No. 28

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOURNAL

OF THE

House of Representatives

90th Legislature


REGULAR SESSION OF 1999


House Chamber, Lansing, Thursday, March 25, 1999.

 

12:01 a.m.

 

The House was called to order by the Speaker Pro Tempore.

 

The roll was called by the Clerk of the House of Representatives, who announced that a quorum was present.

 

 

Allen--present

Baird--present

Basham--present

Birkholz--present

Bisbee--present

Bishop--present

Bogardus--present

Bovin--present

Bradstreet--present

Brater--present

Brewer--present

Brown, Bob--present

Brown, Cameron--present

Byl--present

Callahan--present

Cassis--present

Caul--present

Cherry--present

Clark--present

Clarke--present

Daniels--present

DeHart--present

Dennis--present

DeRossett--present

DeVuyst--present

DeWeese--present

Ehardt--present

Faunce--present

Frank--present

Garcia--present

Garza--present

Geiger--present

Gieleghem--present

Gilbert--present

Godchaux--present

Gosselin--present

Green--present

Hager--present

Hale--present

Hanley--present

Hansen--present

Hardman--present

Hart--present

Howell--present

Jacobs--present

Jamnick--present

Jansen--present

Jelinek--present

Jellema--present

Johnson, Rick--present

Johnson, Ruth--present

Julian--present

Kelly--present

Kilpatrick--present

Koetje--present

Kowall--present

Kuipers--present

Kukuk--present

LaForge--present

LaSata--present

Law--present

Lemmons--present

Lockwood--present

Mans--present

Martinez--present

Mead--present

Middaugh--present

Minore--present

Mortimer--present

Neumann--present

O'Neil--present

Pappageorge--present

Patterson--present

Perricone--present

Pestka--present

Price--present

Prusi--present

Pumford--present

Quarles--present

Raczkowski--present

Reeves--present

Richardville--present

Richner--present

Rison--present

Rivet--present

Rocca--present

Sanborn--present

Schauer--present

Schermesser--present

Scott--present

Scranton--present

Shackleton--present

Sheltrown--present

Shulman--present

Spade--present

Stallworth--present

Stamas--present

Switalski--present

Tabor--present

Tesanovich--present

Thomas--present

Toy--present

Vander Roest--present

Van Woerkom--present

Vaughn--present

Vear--present

Voorhees--present

Wojno--present

Woodward--present

Woronchak--present

 

 

e/d/s = entered during session

Rep. David Mead, from the 101st District, offered the following invocation:

 

"Dear Heavenly and Most Merciful Father, we give You thanks for all the gifts that You bestow upon us. We give You thanks for living in the greatest country in this world. We give You thanks for living in the greatest state in this country. We give You thanks for the opportunity to serve, and we ask You to guide our decisions with wisdom. We also ask You at this moment to be with our men and women who are serving this great country in the perils that face them in the days ahead. Again, we ask You to guide us in our decisions as we start this new day. We ask all these things through Christ our Lord. Amen."

 

 

Second Reading of Bills

 

 

House Bill No. 4302, entitled

A bill to make appropriations for the state institutions of higher education and certain state purposes related to education for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000; to provide for the expenditures of those appropriations; and to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state departments, institutions, agencies, employees and officers.

(The bill was read a second time, substitute (H-1) and amendments adopted and bill postponed for the day on March 24, see House Journal No. 27, p. 499.)

 

Rep. Dennis moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 21, following line 12, by inserting:

"(c) The Michigan merit award shall not be considered when determining eligibility for other state financial aid.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Dennis,

Rep. Dennis demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Dennis,

The amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 198 Yeas--70

 

 
BairdFrankLockwoodScott
BashamGieleghemMansScranton
BisbeeGilbertMartinezShackleton
BogardusHagerMiddaughSheltrown
BovinHaleMinoreShulman
BraterHanleyNeumannSpade
BrewerHansenO'NeilStallworth
Brown, B.HardmanPattersonSwitalski
CallahanHartPestkaTesanovich
CherryHowellPriceThomas
ClarkJacobsPrusiVan Woerkom
ClarkeJamnickQuarlesVander Roest
DanielsJulianReevesVaughn
DeHartKellyRisonVear
DennisKilpatrickRivetVoorhees
DeWeeseKowallSchauerWojno
EhardtLaForgeSchermesserWoodward

Faunce Lemmons

 

 

Nays--39

 

 
AllenGarciaKoetjeRaczkowski
BirkholzGeigerKuipersRichardville
BishopGodchauxKukukRichner
BradstreetGosselinLaSataRocca
Brown, C.GreenLawSanborn
BylJansenMeadStamas
CassisJelinekMortimerTabor
CaulJellemaPappageorgeToy
DeRossettJohnson, RickPerriconeWoronchak
DeVuystJohnson, RuthPumford

 

 

In The Chair: Birkholz

 

 

Rep. Frank moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 35, following line 3, by inserting:

"Enacting section 1. This act does not take effect unless House Bill No. 4430 is enacted into law.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Frank,

Rep. Frank demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Frank,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 199 Yeas--51

 

 
BairdDennisLockwoodSchauer
BashamFrankMansSchermesser
BogardusGarzaMartinezScott
BovinGieleghemMinoreSheltrown
BraterHaleNeumannSpade
BrewerHanleyO'NeilStallworth
Brown, B.HansenPestkaSwitalski
CallahanHardmanPriceTesanovich
CherryJacobsPrusiThomas
ClarkJamnickQuarlesVaughn
ClarkeKellyReevesWojno
DanielsKilpatrickRisonWoodward
DeHartLemmonsRivet

 

 

Nays--58

 

 
AllenGeigerKowallRichner
BirkholzGilbertKuipersRocca
BisbeeGodchauxKukukSanborn
BishopGosselinLaSataScranton
BradstreetGreenLawShackleton
Brown, C.HagerMeadShulman
BylHartMiddaughStamas
CassisHowellMortimerTabor
CaulJansenPappageorgeToy
DeRossettJelinekPattersonVan Woerkom
DeVuystJellemaPerriconeVander Roest
DeWeeseJohnson, RickPumfordVear
EhardtJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVoorhees
FaunceJulianRichardvilleWoronchak

Garcia Koetje

 

 

In The Chair: Birkholz

Rep. Price moved to amend the bill as follows:

1. Amend page 5, line 10, by striking out "31,025,108" and inserting "31,490,477".

2. Amend page 5, line 11, by striking out "26,684,394" and inserting "27,084,666".

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Price,

Rep. Price demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Price,

The amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 200 Yeas--57

 

 
BairdEhardtKilpatrickRison
BashamFaunceLaForgeRivet
BogardusFrankLemmonsSchauer
BovinGarciaLockwoodSchermesser
BradstreetGieleghemMansScott
BraterGreenMartinezSheltrown
BrewerHaleMinoreSpade
Brown, B.HanleyNeumannStallworth
CallahanHansenO'NeilSwitalski
CherryHardmanPestkaTesanovich
ClarkJacobsPriceThomas
ClarkeJamnickPrusiVaughn
DanielsJulianQuarlesWojno
DeHartKellyReevesWoodward

Dennis

 

 

Nays--51

 

 
AllenGodchauxKukukSanborn
BirkholzGosselinLaSataScranton
BisbeeHagerMeadShackleton
BishopHartMiddaughShulman
Brown, C.HowellMortimerStamas
BylJansenPappageorgeTabor
CassisJelinekPattersonToy
CaulJellemaPerriconeVan Woerkom
DeRossettJohnson, RickPumfordVander Roest
DeVuystJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVear
DeWeeseKoetjeRichardvilleVoorhees
GeigerKowallRichnerWoronchak
GilbertKuipersRocca

 

 

In The Chair: Birkholz

 

______

 

 

Reps. Richardville, DeRossett, Howell, Hager, Shackleton, Gilbert, Kowall, Van Woerkom, Tabor, Middaugh, Cameron Brown and Vander Roest, having reserved the right to explain their nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on amendment number 16 to House Bill 4302 (H-1) because there have been no funds identified at this time to support these line item additions. I understand the needs of both the Agricultural Extension Service and the Agricultural Experimental Center and will work within the budget process to find the needed resources."

 

Rep. Geiger moved to reconsider the vote by which the House adopted the amendments.

The motion prevailed, a majority of the members present voting therefor.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Price,

Rep. Price demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Price,

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 201 Yeas--54

 

 
BairdFrankLemmonsRivet
BashamGarciaLockwoodSchauer
BogardusGarzaMansSchermesser
BovinGieleghemMartinezScott
BraterHaleMinoreSheltrown
BrewerHanleyNeumannSpade
Brown, B.HansenO'NeilStallworth
CallahanHardmanPestkaSwitalski
CherryJacobsPriceTesanovich
ClarkJamnickPrusiThomas
ClarkeJulianQuarlesVaughn
DanielsKellyReevesWojno
DeHartKilpatrickRisonWoodward

Dennis LaForge

 

 

Nays--56

 

 
AllenGeigerKowallRichner
BirkholzGilbertKuipersRocca
BisbeeGodchauxKukukSanborn
BishopGosselinLaSataScranton
BradstreetGreenLawShackleton
Brown, C.HagerMeadShulman
BylHartMiddaughStamas
CassisHowellMortimerTabor
CaulJansenPappageorgeToy
DeRossettJelinekPattersonVan Woerkom
DeVuystJellemaPerriconeVander Roest
DeWeeseJohnson, RickPumfordVear
EhardtJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVoorhees
FaunceKoetjeRichardvilleWoronchak

 

 

In The Chair: Birkholz

 

______

 

 

Reps. Richardville, DeRossett, Hager, Shackleton, Gilbert, Kowall, Tabor, Faunce, Voorhees and Sanborn having reserved the right to explain their nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on amendment number 16 to House Bill 4302 (H-1) because there have been no funds identified at this time to support these line item additions. I understand the needs of both the Agricultural Extension Service and the Agricultural Experimental Center and will work within the budget process to find the needed resources."

 

Rep. Caul moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.

The motion prevailed, a majority of the members voting therefor.

Rep. Middaugh moved that the bill be placed on its immediate passage.

The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Middaugh moved that Rule 49 be suspended.

The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Third Reading of Bills

 

 

House Bill No. 4302, entitled

A bill to make appropriations for the state institutions of higher education and certain state purposes related to education for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000; to provide for the expenditures of those appropriations; and to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state departments, institutions, agencies, employees and officers.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 202 Yeas--69

 

 
AllenGeigerKukukSchauer
BairdGilbertLaSataSchermesser
BirkholzGodchauxMansScranton
BisbeeGreenMartinezShackleton
BishopHagerMeadSheltrown
BradstreetHartMiddaughShulman
BrewerHowellMortimerSpade
Brown, B.JansenNeumannStamas
Brown, C.JelinekPappageorgeSwitalski
BylJellemaPattersonTabor
CassisJohnson, RickPerriconeToy
CaulJohnson, RuthPestkaVan Woerkom
DeRossettJulianPumfordVander Roest
DeVuystKellyRaczkowskiVear
DeWeeseKoetjeRichardvilleVoorhees
EhardtKowallRoccaWojno
FaunceKuipersSanbornWoronchak

Garcia

 

 

Nays--41

 

 
BashamFrankKilpatrickReeves
BogardusGarzaLaForgeRichner
BovinGieleghemLawRison
BraterGosselinLemmonsRivet
CallahanHaleLockwoodScott
CherryHanleyMinoreStallworth
ClarkHansenO'NeilTesanovich
ClarkeHardmanPriceThomas
DanielsJacobsPrusiVaughn
DeHartJamnickQuarlesWoodward

Dennis

 

 

In The Chair: Birkholz

 

 

The question being on agreeing to the title of the bill,

Rep. Raczkowski moved to amend the title to read as follows:

A bill to make appropriations for the state institutions of higher education and certain state purposes related to education for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000; to provide for the expenditures of those appropriations; and to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state departments, institutions, agencies, employees, and officers.

The motion prevailed.

The House agreed to the title as amended.

Rep. Gosselin, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I vote 'no' on this budget because I was elected on a promise to shrink government, not grow it. The increase in the general purpose/general fund portion of this budget, the portion of the budget which comes from state taxes, exceeds the rate of inflation for the past year."

 

Rep. Raczkowski moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The question being on the motion by Rep. Raczkowski,

Rep. Kilpatrick demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the motion by Rep. Raczkowski,

The motion did not prevail, 2/3 of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 203 Yeas--59

 

 
AllenGilbertKukukRocca
BirkholzGodchauxLaSataSanborn
BisbeeGreenLawScranton
BradstreetHagerMeadShackleton
Brown, C.HartMiddaughSheltrown
BylHowellMortimerShulman
CassisJansenNeumannSpade
CaulJelinekPappageorgeStamas
DeRossettJellemaPattersonTabor
DeVuystJohnson, RickPerriconeToy
DeWeeseJohnson, RuthPestkaVan Woerkom
EhardtJulianPumfordVear
FaunceKoetjeRaczkowskiVoorhees
GarciaKowallRichardvilleWoronchak
GeigerKuipersRichner

 

 

Nays--51

 

 
BairdDeHartKilpatrickRivet
BashamDennisLaForgeSchauer
BishopFrankLemmonsSchermesser
BogardusGarzaLockwoodScott
BovinGieleghemMansStallworth
BraterGosselinMartinezSwitalski
BrewerHaleMinoreTesanovich
Brown, B.HanleyO'NeilThomas
CallahanHansenPriceVander Roest
CherryHardmanPrusiVaughn
ClarkJacobsQuarlesWojno
ClarkeJamnickReevesWoodward
DanielsKellyRison

 

 

In The Chair: Birkholz

 

______

 

 

The Speaker assumed the Chair.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Messages from the Senate

 

 

The Speaker laid before the House

Senate Bill No. 297, entitled

A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled "An act to provide a system of public instruction and elementary and secondary schools; to revise, consolidate, and clarify the laws relating to elementary and secondary education; to provide for the organization, regulation, and maintenance of schools, school districts, public school academies, and intermediate school districts; to prescribe rights, powers, duties, and privileges of schools, school districts, public school academies, and intermediate school districts; to provide for the regulation of school teachers and certain other school employees; to provide for school elections and to prescribe powers and duties with respect thereto; to provide for the levy and collection of taxes; to provide for the borrowing of money and issuance of bonds and other evidences of indebtedness; to establish a fund and provide for expenditures from that fund; to provide for and prescribe the powers and duties of certain state departments, the state board of education, and certain other boards and officials; to provide for licensure of boarding schools; to prescribe penalties; and to repeal acts and parts of acts," by amending sections 402 and 471a (MCL 380.402 and 380.471a), section 471a as amended by 1982 PA 71, and by adding part 5A and section 449.

(The bill was received from the Senate on March 23, with substitute (S-3) to the House substitute (H-8) and immediate effect given by the Senate, consideration of which, under the rules, was postponed until March 24, see House Journal No. 26, p. 456.)

The question being on concurring in the adoption of the substitute (S-3) to the House substitute (H-8) made to the bill by the Senate,

 

Rep. Perricone moved to substitute (H-18) the Senate substitute (S-3).

The motion prevailed and the substitute (H-18) was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

 

Rep. Schermesser moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 4, line 21, after "PART." by inserting "WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER APPOINTING A SCHOOL REFORM BOARD UNDER THIS PART, THE MAYOR SHALL INITIATE A FINANCIAL AUDIT OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT. THE MAYOR SHALL PROVIDE THE RESULTS OF THIS AUDIT TO THE SCHOOL REFORM BOARD.".

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

 

Rep. Stallworth moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 8, following line 24, by inserting:

"SEC. 373A. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE LEGISLATURE THAT BEGINNING IN THE 2000-2001 SCHOOL YEAR, THE PRIMARY GOAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT'S UTILIZATION OF ITS RESOURCES BE DIRECT CLASSROOM EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, AND THE PRIMARY GOAL SHALL BE THAT AT LEAST 80% OF ITS GROSS APPROPRIATION BE UTILIZED FOR THOSE SERVICES.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Stallworth,

Rep. Stallworth demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Stallworth,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 204 Yeas--48

 

 
BairdFrankLemmonsSchauer
BashamGarzaLockwoodSchermesser
BovinGieleghemMartinezScott
BraterHaleMinoreSheltrown
BrewerHanleyNeumannSpade
Brown, B.HansenPestkaStallworth
CallahanHardmanPriceSwitalski
ClarkJacobsPrusiTesanovich
ClarkeJamnickQuarlesThomas
DanielsKellyReevesVaughn
DeHartKilpatrickRisonWojno
DennisLaForgeRivetWoodward

Nays--57

 

 
AllenGilbertKowallRichner
BirkholzGodchauxKuipersRocca
BisbeeGosselinKukukSanborn
BishopGreenLaSataScranton
BradstreetHagerLawShackleton
Brown, C.HartMeadShulman
CassisHowellMiddaughStamas
CaulJansenMortimerTabor
DeRossettJelinekPappageorgeToy
DeVuystJellemaPattersonVan Woerkom
DeWeeseJohnson, RickPerriconeVander Roest
EhardtJohnson, RuthPumfordVear
FaunceJulianRaczkowskiVoorhees
GarciaKoetjeRichardvilleWoronchak

Geiger

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Stallworth moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 7, line 13, after "or" by inserting "UTILIZATION OF THE $35,000,000.00 TO BE APPROPRIATED FOR THE ELIMINATION OF SOCIAL ECONOMIC BARRIERS TO LEARNING".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Stallworth,

Rep. Stallworth demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Stallworth,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 205 Yeas--26

 

 
BairdGarzaLemmonsRison
BrewerHaleLockwoodSchauer
CherryHansenMinoreScott
ClarkHardmanPriceStallworth
ClarkeJacobsQuarlesThomas
DanielsKilpatrickReevesVaughn

Dennis LaForge

 

 

Nays--76

 

 
AllenFrankKoetjeRocca
BashamGarciaKowallSanborn
BirkholzGeigerKuipersSchermesser
BisbeeGieleghemKukukScranton
BishopGilbertLaSataShackleton
BogardusGodchauxLawSheltrown
BovinGosselinMeadShulman
BradstreetGreenMiddaughSpade
Brown, B.HagerMortimerStamas
Brown, C.HartNeumannSwitalski
CallahanHowellPappageorgeTabor
CassisJamnickPattersonToy
CaulJansenPerriconeVan Woerkom
DeHartJelinekPestkaVander Roest
DeRossettJellemaPumfordVear
DeVuystJohnson, RickRaczkowskiVoorhees
DeWeeseJohnson, RuthRichardvilleWojno
EhardtJulianRichnerWoodward
FaunceKellyRivetWoronchak

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Stallworth moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 11, line 15, after "TO" by striking out "10%" and inserting "5%".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Stallworth,

Rep. Stallworth demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Stallworth,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 206 Yeas--50

 

 
BairdFrankLockwoodSchauer
BashamGarzaMartinezSchermesser
BovinGieleghemMinoreScott
BraterHaleNeumannSheltrown
BrewerHanleyO'NeilSpade
Brown, B.HansenPestkaStallworth
CallahanHardmanPriceSwitalski
CherryJacobsPrusiTesanovich
ClarkJamnickQuarlesThomas
ClarkeKellyReevesVaughn
DanielsKilpatrickRisonWojno
DeHartLaForgeRivetWoodward

Dennis Lemmons

 

 

Nays--59

 

 
AllenGarciaKoetjeRichner
BirkholzGeigerKowallRocca
BisbeeGilbertKuipersSanborn
BishopGodchauxKukukScranton
BogardusGosselinLaSataShackleton
BradstreetGreenLawShulman
Brown, C.HagerMeadStamas
BylHartMiddaughTabor
CassisHowellMortimerToy
CaulJansenPappageorgeVan Woerkom
DeRossettJelinekPattersonVander Roest
DeVuystJellemaPerriconeVear
DeWeeseJohnson, RickPumfordVoorhees
EhardtJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiWoronchak
FaunceJulianRichardville

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

Rep. Stallworth moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 7, line 8, after "INCLUDES" by inserting "A UTILIZATION AND ALLOCATION FORMULA FOR THE $15,000,000.00 TO BE APPROPRIATED FOR CLASS SIZE REDUCTION".

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

 

Rep. Hardman moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 3, line 23, after "DUTIES" by inserting "NOT TO EXCEED "$2,500.00 MONTHLY".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hardman,

Rep. Hardman demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hardman,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 207 Yeas--45

 

 
BairdDennisLaForgeRivet
BashamGarzaLemmonsSchermesser
BovinGieleghemLockwoodScott
BraterHaleMartinezSpade
BrewerHanleyMiddaughStallworth
Brown, B.HansenMinoreSwitalski
CallahanHardmanNeumannTesanovich
CherryJacobsPrusiThomas
ClarkJamnickQuarlesVaughn
ClarkeKellyReevesWojno
DanielsKilpatrickRisonWoodward

DeHart

 

 

Nays--62

 

 
AllenGeigerKuipersRocca
BirkholzGilbertKukukSanborn
BisbeeGodchauxLaSataSchauer
BishopGosselinLawScranton
BradstreetGreenMeadShackleton
Brown, C.HagerMortimerSheltrown
BylHartO'NeilShulman
CassisHowellPappageorgeStamas
CaulJansenPattersonTabor
DeRossettJelinekPerriconeToy
DeVuystJellemaPestkaVan Woerkom
DeWeeseJohnson, RickPumfordVander Roest
EhardtJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVear
FaunceJulianRichardvilleVoorhees
FrankKoetjeRichnerWoronchak

Garcia Kowall

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Vaughn moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 2, line 13, after "CURRENT" by inserting "LOCALLY ELECTED OFFICIAL, APPOINTEE, OR AT-WILL EMPLOYEE OF ANY LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT OR".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Vaughn,

Rep. Vaughn demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Vaughn,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 208 Yeas--32

 

 
BairdDeHartKilpatrickReeves
BashamDennisLaForgeSchermesser
BraterGarzaLemmonsScott
BrewerHaleLockwoodSpade
Brown, B.HansenMartinezStallworth
ClarkHardmanMinoreSwitalski
ClarkeJacobsNeumannVaughn
DanielsKellyQuarlesWojno

 

 

Nays--70

 

 
AllenGarciaKowallRivet
BirkholzGeigerKuipersRocca
BisbeeGieleghemKukukSanborn
BishopGilbertLaSataSchauer
BogardusGodchauxLawScranton
BradstreetGosselinMeadShackleton
Brown, C.GreenMiddaughSheltrown
BylHagerMortimerShulman
CallahanHartO'NeilStamas
CassisHowellPappageorgeTabor
CaulJamnickPattersonToy
CherryJansenPerriconeVan Woerkom
DeRossettJelinekPestkaVander Roest
DeVuystJellemaPumfordVear
DeWeeseJohnson, RickRaczkowskiVoorhees
EhardtJohnson, RuthRichardvilleWoodward
FaunceJulianRichnerWoronchak

Frank Koetje

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Thomas moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 14, following line 6, by inserting:

"SEC. 377. THE ENACTMENT OF THIS PART SHALL NOT RESULT IN THE DIMINUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF STATE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT TO BE USED DIRECTLY FOR THE EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF CHILDREN. IF THE LEGISLATURE DETERMINES THAT THE ENACTMENT OF THIS PART HAS RESULTED IN SUCH A DIMINUTION OF STATE FUNDS, THE LEGISLATURE SHALL APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT TO MAKE UP THE SHORTFALL.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Thomas,

Rep. Thomas demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Thomas,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 209 Yeas--48

 

 
BairdDeHartLemmonsRivet
BashamDennisLockwoodSchauer
BogardusGarzaMartinezSchermesser
BovinGieleghemMinoreScott
BraterHaleNeumannSpade
BrewerHanleyO'NeilStallworth
Brown, B.HansenPestkaSwitalski
CallahanHardmanPriceTesanovich
CherryJacobsPrusiThomas
ClarkJamnickQuarlesVaughn
ClarkeKellyReevesWojno
DanielsKilpatrickRisonWoodward

 

 

Nays--58

 

 
AllenGilbertKuipersRocca
BirkholzGodchauxKukukSanborn
BisbeeGosselinLaSataScranton
BishopGreenLawShackleton
BradstreetHagerMeadSheltrown
Brown, C.HartMiddaughShulman
BylHowellMortimerStamas
CassisJansenPappageorgeTabor
CaulJelinekPattersonToy
DeRossettJellemaPerriconeVan Woerkom
DeVuystJohnson, RickPumfordVander Roest
DeWeeseJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVear
EhardtJulianRichardvilleVoorhees
FaunceKoetjeRichnerWoronchak

Garcia Kowall

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Reeves moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 3, line 27, after "UNTIL" by striking out the balance of the subsection and inserting "THE ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD IS REINSTATED UNDER SECTION 375, EXCEPT THAT THE ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD MAY CONTINUE TO MEET AND TO REPORT TO THE SCHOOL REFORM BOARD IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY. THE ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD SHALL CONTINUE TO HOLD SCHOOL BOARD ELECTIONS AS PROVIDED BY LAW AND SHALL CONTINUE TO EXERCISE ITS POWERS AND DUTIES UNDER SECTIONS 404B AND 415.".

2. Amend page 5, line 20, after "PROJECTS." by inserting "HOWEVER, BEFORE ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT TO EXPEND MORE THAN $500,000.00 OF PROCEEDS FROM BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OR FROM OTHER FUNDS DEDICATED TO CAPITAL PROJECTS, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SHALL SUBMIT THE CONTRACT TO THE ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR ITS APPROVAL.".

3. Amend page 9, line 21, by striking out all of section 375 and inserting:

"SEC. 375. (1) AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF 5 YEARS AFTER THE INITIAL APPOINTMENT OF A SCHOOL REFORM BOARD IN A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT UNDER THIS PART, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY IN A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT:

(A) THE ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT IS REINSTATED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT AND AS OF THAT DATE THE ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD AND ITS SECRETARY AND TREASURER SHALL AGAIN BE FULLY VESTED WITH ALL OF THE POWERS, DUTIES, AND PRIVILEGES UNDER THE LAW THAT THEY HAD BEFORE THE APPOINTMENT OF THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD.

(B) THE POWERS OF THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD APPOINTED FOR THE QUALIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT UNDER THIS PART AND OF ALL OFFICERS APPOINTED UNDER SECTION 374 SHALL CEASE.

(C) THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PART DO NOT APPLY TO THAT QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Reeves,

Rep. Reeves demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Reeves,

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 210 Yeas--50

 

 
BairdDennisLockwoodSchauer
BashamFrankMartinezSchermesser
BogardusGarzaMinoreScott
BovinGieleghemNeumannSheltrown
BraterHaleO'NeilSpade
BrewerHanleyPestkaStallworth
Brown, B.HansenPriceSwitalski
CallahanHardmanPrusiTesanovich
CherryJacobsQuarlesThomas
ClarkKellyReevesVaughn
ClarkeKilpatrickRisonWojno
DanielsLaForgeRivetWoodward

DeHart Lemmons

 

 

Nays--58

 

 
AllenGilbertKowallRichner
BirkholzGodchauxKuipersRocca
BisbeeGosselinKukukSanborn
BishopGreenLaSataScranton
BradstreetHagerLawShackleton
Brown, C.HartMeadShulman
BylHowellMiddaughStamas
CassisJamnickMortimerTabor
CaulJansenPappageorgeToy
DeRossettJelinekPattersonVan Woerkom
DeVuystJellemaPerriconeVander Roest
DeWeeseJohnson, RickPumfordVear
EhardtJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVoorhees
FaunceJulianRichardvilleWoronchak

Garcia Koetje

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Lemmons moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 4, line 5, after "BASIS" by striking out "ONLY" and inserting "AND TO EXERCISE AUTHORITY OVER AND PROVIDE FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF PROCEEDS FROM BONDED INDEBTENESS OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

2. Amend page 5, line 19, after "FUNDS," by striking out "INCLUDING" and inserting "EXCEPT FOR".

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Lemmons,

Rep. Lemmons demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Lemmons,

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 211 Yeas--48

 

 
BairdDeHartLemmonsSchauer
BashamDennisLockwoodSchermesser
BogardusGarzaMartinezScott
BovinGieleghemNeumannSheltrown
BraterHaleO'NeilSpade
BrewerHanleyPestkaStallworth
Brown, B.HansenPriceSwitalski
CallahanHardmanPrusiTesanovich
CherryJacobsQuarlesThomas
ClarkKellyReevesVaughn
ClarkeKilpatrickRisonWojno
DanielsLaForgeRivetWoodward

 

 

Nays--58

 

 
AllenGilbertKowallRichner
BirkholzGodchauxKuipersRocca
BisbeeGosselinKukukSanborn
BishopGreenLaSataScranton
BradstreetHagerLawShackleton
Brown, C.HartMeadShulman
BylHowellMiddaughStamas
CassisJamnickMortimerTabor
CaulJansenPappageorgeToy
DeRossettJelinekPattersonVan Woerkom
DeVuystJellemaPerriconeVander Roest
DeWeeseJohnson, RickPumfordVear
EhardtJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVoorhees
FaunceJulianRichardvilleWoronchak

Garcia Koetje

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Lemmons moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 1, line 7, by striking out all of subdivisions (B) and (C) and inserting:

"(B) "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT" MEANS THE CHIEF ELECTED OFFICIAL OF THE CITY, TOWNSHIP, OR VILLAGE IN WHICH A MAJORITY OF THE PUPILS OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT RESIDE.

(C) "QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT" MEANS A SCHOOL DISTRICT LOCATED IN THIS STATE.".

2. Amend page 2, line 4, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

3. Amend page 2, line 8, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

4. Amend page 2, line 11, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

5. Amend page 2, line 21, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

6. Amend page 2, line 27, after the first "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

7. Amend page 3, line 1, by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

8. Amend page 3, line 2, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

9. Amend page 3, line 4, after the first "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

10. Amend page 3, line 7, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

11. Amend page 4, line 16, after the first "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

12. Amend page 4, line 17, by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

13. Amend page 6, line 19, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

14. Amend page 7, line 19, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

15. Amend page 8, line 17, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

16. Amend page 8, line 19, after "STATE," by striking out "THE CITY" and inserting "A LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT".

17. Amend page 10, line 11, by striking out all of line 11 through "LOCATED)" on line 12 and inserting "THE _____ (TITLE OF CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT)".

18. Amend page 10, line 15, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT".

19. Amend page 11, line 3, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

20. Amend page 16, following line 9, by inserting:

"SEC. 1209. ALL POWERS AND DUTIES OF A SCHOOL BOARD AND OF ITS OFFICERS ARE SUBJECT TO PART 5A.

Sec. 1229. (1) The board of a school district, other than a school district that was organized as a primary school district during the 1995-1996 school year, or intermediate school district shall employ a superintendent of schools, who shall meet the requirements of section 1246. The superintendent shall not be a member of the board. Employment of a superintendent shall be by written contract. The term of the superintendent's contract shall be fixed by the board, not to exceed 5 years. If written notice of nonrenewal of the contract of a superintendent is not given at least 90 days before the termination of the contract, the contract is renewed for an additional 1-year period.

(2) The board of a school district or intermediate school district may employ assistant superintendents, principals, assistant principals, guidance directors, and other administrators who do not assume tenure in that position under Act No. 4 of the Public Acts of the Extra Session of 1937, being sections 38.71 to 38.191 of the Michigan Compiled Laws 1937 (EX SESS) PA 4, MCL 38.71 TO 38.191. The employment shall be by written contract. The term of the employment contract shall be fixed by the board, not to exceed 3 years. The board shall prescribe the duties of a person described in this subsection. If written notice of nonrenewal of the contract of a person described in this subsection is not given at least 60 days before the termination date of the contract, the contract is renewed for an additional 1-year period.

(3) A notification of nonrenewal of contract of a person described in subsection (2) may be given only for a reason that is not arbitrary or capricious. The board shall not issue a notice of nonrenewal under this section unless the affected person has been provided with not less than 30 days' advance notice that the board is considering the nonrenewal together with a written statement of the reasons the board is considering the nonrenewal. After the issuance of the written statement, but before the nonrenewal statement is issued, the affected person shall be given the opportunity to meet with not less than a majority of the board to discuss the reasons stated in the written statement. The meeting shall be open to the public or a closed session, as the affected person elects under section 8 of the open meetings act, Act No. 267 of the Public Acts of 1976, being section 15.268 of the Michigan Compiled Laws 1976 PA 267, MCL 15.268. If the board fails to provide for a meeting with the board, or if a court finds that the reason for nonrenewal is arbitrary or capricious, the affected person's contract is renewed for an additional 1-year period. This subsection does not apply to the nonrenewal of the contract of a superintendent of schools described in subsection (1).

(4) THE EMPLOYMENT AND THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS OF ALL SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PART 5A.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Lemmons,

Rep. Lemmons demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Lemmons,

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 212 Yeas--17

 

 
BrewerHaleLaForgeScott
ClarkHardmanLemmonsStallworth
ClarkeKellyReevesThomas
DanielsKilpatrickRisonVaughn

Garza

 

 

Nays--87

 

 
AllenFaunceKukukRocca
BashamGarciaLaSataSanborn
BirkholzGeigerLawSchauer
BisbeeGieleghemLockwoodSchermesser
BishopGilbertMeadScranton
BogardusGodchauxMiddaughShackleton
BovinGosselinMinoreSheltrown
BradstreetGreenMortimerShulman
BraterHagerNeumannSpade
Brown, B.HansenO'NeilStamas
Brown, C.HartPappageorgeSwitalski
BylHowellPattersonTabor
CallahanJacobsPerriconeTesanovich
CassisJamnickPestkaToy
CaulJansenPriceVan Woerkom
CherryJelinekPrusiVander Roest
DeHartJellemaPumfordVear
DennisJohnson, RuthQuarlesVoorhees
DeRossettJulianRaczkowskiWojno
DeVuystKoetjeRichardvilleWoodward
DeWeeseKowallRichnerWoronchak
EhardtKuipersRivet

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Lemmons moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 2, line 2, after "6" by inserting "THAT HAS ELECTED TO BECOME A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 377".

2. Amend page 3, line 24, after "BEGINNING" by striking out the balance of the line through "PART" on line 25 and inserting "10 DAYS AFTER THE QUESTION SUBMITTED UNDER SECTION 377 IS APPROVED BY THE SCHOOL ELECTORS AND THOSE ELECTION RESULTS ARE CERTIFIED".

3. Amend page 4, line 11, after "BEGINNING" by striking out the balance of the line through "PART" on line 12 and inserting "10 DAYS AFTER THE QUESTION SUBMITTED UNDER SECTION 377 IS APPROVED BY THE SCHOOL ELECTORS AND THOSE ELECTION RESULTS ARE CERTIFIED".

4. Amend page 6, line 14, after "BEGINNING" by striking out the balance of the line through "PART" on line 15 and inserting "10 DAYS AFTER THE QUESTION SUBMITTED UNDER SECTION 377 IS APPROVED BY THE SCHOOL ELECTORS AND THOSE ELECTION RESULTS ARE CERTIFIED".

5. Amend page 14, following line 6, by inserting:

"SEC. 377. (1) A FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT IS NOT A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT UNDER THIS PART, AND THIS PART DOES NOT APPLY TO THE FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT, UNLESS THE QUESTION OF BECOMING A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT IS APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF THE SCHOOL ELECTORS OF THAT FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT VOTING ON THE QUESTION. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF A FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL SUBMIT THE QUESTION OF BECOMING A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT TO THE SCHOOL ELECTORS OF THE FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT AT A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD NOT LESS THAN 60 AND NOT MORE THAN 90 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS PART. THE QUESTION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE FOLLOWING FORM:

"SHALL ____________________ (INSERT NAME OF FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT) BECOME A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT UNDER PART 5A OF THE REVISED SCHOOL CODE, WHICH WOULD PROVIDE FOR A MAYORAL-APPOINTED REFORM SCHOOL BOARD IN PLACE OF THE ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD?

YES ( )

NO ( )".

(2) IF A MAJORITY OF THE SCHOOL ELECTORS OF A FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT VOTING ON THE QUESTION UNDER SUBSECTION (1) VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE QUESTION, THE FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT IS A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND THIS PART IS APPLICABLE TO THE FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT, UPON CERTIFICATION OF THE ELECTION RESULTS.

(3) THIS STATE SHALL REIMBURSE A FIRST CLASS SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE COSTS OF THE SPECIAL ELECTION REQUIRED UNDER THIS SECTION.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Lemmons,

Rep. Lemmons demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Lemmons,

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 213 Yeas--50

 

 
BairdDennisLockwoodSchauer
BashamGarzaMartinezSchermesser
BogardusGieleghemMinoreScott
BovinHaleNeumannSheltrown
BraterHanleyO'NeilSpade
BrewerHansenPestkaStallworth
Brown, B.HardmanPriceSwitalski
CallahanJacobsPrusiTesanovich
CherryJamnickQuarlesThomas
ClarkKellyReevesVaughn
ClarkeKilpatrickRisonWojno
DanielsLaForgeRivetWoodward

DeHart Lemmons

 

 

Nays--57

 

 
AllenGilbertKowallRichner
BirkholzGodchauxKuipersRocca
BisbeeGosselinKukukSanborn
BishopGreenLaSataScranton
BradstreetHagerLawShackleton
Brown, C.HartMeadShulman
CassisHowellMiddaughStamas
CaulJansenMortimerTabor
DeRossettJelinekPappageorgeToy
DeVuystJellemaPattersonVan Woerkom
DeWeeseJohnson, RickPerriconeVander Roest
EhardtJohnson, RuthPumfordVear
FaunceJulianRaczkowskiVoorhees
GarciaKoetjeRichardvilleWoronchak

Geiger

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

Rep. Lemmons moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 1, line 7, by striking out all of subdivision (B) and relettering the remaining subdivision.

2. Amend page 2, line 4, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

3. Amend page 2, line 8, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

4. Amend page 2, line 11, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

5. Amend page 2, line 21, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

6. Amend page 2, line 27, after the first "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

7. Amend page 3, line 1, by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

8. Amend page 3, line 2, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

9. Amend page 3, line 4, after the first "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

10. Amend page 3, line 7, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

11. Amend page 4, line 16, after the first "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

12. Amend page 4, line 17, by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

13. Amend page 6, line 19, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

14. Amend page 7, line 19, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

15. Amend page 8, line 17, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR,".

16. Amend page 10, line 11, after the first "THE" by striking out the balance of the line through "LOCATED)" on line 12 and inserting "STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION".

17. Amend page 10, line 15, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

18. Amend page 11, line 3, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "STATE BOARD".

The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.

 

Rep. Lemmons moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 1, line 7, by striking out all of subdivision (B) and relettering the remaining subdivision.

2. Amend page 2, line 4, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

3. Amend page 2, line 8, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

4. Amend page 2, line 11, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

5. Amend page 2, line 21, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

6. Amend page 2, line 27, after the first "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

7. Amend page 3, line 1, by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

8. Amend page 3, line 2, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

9. Amend page 3, line 4, after the first "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

10. Amend page 3, line 7, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

11. Amend page 4, line 16, after the first "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

12. Amend page 4, line 17, by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

13. Amend page 6, line 19, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

14. Amend page 7, line 19, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR,".

15. Amend page 8, line 17, after "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

16. Amend page 10, line 11, after the first "THE" by striking out the balance of the line through "LOCATED)" on line 12 and inserting "GOVERNOR".

17. Amend page 10, line 15, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

18. Amend page 11, line 3, after the second "THE" by striking out "MAYOR" and inserting "GOVERNOR".

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Lemmons,

Rep. Lemmons demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Lemmons,

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 214 Yeas--5

 

 

Kilpatrick Perricone Vander Roest Vaughn

Patterson

 

 

Nays--103

 

 
AllenFaunceKoetjeRison
BairdFrankKowallRivet
BashamGarciaKuipersRocca
BirkholzGarzaKukukSanborn
BisbeeGeigerLaForgeSchauer
BishopGieleghemLaSataSchermesser
BogardusGilbertLawScott
BovinGodchauxLemmonsScranton
BradstreetGosselinLockwoodShackleton
BraterGreenMartinezSheltrown
BrewerHagerMeadShulman
Brown, B.HaleMiddaughSpade
Brown, C.HanleyMinoreStallworth
BylHansenMortimerStamas
CallahanHardmanNeumannSwitalski
CassisHartO'NeilTabor
CaulHowellPappageorgeTesanovich
CherryJacobsPestkaThomas
ClarkJamnickPriceToy
DanielsJansenPrusiVan Woerkom
DeHartJelinekPumfordVear
DennisJellemaQuarlesVoorhees
DeRossettJohnson, RickRaczkowskiWojno
DeVuystJohnson, RuthReevesWoodward
DeWeeseJulianRichardvilleWoronchak
EhardtKellyRichner

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Hale moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 16, following line 9, by inserting:

"SEC. 502A. REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF CONTRACTS ALREADY ISSUED FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMIES UNDER THIS PART, BEGINNING ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDATORY ACT THAT ADDED PART 5A, AN AUTHORIZING BODY SHALL NOT ISSUE A NEW CONTRACT FOR A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY TO OPERATE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF A SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT IS A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT UNDER PART 5A.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

Rep. Hale demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 215 Yeas--48

 

 
BairdDennisLemmonsRivet
BashamFrankLockwoodSchauer
BogardusGarzaMinoreSchermesser
BovinGieleghemNeumannScott
BraterHaleO'NeilSpade
BrewerHanleyPestkaStallworth
CallahanHansenPriceSwitalski
CherryHardmanPrusiTesanovich
ClarkJacobsPumfordThomas
ClarkeJamnickQuarlesVaughn
DanielsKellyReevesWojno
DeHartLaForgeRisonWoodward

Nays--60

 

 
AllenGarciaKilpatrickRichner
BirkholzGeigerKoetjeRocca
BisbeeGilbertKowallSanborn
BishopGodchauxKuipersScranton
BradstreetGosselinKukukShackleton
Brown, B.GreenLaSataSheltrown
Brown, C.HagerLawShulman
BylHartMeadStamas
CassisHowellMiddaughTabor
CaulJansenMortimerToy
DeRossettJelinekPappageorgeVan Woerkom
DeVuystJellemaPattersonVander Roest
DeWeeseJohnson, RickPerriconeVear
EhardtJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVoorhees
FaunceJulianRichardvilleWoronchak

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Hale moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 8, following line 24, by inserting:

"SEC. 373A. NOT LATER THAN 2 YEARS AFTER APPOINTMENT OF A REFORM SCHOOL BOARD UNDER THIS PART, THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD SHALL DEVELOP AND FINALIZE PROPOSED PLANS FOR 10 TO 20 NEW SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND SUBMIT THOSE PROPOSED PLANS TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD CREATED IN SECTION 376 ALONG WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ON EXISTING RESOURCES THAT COULD BE USED AND ADDITIONAL RESOURCES NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW SCHOOL BUILDINGS.".

2. Amend page 13, following line 21, by inserting:

"(D) NOT LATER THAN 6 MONTHS AFTER RECEIVING THE PROPOSED PLANS UNDER SECTION 373A, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD SHALL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE GOVERNOR FOR ADDITIONAL RESOURCES NEEDED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED NEW SCHOOL BUILDINGS.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Hale,

Rep. Hale demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Hale,

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 216 Yeas--26

 

 
BairdGarzaLaForgeRivet
BraterHaleLemmonsScott
BrewerHardmanMinoreStallworth
Brown, B.JacobsQuarlesSwitalski
ClarkJamnickReevesThomas
ClarkeKellyRisonVaughn

Daniels Kilpatrick

 

 

Nays--77

 

 
AllenGarciaKuipersRocca
BashamGeigerKukukSanborn
BirkholzGieleghemLaSataSchauer
BisbeeGilbertLawSchermesser
BishopGodchauxLockwoodScranton
BogardusGosselinMeadShackleton
BovinGreenMiddaughSheltrown
BradstreetHagerMortimerShulman
Brown, C.HansenNeumannSpade
BylHartO'NeilStamas
CallahanHowellPappageorgeTabor
CassisJansenPattersonToy
CaulJelinekPerriconeVan Woerkom
DeHartJellemaPestkaVander Roest
DennisJohnson, RickPrusiVear
DeRossettJohnson, RuthPumfordVoorhees
DeVuystJulianRaczkowskiWojno
DeWeeseKoetjeRichardvilleWoodward
EhardtKowallRichnerWoronchak

Faunce

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Hale moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 14, following line 6, by inserting:

"SEC. 377. THE LEGISLATURE SHALL APPROPRIATE SUFFICIENT FUNDS EACH FISCAL YEAR TO A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR ADULT EDUCATION PROGRAMS TO ENSURE THAT ADULT EDUCATION FUNDING FOR THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT IS AT LEAST AT THE SAME LEVEL AS IN THE 1995-96 STATE FISCAL YEAR.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

Rep. Hale demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 217 Yeas--37

 

 
BairdGieleghemLaForgeRison
BogardusHaleLemmonsSchauer
BraterHanleyLockwoodScott
BrewerHansenMartinezStallworth
CherryHardmanMinoreTesanovich
ClarkJacobsPriceThomas
ClarkeJamnickPrusiVaughn
DanielsKellyQuarlesWojno
DennisKilpatrickReevesWoodward

Garza

 

 

Nays--71

 

 
AllenFaunceKuipersRocca
BashamGarciaKukukSanborn
BirkholzGeigerLaSataSchermesser
BisbeeGilbertLawScranton
BishopGodchauxMeadShackleton
BovinGosselinMiddaughSheltrown
BradstreetGreenMortimerShulman
Brown, B.HagerNeumannSpade
Brown, C.HartO'NeilStamas
BylHowellPappageorgeSwitalski
CallahanJansenPattersonTabor
CassisJelinekPerriconeToy
CaulJellemaPestkaVan Woerkom
DeHartJohnson, RickPumfordVander Roest
DeRossettJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVear
DeVuystJulianRichardvilleVoorhees
DeWeeseKoetjeRichnerWoronchak
EhardtKowallRivet

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Hale moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 8, following line 24, by inserting:

"SEC. 373A. A REFORM SCHOOL BOARD APPOINTED UNDER THIS PART SHALL ADDRESS THE IMPROVEMENT OF SCHOOL GROUNDS AND OF RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES, EQUIPMENT, AND STAFF AVAILABLE ON SCHOOL GROUNDS. THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD SHALL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD CREATED IN SECTION 376 CONCERNING ADDITIONAL RESOURCES NEEDED FOR THESE IMPROVEMENTS.".

2. Amend page 13, line 21, after "REFORM" by inserting "AND TO IMPROVE THE SCHOOLS AND FACILITIES OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT".

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Hale,

Rep. Hale demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Hale,

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 218 Yeas--39

 

 
BairdDennisLaForgeRivet
BashamGarzaLemmonsSchauer
BogardusHaleLockwoodScott
BraterHanleyMartinezStallworth
BrewerHansenMinoreSwitalski
Brown, B.HardmanNeumannTesanovich
CherryJacobsO'NeilThomas
ClarkJamnickPrusiVaughn
ClarkeKellyReevesWoodward
DanielsKilpatrickRison

 

 

Nays--65

 

 
AllenGeigerKowallRocca
BirkholzGieleghemKuipersSanborn
BisbeeGilbertKukukScranton
BishopGodchauxLaSataShackleton
BovinGosselinLawSheltrown
BradstreetGreenMeadShulman
Brown, C.HagerMiddaughSpade
BylHartMortimerStamas
CallahanHowellPappageorgeTabor
CassisJansenPattersonToy
CaulJelinekPerriconeVan Woerkom
DeRossettJellemaPestkaVander Roest
DeVuystJohnson, RickPumfordVear
DeWeeseJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVoorhees
EhardtJulianRichardvilleWojno
FaunceKoetjeRichnerWoronchak

Garcia

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Hale moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 8, following line 16, by inserting:

"(9) A REFORM SCHOOL BOARD APPOINTED UNDER THIS PART SHALL ENSURE THAT SUFFICIENT TEXTBOOKS AND OTHER SUPPLIES NEEDED BY A SCHOOL OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR AN ENTIRE SCHOOL YEAR ARE ON HAND AT THE SCHOOL NOT LATER THAN 30 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE BEGINNING OF THAT SCHOOL YEAR." and renumbering the remaining subsection.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

Rep. Hale demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 219 Yeas--54

 

 
BairdDennisMartinezSchermesser
BashamFrankNeumannScott
BisbeeGieleghemO'NeilSheltrown
BogardusHalePestkaSpade
BovinHanleyPriceStallworth
BraterHansenPrusiSwitalski
BrewerHardmanPumfordTesanovich
Brown, B.JacobsQuarlesThomas
CallahanJamnickReevesVaughn
CassisKellyRisonVoorhees
ClarkKilpatrickRivetWojno
ClarkeLaForgeRoccaWoodward
DanielsLemmonsSchauerWoronchak

DeHart Lockwood

 

 

Nays--52

 

 
AllenGeigerJulianRaczkowski
BirkholzGilbertKoetjeRichardville
BishopGodchauxKowallRichner
BradstreetGosselinKuipersSanborn
Brown, C.GreenKukukScranton
BylHagerLaSataShackleton
CaulHartLawShulman
DeRossettHowellMeadStamas
DeVuystJansenMiddaughTabor
DeWeeseJelinekMortimerToy
EhardtJellemaPappageorgeVan Woerkom
FaunceJohnson, RickPattersonVander Roest
GarciaJohnson, RuthPerriconeVear

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

Rep. Hale moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 8, following line 24, by inserting:

"SEC. 373A. A REFORM SCHOOL BOARD APPOINTED UNDER THIS PART SHALL WORK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS OF THE CITY IN WHICH THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT IS LOCATED TO IDENTIFY DANGEROUS OR ABANDONED BUILDINGS LOCATED WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF THE GROUNDS OF A SCHOOL BUILDING WITHIN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD SHALL TAKE ALL MEASURES WITHIN ITS POWER TO ARRANGE FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THOSE DANGEROUS OR ABANDONED BUILDINGS.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

Rep. Hale demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

After debate,

Rep. Allen demanded the previous question.

The demand was supported.

The question being, "Shall the main question now be put?"

The previous question was ordered.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 220 Yeas--55

 

 
BairdDeVuystLockwoodSchauer
BashamFrankMartinezSchermesser
BogardusGarzaMinoreScott
BovinGieleghemNeumannSheltrown
BraterHaleO'NeilSpade
BrewerHanleyPestkaStallworth
Brown, B.HansenPriceSwitalski
CallahanHardmanPrusiTesanovich
CherryJacobsPumfordThomas
ClarkJamnickQuarlesVaughn
ClarkeKellyReevesWojno
DanielsKilpatrickRisonWoodward
DeHartLaForgeRivetWoronchak
DennisLemmonsRocca

 

 

Nays--54

 

 
AllenGeigerKoetjeRichardville
BirkholzGilbertKowallRichner
BisbeeGodchauxKuipersSanborn
BishopGosselinKukukScranton
BradstreetGreenLaSataShackleton
Brown, C.HagerLawShulman
BylHartMeadStamas
CassisHowellMiddaughTabor
CaulJansenMortimerToy
DeRossettJelinekPappageorgeVan Woerkom
DeWeeseJellemaPattersonVander Roest
EhardtJohnson, RickPerriconeVear
FaunceJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVoorhees

Garcia Julian

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

Rep. Hale moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 14, following line 6, by inserting:

"SEC. 377. THE LEGISLATURE SHALL APPROPRIATE TO A QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO ALLOW THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT TO HIRE 1,000 NEW TEACHERS FOR THE 1999-2000 SCHOOL YEAR AND TO RETAIN THESE TEACHERS THEREAFTER. A REFORM SCHOOL BOARD SHALL USE THESE FUNDS TO HIRE 1,000 NEW TEACHERS FOR THE 1999-2000 SCHOOL YEAR AND TO RETAIN THOSE TEACHERS, AND SHALL ALLOCATE THESE NEW TEACHERS TO THE SCHOOLS THAT MOST NEED ADDITIONAL TEACHERS.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

Rep. Hale demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Rep. Hale,

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 221 Yeas--26

 

 
BairdGarzaKilpatrickReeves
BraterHaleLaForgeRison
BrewerHanleyLemmonsStallworth
ClarkHardmanMartinezSwitalski
ClarkeJacobsMinoreThomas
DanielsJamnickPriceVaughn

Dennis Kelly

 

 

Nays--76

 

 
AllenGarciaKuipersRocca
BashamGeigerKukukSanborn
BirkholzGieleghemLaSataSchauer
BisbeeGilbertLawSchermesser
BishopGodchauxLockwoodScranton
BovinGosselinMeadShackleton
BradstreetGreenMiddaughSheltrown
Brown, B.HagerMortimerShulman
Brown, C.HansenNeumannSpade
BylHartO'NeilStamas
CassisHowellPappageorgeTabor
CaulJansenPattersonToy
DeHartJelinekPerriconeVan Woerkom
DeRossettJellemaPestkaVander Roest
DeVuystJohnson, RickPumfordVear
DeWeeseJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVoorhees
EhardtJulianRichardvilleWojno
FaunceKoetjeRichnerWoodward
FrankKowallRivetWoronchak

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Hale moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 2, line 21, after "MAYOR." by striking out the balance of the subsection.

2. Amend page 3, line 23, by striking out all of subsection (9) and inserting:

"(9) THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD IS THE FULL-TIME GOVERNING BODY OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT. A MEMBER OF A REFORM SCHOOL BOARD IS A FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT AND IS REQUIRED TO WORK AT LEAST 40 HOURS PER WEEK ON BEHALF OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO LEAVE POLICIES OF THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD. THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD SHALL ESTABLISH THE SALARY, BENEFITS, AND LEAVE POLICY FOR MEMBERS OF THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD. THE SALARY SHALL BE AT LEAST COMPARABLE TO THE SALARY FOR AN OFFICER APPOINTED UNDER SECTION 374. THE REFORM SCHOOL BOARD SHALL MEET REGULARLY AS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT ITS FUNCTION AS A FULL-TIME GOVERNING BODY FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.".

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Hale,

Rep. Hale demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered by Rep. Hale,

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 222 Yeas--15

 

 
BrewerKellyReevesSwitalski
DanielsKilpatrickRisonThomas
HaleLaForgeScottVaughn
HardmanLemmonsStallworth

 

 

Nays--87

 

 
AllenEhardtKoetjeRivet
BashamFaunceKowallRocca
BirkholzFrankKuipersSanborn
BisbeeGarciaKukukSchauer
BishopGarzaLaSataSchermesser
BogardusGeigerLawScranton
BovinGieleghemLockwoodShackleton
BradstreetGilbertMeadSheltrown
BraterGodchauxMiddaughShulman
Brown, B.GosselinMinoreSpade
Brown, C.HagerMortimerStamas
BylHansenO'NeilTabor
CallahanHartPappageorgeTesanovich
CassisHowellPattersonToy
CaulJacobsPerriconeVan Woerkom
CherryJamnickPestkaVander Roest
ClarkJansenPriceVear
ClarkeJelinekPumfordVoorhees
DeHartJellemaQuarlesWojno
DeRossettJohnson, RickRaczkowskiWoodward
DeVuystJohnson, RuthRichardvilleWoronchak
DeWeeseJulianRichner

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

Rep. Richner moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 6, line 9, after "FOR" by striking out "AN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT OR".

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

 

Rep. Thomas moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 2, line 18, after "374." by inserting "HOWEVER, AT LEAST A MAJORITY OF THE APPOINTED MEMBERS OF A SCHOOL REFORM BOARD MUST BE SCHOOL ELECTORS OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT.".

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Reps. Stallworth, Hardman, Reeves, Daniels, Hale and Vaughn moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), as follows:

1. Amend page 8, following line 16, by inserting:

"(9) A SCHOOL REFORM BOARD MAY ORGANIZE AND ESTABLISH COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE TEAMS TO WORK WITH THE SCHOOL REFORM BOARD TO IMPLEMENT A COHESIVE, FULL SERVICE COMMUNITY SCHOOL PROGRAM ADDRESSING THE NEEDS AND CONCERNS OF THE QUALIFYING SCHOOL DISTRICT'S POPULATION. THE SCHOOL REFORM BOARD MAY DELEGATE TO A COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE TEAM THE AUTHORITY TO DEVISE AND IMPLEMENT FAMILY, COMMUNITY, CULTURAL, AND RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES TO ASSURE THAT THE ACADEMIC MISSION OF THE SCHOOLS IS SUCCESSFUL. THE COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE TEAMS MAY ALSO DEVELOP PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES THAT FOCUS ON THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF VOLUNTARY PARENTING EDUCATION, ENHANCING PARENT AND FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN EDUCATION, AND PROMOTING ADULT AND FAMILY LITERACY." and renumbering the remaining subsection.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Reps. Stallworth, Hardman, Reeves, Daniels, Hale and Vaughn,

Rep. Stallworth demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment offered by Reps. Stallworth, Hardman, Reeves, Daniels, Hale and Vaughn,

The amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 223 Yeas--109

 

 
AllenFrankKowallRison
BairdGarciaKuipersRivet
BashamGarzaKukukRocca
BirkholzGeigerLaForgeSanborn
BisbeeGieleghemLaSataSchauer
BishopGilbertLawSchermesser
BogardusGodchauxLemmonsScott
BovinGosselinLockwoodScranton
BradstreetGreenMartinezShackleton
BraterHagerMeadSheltrown
BrewerHaleMiddaughShulman
Brown, B.HanleyMinoreSpade
Brown, C.HansenMortimerStallworth
BylHardmanNeumannStamas
CallahanHartO'NeilSwitalski
CassisHowellPappageorgeTabor
CaulJacobsPattersonTesanovich
CherryJamnickPerriconeThomas
ClarkJansenPestkaToy
ClarkeJelinekPriceVan Woerkom
DanielsJellemaPrusiVander Roest
DeHartJohnson, RickPumfordVaughn
DennisJohnson, RuthQuarlesVear
DeRossettJulianRaczkowskiVoorhees
DeVuystKellyReevesWojno
DeWeeseKilpatrickRichardvilleWoodward
EhardtKoetjeRichnerWoronchak

Faunce

 

 

Nays--0

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

 

The question being on concurring in the Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18),

The Senate substitute (S-3), as substituted (H-18), was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 224 Yeas--66

 

 
AllenFrankKowallRichner
BirkholzGarciaKuipersRocca
BisbeeGeigerKukukSanborn
BishopGilbertLaSataSchauer
BogardusGodchauxLawScranton
BradstreetGosselinLockwoodShackleton
Brown, B.GreenMeadSheltrown
Brown, C.HagerMiddaughShulman
BylHartMortimerStamas
CassisHowellPappageorgeTabor
CaulJansenPattersonToy
CherryJelinekPerriconeVan Woerkom
DeRossettJellemaPestkaVander Roest
DeVuystJohnson, RickPumfordVear
DeWeeseJohnson, RuthRaczkowskiVoorhees
EhardtJulianRichardvilleWoronchak

Faunce Koetje

 

 

Nays--43

 

 
BairdGarzaLemmonsSchermesser
BashamGieleghemMartinezScott
BovinHaleMinoreSpade
BraterHanleyNeumannStallworth
BrewerHansenO'NeilSwitalski
CallahanHardmanPriceTesanovich
ClarkJacobsPrusiThomas
ClarkeJamnickQuarlesVaughn
DanielsKellyReevesWojno
DeHartKilpatrickRisonWoodward
DennisLaForgeRivet

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

______

 

 

Rep. Scott, having reserved the right to explain her nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I will explain my "no vote" regarding Senate Bill 297. I cannot in true conscience go along with the content of this bill.

I feel that when the people speak, we should listen. Many people have lost their life for the right to vote and for this body to think that voters do not understand what this bill states is wrong in their thinking. One person who has no ties with our community should not be able to be in charge. There are too many other options.

We need to demand the best out of the school board we voted for. They have the ability to do the job, but we the taxpayers, parents, and concerned citizens need to speak clearer on what is expected. If Detroiters want to dissipate the board, we can do it ourselves, we need no one to take control over our schools, that is truly an insult. This bill is not the answer, it is a problem, an invasion of our citizens' rights, and I just cannot be a part of this ploy.

I continue to ask the question: Why is there no accountability? It's not about educating my children."

 

Rep. Basham, having reserved the right to explain his nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I cannot vote in favor of a bill that takes away the rights of voters, nor a bill that has no real reform in it. It's a sad day when a bill that affects so many never had 1 public hearing in the district that is affected."

Rep. Thomas, having reserved the right to explain his nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

It is with a heavy heart that I vote no on the substitute to SB 297. To be clear, I believe Mayor Archer will succeed and that change was necessary. However, I strongly believe we have not given him all the tools he needs and deserves to succeed. We owed him better; we owed the children of Detroit better."

 

Rep. Clark, having reserved the right to explain her nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted against this legislation (SB 297) because it violated voting rights of the people in my district."

 

Rep. Vaughn, having reserved the right to explain his nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

Since the Representatives who would dare vote to destroy local control in my city, destroy my right to vote and destroy the progress we have made in the education of our children--since these anti-democratic elements have no shame then I must be ashamed for them.

In Proverbs 29:18 the Bible says 'Where there is no vision the people perish.'

Since there is no vision in this anti-people legislation you are setting up a scenario wherein my people and my city could very well perish.

How dare you vote to take away my right to vote--How dare you vote against local control in this state--How dare you support racism and greed by sellouts who would sell me down the river for a pork chop!

You know as well as I that this bill is not about school reform. It is about what it is--a takeover to steal my school district's money and seize the 1.5 billion dollar bond issue voted for by the citizens of Detroit--now you tell them it's okay that they voted the money to rebuild their schools but they don't have the sense to know how to spend it! That's what you're saying!

I'm being sold down the river by racism, greed merchants and sellouts!

'Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased by the chains of disenfranchisement, racism, and local control--I know not what course others may face but as for me give me Liberty or give me death!'

I'm being sold down the river by Republicans and Democrats!

Now I know how the great African-American leader and patriot Malcolm X Shabazz felt when asked by the press as to whether he was a Democrat or a Republican. Malcolm X said the following:

'I am neither Democrat or Republican--I am the victim of the Democrats and I am the victim of the Republicans.'

So we've been sold out by both parties--by some whites who are practitioners of racism and some blacks who don't know the difference.

There will be NO school reform in Detroit; there will be a raiding of our resources by 'politricksters'; and money merchants. There will also be unrest. All of this fallout can be placed at the front door of the Governor and the Mayor of Detroit--the gang of 2, working hand in hand, in the same bed to disenfranchise the people of Detroit and raid our treasury.

Does all of this spell trouble for the rest of this state? You bet it does! The great African-American educator Dr. Booker T. Washington once said, 'You can't keep a man in the gutter without getting down there with him to hold him.'

You can't disenfranchise voters in Detroit and abdicate local control without that precedent affecting your own school district. What goes around comes around!

I voted no on this takeover legislation--it's unfair and un-American. Thank you!"

 

Rep. Garza, having reserved the right to explain her nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

Bill 297 does not have the reform needed to bring change in the Detroit school district."

 

Rep. Jamnick, having reserved the right to explain her nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

Thank you for your patience with all the discussion. It is not my intent to belabor this issue.

I have been asked by school boards in my district to vote against this legislation and I will.

While I am very disappointed it was felt necessary to clear the gallery, I ask we remember passing this legislation will render useless people who were elected to serve their community. What we have just experienced is simply frustration with our legislative process--something we have all felt at one time or another, but probably weren't as vocal as these people tonight.

I expect this bill will pass. I understand the Governor wants this passed. I understand the majority rules. 'If you have all the marbles,' as the saying goes, 'You make all the rules.'

Again tonight, nobody has said there are no problems in the Detroit district. I said last week and I say again tonight, there is no plan that has been explained to me for reform in the Detroit district.

It is time to move on and I'm sure we will, but are we really moving forward?"

Rep. Stallworth, having reserved the right to explain his nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I rise to oppose Senate Bill 297. Contrary to all of the public pronouncements of the benefits of a 'Detroit Public School District takeover', the legislation passed in this 90th legislative session fails to offer any direction for the improvement or delivery of the public education product in Detroit. Instead, the legislation's sole focus is the negation of the November 1998 public election for Detroit School Board members and the appointment of a new governance team by the Mayor of the City of Detroit.

Opponents of the legislation have been unfairly characterized as supporters of a failing system; when in reality they are stewards of 'checks and balances' and sound public policy. First, Michigan's Black Caucus is gravely concerned about the extension of Gubernatorial powers over local elections. The Governor continues to increase his management of state government by Executive Order thus, avoiding legislative oversight. This is exemplified by his first Executive Order of 1999 which removes 13 million dollars from the Michigan Trunkline Fund of the Michigan Department of Transportation and places it under the jurisdiction of the Michigan Renaissance Fund over which the Legislature has no authority. Concurrence of legislative members, both Republican and Democratic, in fighting further expansion of executive powers is evidenced by the growing bi-partisan support for Senate Bill 259 which restores legislative powers through amendments to Public Act 431 of 1984; the Management and Budget Act.

Beyond the expansion of executive powers, the major problem with the proposed legislation is that it is not an education bill. There is not one provision in the bill which addresses academic performance or improvement. Although touted as a bill written to address the problems of a failing school district. The bill fails to establish standards for failure, or even success. Good public policy demands tools for measurement and development of definitions for success and failure. Whether based on financial, academic, enrollment, test-taking, graduation or drop-out considerations; before any school district is deemed failing, the benchmarks of measurement must be established. In addition, any district which may find itself failing in one or more of these or other areas must be given guidance in remedial action and a timeline for implementation and improvement before outside intervention or "take-over". Lastly, any serious legislation which contemplates dealing with the very complex problems associated with an urban school district the size of Detroit must address fundamental issues such as class size, teacher recruitment, preparation and training; community policing, remedial programming, and community partnerships and social economic barriers to learning.

Specifically, I cannot support a bill written under the guise of reform that has no appropriation attached. Twice I have asked this Chamber to approve $15,000,000 for class size reduction. Twice I have asked this Chamber to approve $35,000,000 for the district to address social economic barriers to learning. Twice I have asked members of this Chamber to ensure 80% of appropriated K-12 revenue be spent on direct educational services at the classroom level. All of these requests have been denied. Therefore, I cannot believe there is a sincere interest in helping our children even though the bill sponsors have continually purported otherwise.

The entire process surrounding the development of this legislation has been one of disenfranchisement.

For the families and students of Detroit, I pray those who have been empowered honor the commitment to educate, and do not seize this opportunity to merely become physical custodians of the school district. There will be a lot of healing to do in communities throughout the City of Detroit. Our citizens have been deceived and disenfranchised. But its elected leadership has stood strong and will continue to stand against this and other unjust public policy initiatives. God willing, our children will persevere."

 

Rep. Lemmons, having reserved the right to explain his nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

Lacks any educational initiative to improve the Detroit Schools. Lacks 'accountability' because the Mayor, the State and others from any liability for any obligation or claim resulting from an action taken under the law. Fails to set any reform goals or standards for the takeover school board. Fails to discuss critical issues ie class size additional teachers etc. Eliminate local control and taxpayer participation."

 

Rep. Raczkowski moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The question being on the motion by Rep. Raczkowski,

Rep. Raczkowski demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand was supported.

The question being on the motion by Rep. Raczkowski,

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

 

 

Roll Call No. 225 Yeas--86

 

 
AllenGarzaKuipersRivet
BashamGeigerKukukRocca
BirkholzGieleghemLaSataSanborn
BisbeeGilbertLawSchauer
BishopGodchauxLockwoodSchermesser
BogardusGosselinMeadScranton
BradstreetGreenMiddaughShackleton
BrewerHagerMortimerSheltrown
Brown, B.HanleyNeumannShulman
Brown, C.HansenO'NeilSpade
BylHartPappageorgeStamas
CallahanHowellPattersonTabor
CassisJacobsPerriconeThomas
CaulJamnickPestkaToy
CherryJansenPriceVan Woerkom
DeRossettJelinekPumfordVander Roest
DeVuystJellemaQuarlesVear
DeWeeseJohnson, RickRaczkowskiVoorhees
EhardtJohnson, RuthRichardvilleWojno
FaunceJulianRichnerWoodward
FrankKoetjeRisonWoronchak

Garcia Kowall

 

 

Nays--19

 

 
BovinHaleLemmonsStallworth
ClarkHardmanMinoreSwitalski
ClarkeKellyPrusiTesanovich
DanielsKilpatrickReevesVaughn
DeHartLaForgeScott

 

 

In The Chair: Perricone

 

______

 

 

Rep. Raczkowski moved that when the House adjourns today it stand adjourned until Tuesday, April 13, at 2:00 p.m.

The motion prevailed.

 

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Motions and Resolutions

 

 

Reps. Wojno and Faunce offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 52.

A resolution offered as a memorial for Barry Goff.

Whereas, It is with a great deal of respect for his accomplishments that we join the family of Barry Goff in remembering his significant contributions to the people of the state of Michigan. Barry Goff was a man devoted to his family and committed to his community and his cherished memory will not fade from the hearts and minds of those who knew and loved him; and

Whereas, Born on January 9, 1937, Barry Goff excelled in many endeavors throughout his successful career, including business owner and community activist. As a businessman, Barry used his talent for hand-painted lettering to open Signs and Designs in Detroit in the late 1960s. He ran the business out of a studio apartment and spent most of his working hours at the businesses of his clients, painting walls, vehicles, and signs. In 1985, Goff and his wife Linda opened Sign Craft on Nine Mile Road in Warren. His client list included many candidates for local political office; and

Whereas, Barry Goff was a longtime community activist and the chief opponent of expansion of Detroit City Airport. The proposed expansion of City Airport would lead to increased safety hazards and pollution. Mr. Goff led a group of area residents concerned over the increased noise in the area, little need for the increased capacity, and taxpayer costs of the new facility. Barry Goff studied applications to the federal government, tracked environmental impact reports, and urged local politicians to defeat proposed expansions. He worked tirelessly in an effort to protect communities over which larger passenger jets would fly. Mr. Goff and airport opponents scored a major victory in 1993 when Southwest Airlines pulled passenger service out of City Airport; and

Whereas, Serving others was a well-established trait of Barry Goff. He served his nation as a member of the Air Force during the Korean War. A 28-year southwest Warren resident, Mr. Goff was elected president of the Fitzgerald Homeowners Association in 1989. He was a Master Mason, past president of the South Warren Kiwanis Club, vice-chair of the Warren Senior Advisory Council, and a representative of the Center Line Detroit City Airport Expansion Study Committee. Goff was also an active member of the Warren Lions Club. A loving family man, he and his wife Linda enjoyed a 25-year marriage. In addition to his wife, Barry is survived by 11 children, 24 grandchildren, and three great-grandchildren; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That this document is signed and dedicated to offer these words of praise as a memorial for Barry Goff. A community leader, he was much admired and will long be remembered; and be it further

Resolved, That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the Goff family as evidence of our highest esteem.

The resolution was adopted.

 

 

Reps. Wojno and Sanborn offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 53.

A resolution to memorialize the President and the Congress of the United States to save the Social Security System.

Whereas, The Social Security System is the most successful domestic program in the country's history. Without the Social Security System, nearly 50 percent of our senior citizens would be living in poverty; and

Whereas, The Social Security System also pays benefits to young survivors and spouses of workers who have died, as well as to disabled workers and their families. In fact, disability and survivors' benefits make up nearly 30 percent of all Social Security benefits paid. These benefits provide important protection for younger workers before retirement, protection that is often difficult or expensive to obtain through private insurance; and

Whereas, In 1950 there were 16 taxpaying workers for every retired person in the United States. Today there are just over three workers per retiree, and the ratio is expected to fall below two workers per retiree during the next century; and

Whereas, The Social Security System is projected to run out of money to pay the claims of retirees--whose numbers are not only expected to increase as baby boomers retire but also because of increasing life expectancy--by 2032; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That we memorialize the President and the Congress of the United States to save the Social Security System; and be it further

Resolved, That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the President of the United States Senate, and the members of the Michigan congressional delegation.

The resolution was referred to the Committee on House Oversight and Operations.

 

 

Reps. Faunce, Van Woerkom, Bradstreet, Richardville, DeRossett, Hager, Koetje, Rocca, Voorhees, Woronchak, Gosselin, LaSata, Kukuk, Hart, Kowall, Gilbert, Howell, Toy, Tabor, Jelinek, Julian, Shackleton, Allen, Patterson, Bisbee, Mortimer, Kuipers, Garcia, Shulman, Cassis and Scranton offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 54.

A resolution recognizing October 23-31, 1999 as "Red Ribbon Week" for celebrating Michigan's goal for Drug Free Youth in our state.

Whereas, The Red Ribbon Celebration is sponsored by the Board of Directors of Michigan Communities for Drug Free Youth in the State of Michigan. It is an annual event that promotes drug prevention through education with a red ribbon as a symbol of hope and a visible commitment to work for a better and safer future for our children, families, and communities; and

Whereas, This year's theme is "Color My World Drug Free." It is the hope of the House of Representatives that the State of Michigan will join its children in a visible commitment toward a drug free world. During the week of October 23, the Michigan Communities in Action for Drug Free Youth will be distributing red ribbons with this year's theme throughout the State of Michigan. This ribbon will serve as a symbol to keep open lines of communication to our children regarding the problems related to the abuse of alcohol, the dangers of tobacco, and the elimination of illegal drug use in our society; and

Whereas, It is our hope that the citizens of Michigan join with the House of Representatives, Michigan's Honorary Chairs Governor and Mrs. John Engler, and Michigan Coordinators Ritchie Coleman and Bobbie Margolis to put a red ribbon on our lapels, in our homes, our offices, our cars, and any other place to celebrate "Red Ribbon Week" during the week of October 23-31, 1999 in Michigan; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the members of this legislative body call upon the citizens of Michigan to recognize October 23-31, 1999 as Red Ribbon Week to promote a drug free Michigan; and be it further

Resolved, That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the Board of Directors of Michigan Communities for Drug Free Youth as evidence of our support for their efforts.

Pending the reference of the resolution to a committee,

Rep. Raczkowski moved that Rule 77 be suspended and the resolution be considered at this time.

The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted.

 

 

Reps. Sanborn, Wojno, Gilbert, Hager, Faunce, Van Woerkom, Richardville, Bisbee, Woronchak, Howell and Shackleton offered the following concurrent resolution:

House Concurrent Resolution No. 28.

A concurrent resolution to memorialize the President and the Congress of the United States to save the Social Security System.

Whereas, The Social Security System is the most successful domestic program in the country's history. Without the Social Security System, nearly 50 percent of our senior citizens would be living in poverty; and

Whereas, The Social Security System also pays benefits to young survivors and spouses of workers who have died, as well as to disabled workers and their families. In fact, disability and survivors' benefits make up nearly 30 percent of all Social Security benefits paid. These benefits provide important protection for younger workers before retirement, protection that is often difficult or expensive to obtain through private insurance; and

Whereas, In 1950 there were 16 taxpaying workers for every retired person in the United States. Today there are just over three workers per retiree, and the ratio is expected to fall below two workers per retiree during the next century; and

Whereas, The Social Security System is projected to run out of money to pay the claims of retirees--whose numbers are not only expected to increase as baby boomers retire but also because of increasing life expectancy--by 2032; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That we memorialize the President and the Congress of the United States to save the Social Security System; and be it further

Resolved, That a copy of this concurrent resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the President of the United States Senate, and the members of the Michigan congressional delegation.

The concurrent resolution was referred to the Committee on House Oversight and Operations.

 

 

______

 

 

Rep. Scott moved that the House adjourn.

The motion prevailed, the time being 3:25 a.m.

 

The Speaker declared the House adjourned until Tuesday, April 13, at 2:00 p.m.

 

 

GARY L. RANDALL

Clerk of the House of Representatives.