BINGO ACT AMENDMENTS
Senate Bill 435
Sponsor: Sen. James Barcia
House Committee: Government Operations
Senate Committee: Economic Development, Small Business and Regulatory Reform
Complete to 6-26-06
A SUMMARY OF SENATE BILL 453 AS PASSED BY THE SENATE 6-8-06
Senate Bill 435 would amend the Bingo Act (MCL 432.103 et al.) to do the following:
· Increase the value of all prizes that may be awarded through large bingo and special bingo from $2,000 to $3,500 for a single occasion and from $500 to $1,100 for a single game.
· Require that a qualified organization that may conduct games under the act be tax-exempt under the federal Internal Revenue Code rather than the Single Business Tax Act (unless the organization has been continuously in existence for five years).
· Specify that "prizes" do not include advertising material given away by a qualified organization.
· Eliminate a provision prohibiting more than one bingo license from being issued to a qualified organization for any one day.
· Eliminate a provision prohibiting more than two bingo licenses from being issued for the same day at any one location.
· Provide that the predetermined amount for the first occasion of a progressive jackpot bingo game could not exceed $500 or half of the card sales.
· Delete a requirement that all bingo cards in progressive jackpot game shall be sold prior to the drawing of the first ball for that game.
· Specify that, on the first bingo occasion, a player could not be required to obtain bingo in less than the allowable number of calls prescribed by the commissioner. The current minimum number of calls is 50.
· Prohibit a person from receiving a commission, profit, or pay for managing or operating a raffle, except as provided by rule.
· Eliminate the $500 aggregate per-day personal limit on winnings from a millionaire party.
· Increase from $500,000 to $1 million the maximum performance bond that suppliers of equipment and tickets may be required to post.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact on the State of Michigan or local units of government.
Legislative Analyst: Mark Wolf
Fiscal Analyst: Viola Bay Wild
■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House staff for use by House members in their deliberations, and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.