HOUSE BILL No. 4664 April 24, 2001, Introduced by Reps. Raczkowski and Vear and referred to the Committee on Civil Law and the Judiciary. A bill to amend 1970 PA 91, entitled "Child custody act of 1970," by amending section 6a (MCL 722.26a), as added by 1980 PA 434. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT: 1 Sec. 6a. (1) In A custodydisputesDISPUTE between par- 2 ents,the parents shall be advised of joint custody. At the3request of either parent, the court shall consider an award of4joint custody, and shall state on the record the reasons for5granting or denying a request. In other cases joint custody may6be considered by the court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he court shall determine whether joint LEGAL AND JOINT 8 PHYSICAL custody is in the bestinterestINTERESTS of the child 9 by considering the following factors: 10 (a) The factors enumerated in section 3. IF A PARENT 11 ATTEMPTS TO REBUT THE PRESUMPTION OF JOINT LEGAL AND JOINT PHYSI- 12 CAL CUSTODY UNDER SUBSECTION (1), THE COURT SHALL PRESUME EACH 13 FACTOR WEIGHS EVENLY FOR BOTH PARENTS UNLESS PROVEN OTHERWISE BY 14 CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE. 15 (b) Whether the parents, AND THIRD PERSONS, IF ANY, will be 16 able to cooperate and generally agree concerning important deci- 17 sions affecting the welfare of the child. IF 1 PARTY IS UNWILL- 18 ING TO COOPERATE WITH THE OTHER PARTY OR PARTIES IN TERMS OF PAR- 19 ENTING DECISIONS AND MATERIAL ISSUES AFFECTING THE CHILD'S WEL- 20 FARE, FOR NO OR LITTLE MERITORIOUS REASON, THEN THE COURT SHALL 21 CONSIDER AWARDING SOLE LEGAL AND PHYSICAL CUSTODY TO THE PARTY 22 WHO IS MORE INCLINED TO BE WILLING TO COOPERATE. 23 (4)(2)IftheA CHILD'S parents agree on joint custody, 24 the court shall award joint LEGAL AND JOINT PHYSICAL custody 25 unless the court determines on the record, based upon clear and 26 convincing evidence, that joint LEGAL AND JOINT PHYSICAL custody 27 is not in the best interests of the child. 02476'01 3 1 (5)(3)If the court awards joint LEGAL AND JOINT PHYSICAL 2 custody, the courtmaySHALL include in its award a statement 3 regarding when the child shall reside with each parent,or may4provide that physical custody be shared by the parents in a5manner to assure the child continuing contact with both parents6 AND WITH EACH THIRD PERSON, IF ANY. THE STATEMENT REGARDING THE 7 CHILD'S RESIDENTIAL SCHEDULE SHALL CONFORM TO THE DEFINITION OF 8 JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY. 9 (6)(4)During the time a child resides with a parent, 10 that parent shall decide all routine matters concerning the 11 child. 12 (7)(5)If there is a dispute regarding residency, the 13 court shall state the basis for a residency award on the record 14 or in writing. 15 (8)(6)Joint LEGAL AND JOINT PHYSICAL custodyshall16 DOES not eliminate the responsibility for child support. Each 17 parentshall beIS responsible for child support based on the 18 needs of the child and the actual resources of each parent. If a 19 parent would otherwise be unable to maintain adequate housing for 20 the child and the other parent has sufficient resources, the 21 court may order modified support payments for a portion of hous- 22 ing expenses even during a period when the child is not residing 23 in the home of the parent receiving support. HOWEVER, THE COURT 24 SHALL NOT MODIFY SUPPORT PAYMENTS BASED ON HOUSING EXPENSES 25 UNLESS THE PARENT RECEIVING THE SUPPORT PROVES BY CLEAR AND CON- 26 VINCING EVIDENCE THAT HE OR SHE IS INITIATING AGGRESSIVE MEANS TO 27 ALLEVIATE THE FINANCIALLY UNEQUAL STATUS. An order of joint LEGAL 02476'01 4 1 AND JOINT PHYSICAL custody, in and of itself,shallDOES not 2 constitute grounds for modifying a support order. 3 (9)(7)As used in this section:, "joint4 (A) "JOINT LEGAL custody" means an order of the court in 5 which1 or both of the following is specified: (a) That the6child shall reside alternately for specific periods with each of7the parents. (b) ThatTHE COURT SPECIFIES THAT the parents, AND 8 THIRD PERSONS, IF ANY, shall share decision-making authority as 9 to the important decisions affecting the welfare of the child. 10 (B) "JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY" MEANS AN ORDER OF THE COURT IN 11 WHICH THE COURT SPECIFIES THAT THE CHILD SHALL RESIDE ALTERNATELY 12 FOR SPECIFIC AND SUBSTANTIALLY EQUAL PERIODS OF TIME WITH EACH 13 PARENT, AND WITH EACH THIRD PERSON, IF ANY. 14 (10) THIS SECTION SHALL BE STRICTLY INTERPRETED. 02476'01 Final page. GWH