or amusement rides. According to operators, many of these injuries may be due to the patron's failure to obey the safety rules for the ride or are simply fraudulent. What is needed, say operators, is legislation that would both place some responsibility for obeying the safety rules on patrons and that would ensure that if injuries occur they are promptly reported.
THE CONTENT OF THE BILL:
The bill would amend the Carnival-Amusement Safety Act to add language specifying responsibilities of riders and operators of carnival or amusement rides.
Rider responsibilities. The bill would require the rider of an amusement ride to adhere to certain requirements. However, the bill would also specify that the existing penalties for violating the act's provisions (which currently applies only to operators of amusement rides) would not apply to a rider or a rider's parent or guardian. ("Rider" would be defined to mean a person waiting in the immediate vicinity of a ride to get on the ride, as well as a person using the ride, getting on or off the ride, or leaving a ride but still in the immediate vicinity.)
At a minimum, a rider would have to do all of the following:
In addition, a rider could not get on or attempt to get on a ride unless the rider (or his or her parent or guardian) reasonably determined that the rider:
Reporting injuries. Before leaving the operator's premises, a rider (or his or her parent or guardian) would be required to report in writing to the operator or an employee, on a form provided by the operator or employee, any injury sustained on the rider. The report would have to include the injured person's name, address, and telephone number; a brief description of the incident, the injury claimed, and the location, date, and time of the injury; the cause of the injury, if known; and the name, address, and telephone number of any witness. If the rider or his or her parent or guardian was unable to file a report because of the severity of the injury, the report would have to be filed as soon as reasonably possible.
Failure to file a report under this provision would not affect the rider's right to bring a civil action related to the incident.
Operator responsibilities. The bill would require the operator of a carnival or amusement ride to display signs indicating the applicable rider safety responsibilities listed in the bill and the location of stations to report injuries (signs would have to be posted at stations for reporting injuries, first aid stations, at every ride, and at from two to four other locations on the premises [depending on the number of entrances or exits for riders], including any entrance or exit most commonly used by riders).
In addition, the bill would require a sign to be posted at each carnival ride, prominently displayed at a conspicuous location, clearly visible to the public, and bold and legible in design. Each sign would have to include operational instructions, safety guidelines for riders, restrictions on the use of the ride, behavior or activities that are prohibited, and a legend that states:
State law requires riders to obey all warnings and directions for carnival or amusement rides and behave in a manner that will not cause or contribute to the injury or themselves or others. Riders must report injuries prior to leaving the premises.
The bill would take effect on March 28, 2001.
MCL 408.652 et al.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
According to the House Fiscal Agency, the Department of Consumer and Industry Services believes that the bill could require adjustments in inspector staffing assignments to monitor the new signage requirements, leading to an indeterminate increase in state costs. (1-10-01)
ARGUMENTS:
For:
According to proponents of the bill, as many as 16 other states have some form of rider safety regulations. Adopting these regulations in Michigan will help to ensure the safety of patrons and help to protect amusement ride owners in lawsuits by encouraging more prompt notice of injuries. Many times when a lawsuit is filed against an amusement ride operator, the filing of the lawsuit is the first notice they have that an injury occurred. By this time it is difficult for the operator to fully investigate what allegedly occurred. Requiring the injured party to promptly report an injury will allow an operator to promptly investigate and discuss the incident with witnesses while it is still fresh in their minds. Not only will this help the operator to prepare a defense, this may also help to discourage fraudulent claims by creating the implication that, if the alleged injury was not reported, it may not have occurred.
In addition, requiring that safety guidelines be posted and that patrons follow those guidelines may help to eliminate the risk of some injuries. This is particularly true, given that the federal government's Consumer Product Safety Commission has reported that as many as 70 percent of amusement ride incidents are caused by patrons.
Analyst: W. Flory