Summary: HB 5520 (H-1) as passed by the House FY 2004-05 JUDICIARY March 30, 2004 |
Analyst: MarilynB.Peterson
FY 2003-04 YTD (as of2/12/04) |
House |
Difference: House from FY 2003-04 YTD
|
|||||
Executive |
Senate |
Enacted |
Amount |
% |
|||
IDG/IDT |
$4,633,500 |
$4,633,500 |
$4,633,500 |
$0 |
0.0 |
||
Federal |
4,106,500 |
3,815,600 |
4,015,600 |
(90,900) |
(2.2) |
||
Local |
3,148,700 |
3,298,100 |
3,298,100 |
149,400 |
4.7 |
||
Private |
842,500 |
842,500 |
842,500 |
0 |
0.0 |
||
Restricted |
80,120,300 |
82,333,600 |
82,333,600 |
2,213,300
|
2.8 |
||
GF/GP |
160,216,400 |
158,093,300 |
158,093,300 |
(2,123,100) |
(1.3) |
||
Gross |
$253,067,900 |
$253,016,600 |
$253,216,600 |
$148,700 |
0.1 |
||
FTEs |
582.5 |
582.5 |
582.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Overview
Article VI of the State Constitution of 1963 is the basis forMichigan’s judicial branch of government. The Judiciary budget includes operational funding for the Michigan Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and related judicial agencies.. Additionally, the budget funds the salaries of justices of the Supreme Court and judges at the appeals, circuit, probate, and district levels according to constitutional and statutory requirements. Grant funding for trial court operations is provided to counties through Court Equity Fund reimbursements based on a statutory formula. Various other grant programs provide funding to trial courts and related organizations. In the enacted FY 2003-04 budget, justices’ and judges’ salaries constitute the largest portion of the Judiciary budget: 36% of the gross budget and 53% of the GF/GP budget.
Summary of FY 2004-05 Major Budget Issues
Court Fees and Assessments
Replaces $2.2 million GF/GP with additional state restricted revenue anticipated under court funding revisions that took effectOctober 1, 2003.
Judgeships
Recognizes changes in judgeships under 2001-02 session enactments; net effect of $101,700 reduction. No adjustments for judgeship changes under discussion in current session.
CourtEquity Fund Reimbursements/Judicial Technology Fund
Reduces Court Equity Fund reimbursements for local trial court operations by $1.0 million, but uses boilerplate to earmark $1.0 million of Judicial Technology Improvement Fund (funded at current-year level) for local courts.
Other Programs
Maintains FY 2003-04 funding levels for drug courts, indigent legal assistance, Michigan Judicial Institute.
New FederalGrant
House substitute adds funding for newly-approved distribution of $200,000 in federal children's justice grant funding, to be used to develop, print, and implement a written protocol and training curriculum for guardians ad litem and parents in child protection proceedings.
Major Budget Changes from FY 2003-04 YTD Appropriations: |
FY 2003-04 YTD (as of2/12/04) |
Proposed House Change |
|
1. Court Equity Fund Reimbursements Executive and proposed House: decrease line item for court equity formula grant program by $1.0 million Gross, reflecting $2.8 million GF/GP reduction offset by $1.8 million increased restricted revenue deriving from fee changes that took effectOctober 1, 2003. Associated boilerplate directs $1.0 million from the Judicial Technology Fund to counties to provide funds for court technology needs. |
Gross Restricted GF/GP |
$69,906,000 44,669,900 $25,236,100 |
($1,000,000) 1,768,900 ($2,768,900) |
2. Drug Court Grant Program Executive and proposed House: increase restricted revenues deriving from civil infraction assessments and statutory state costs in criminal cases; reduce GF/GP support by identical amount. |
Gross IDG Federal Restricted GF/GP |
$4,635,000 1,800,000 300,000 1,267,500 $1,267,500 |
$0 0 0 420,800 ($420,800) |
3. Judgeship Changes Executive and proposed House: reflect changes in costs of salaries, retirement, and social security due to changes in judgeships enacted during 2001-2002 legislative session. |
Gross Restricted GF/GP |
$86,872,100 7,090,200 $79,781,900 |
($101,700) 0 ($101,700) |
4. New FederalGrant Proposed House adds funding for newly-approved distribution of $200,000 in federal children's justice grant funding, to be used to develop, print, and implement a written protocol and training curriculum for guardians ad litem and parents in child protection proceedings. |
Gross Federal GF/GP |
$0 0 $0 |
$200,000 200,000 $0 |
5. Employee-Related Savings Executive and proposed House: unspecified savings applied to lines funding FTEs and totaling $1.5 million Gross, $1.4 million GF/GP. |
Gross Federal Local Restricted GF/GP |
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
($1,496,900) (13,100) (81,600) (11,500) ($1,390,700) |
6. Economics Executive and proposed House: economic adjustments for salaries and wages ($2.0 million Gross, $1.8 million GF/GP), insurances ($568,300 Gross, $526,600 GF/GP), retirement ($1.5 million Gross, $1.4 million GF/GP), workers' compensation ($10,000 Gross and GF/GP), and building occupancy charges ($1.2 million Gross and GF/GP). |
Gross Federal Local Restricted GF/GP |
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
$2,858,800 33,700 231,000 35,100 $2,559,000 |
Major Boilerplate Changes from FY 2003-04: |
Sec. 211. Personal Service Contracts– RETAINED House substitute retains requirement for monthly report on personal service contracts. Executive proposed to delete. |
Sec. 213. Contingency Funds– NEW Executive and House: Appropriates federal, restricted, local, and private contingency funds that can be expended upon legislative transfer to a specific line item. |
Sec. 304. Cooperation with Auditor General– RETAINED House substitute retains section requiring judicial branch to cooperate with auditor general regarding judicial branch audits. Executive proposed to delete. |
Sec. 304. CourtTechnology– NEW Executive and House: Appropriates $1.0 million from Judicial Technology Fund to counties to provide funds for court technology needs; distribution proportionate to Court Equity Fund distributions. |
Sec. 313. JudicialTechnology Improvement Fund/CSES Refund/Cyber Court– MODIFIED House retains two subsections establishing criteria for use of Judicial Technology Improvement Fund (JTIF) and explicitly allowing bill's appropriations be used for cyber court, and deletes subsection appropriating $6.0 million of the refund of federal child support enforcement system (CSES) penalties for JTIF, including $1.0 million for cyber court. Executive deletes entire section. |
Sec. 314. Mental Health Courts– RETAINED House substitute retains requirement for State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) to assist interested local courts in obtaining federal funds for mental health courts, should such funds become available. Executive proposed to delete. |
Sec. 315. Communication with DIT– RETAINED House substitute retains requirement for judicial branch to communicate with Department of Information Technology on information technology activities. Executive proposed to delete. |