HOUSE BILL No. 4935

May 13, 2009, Introduced by Reps. Coulouris, Ball, Corriveau, Johnson, Simpson, Melton, Haugh, Young, Lipton, Marleau, Mayes, Gregory, Roy Schmidt, Hansen, LeBlanc, Scripps, Meadows, Moore and Green and referred to the Committee on Health Policy.

 

     A bill to amend 1980 PA 350, entitled

 

"The nonprofit health care corporation reform act,"

 

by amending sections 401e, 402b, 608, 609, 610, 612, and 613 (MCL

 

550.1401e, 550.1402b, 550.1608, 550.1609, 550.1610, 550.1612, and

 

550.1613), section 401e as added by 1996 PA 516, section 402b as

 

amended by 1999 PA 7, section 608 as amended by 1991 PA 73, and

 

section 609 as amended by 2003 PA 59, and by adding sections 220

 

and 613a; and to repeal acts and parts of acts.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 220. A nonprofit health care corporation is subject to

 

chapter 37A of the insurance code of 1956, 1956 PA 218, MCL

 

500.3751 to 500.3781.

 

     Sec. 401e. (1) Except as provided in this section, a health

 

care corporation that has issued a nongroup certificate shall renew

 


or continue in force the certificate at the option of the

 

individual.

 

     (1) (2) Except as provided in this section, a health care

 

corporation that has issued a group certificate shall renew or

 

continue in force the certificate at the option of the sponsor of

 

the plan.

 

     (2) (3) Guaranteed renewal is not required in cases of fraud,

 

intentional misrepresentation of material fact, lack of payment, if

 

the health care corporation no longer offers that particular type

 

of coverage in the market, or if the individual or group moves

 

outside the service area.

 

     Sec. 402b. (1) For an individual covered under a nongroup

 

certificate or under a certificate not covered under subsection

 

(2), a health care corporation may exclude or limit coverage for a

 

condition only if the exclusion or limitation relates to a

 

condition for which medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment

 

was recommended or received within 6 months before enrollment and

 

the exclusion or limitation does not extend for more than 6 months

 

after the effective date of the certificate.

 

     (2) A health care corporation shall not exclude or limit

 

coverage for a preexisting condition for an individual covered

 

under a group certificate.

 

     (3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), a health care corporation

 

shall not issue a certificate to a person eligible for nongroup

 

coverage or eligible for a certificate not covered under subsection

 

(2) that excludes or limits coverage for a preexisting condition or

 

provides a waiting period if all of the following apply:

 


     (a) The person's most recent health coverage prior to applying

 

for coverage with the health care corporation was under a group

 

health plan.

 

     (b) The person was continuously covered prior to the

 

application for coverage with the health care corporation under 1

 

or more health plans for an aggregate of at least 18 months with no

 

break in coverage that exceeded 62 days.

 

     (c) The person is no longer eligible for group coverage and is

 

not eligible for medicare or medicaid.

 

     (d) The person did not lose eligibility for coverage for

 

failure to pay any required contribution or for an act to defraud a

 

health care corporation, a health insurer, or a health maintenance

 

organization.

 

     (e) If the person was eligible for continuation of health

 

coverage from that group health plan pursuant to the consolidated

 

omnibus budget reconciliation act of 1985, Public Law 99-272, 100

 

Stat. 82, he or she has elected and exhausted that coverage.

 

     (4) As used in this section, "group" means a group of 2 or

 

more subscribers.

 

     Sec. 608. (1) The rates charged to nongroup subscribers for

 

each certificate shall be filed with the commissioner and the

 

attorney general in accordance with section 610. and shall be

 

subject to the prior approval of the commissioner. Annually, the

 

commissioner shall approve, disapprove, or modify and approve the

 

proposed or existing rates for each certificate subject to the

 

standard that the rates must be determined to be equitable,

 

adequate, and not excessive, as defined in section 609. The burden

 


of proof that rates to be charged meet these standards shall be

 

upon the health care corporation proposing to use the rates. The

 

rate filing shall include an actuarial certification that the rates

 

are reasonable in relation to the benefits provided, are adequate,

 

equitable, and not excessive, and promote the health care

 

corporation's charitable and social mission obligations. The rate

 

filing shall show the anticipated loss ratio. If surplus exceeds

 

the maximum surplus permitted under section 204a(5), a contribution

 

from surplus may be considered in the determination of whether

 

rates are reasonable in relation to the benefits provided, are

 

adequate, equitable, and not excessive, and promote the health care

 

corporation's charitable and social mission obligations. A rate for

 

a nongroup or group conversion certificate shall be presumed

 

reasonable in relation to the benefits provided, is adequate,

 

equitable, and not excessive, and promotes the health care

 

corporation's charitable and social mission obligations if the

 

anticipated loss ratio equals or exceeds 80%. Anticipated loss

 

ratios for nongroup certificates shall be calculated separately

 

from anticipated loss ratios for group conversion certificates. A

 

medicare supplement rate shall be presumed reasonable in relation

 

to the benefits provided, is adequate, equitable, and not

 

excessive, and promotes the health care corporation's charitable

 

and social mission obligations if the anticipated loss ratio equals

 

or exceeds 90%. Sections 3759 to 3763 of the insurance code of

 

1956, 1956 PA 218, MCL 500.3759 to 500.3763, apply to adjusting

 

premiums for each certificate. For certificates introduced on or

 

after January 1, 2010, any premium differences among the

 


certificates shall reflect the actuarial value of the certificate

 

differences and not the underlying experience of the certificates.

 

     (2) The methodology and definitions of each rating system,

 

formula, component, and factor used to calculate rates for group

 

subscribers for each certificate, including the methodology and

 

definitions used to calculate administrative costs for

 

administrative services only and cost-plus arrangements, shall be

 

filed in accordance with section 610 and shall be are subject to

 

the prior approval of the commissioner. The definition of a group,

 

including any clustering principles applied to nongroup subscribers

 

or small group subscribers for the purpose of group formation,

 

shall be are subject to the prior approval of the commissioner.

 

However, if a Michigan caring program is created under section 436,

 

that program shall be defined as a group program for the purpose of

 

establishing rates. The commissioner shall approve, disapprove, or

 

modify and approve the methodology and definitions of each rating

 

system, formula, component, and factor for each certificate subject

 

to the standard that the resulting rates for group subscribers must

 

be determined to be equitable, adequate, and not excessive, as

 

defined in section 609. In addition, the commissioner may from time

 

to time review the records of the corporation to determine proper

 

application of a rating system, formula, component, or factor with

 

respect to any group. The corporation shall refile for approval

 

under this subsection, every 3 years, the methodology and

 

definitions of each rating system, formula, component, and factor

 

used to calculate rates for group subscribers, including the

 

methodology and definitions used to calculate administrative costs

 


for administrative services only and cost-plus arrangements. If

 

surplus exceeds the maximum surplus permitted under section

 

204a(5), a contribution from surplus may be considered in the

 

determination of whether rates are reasonable in relation to the

 

benefits provided, are adequate, equitable, and not excessive, and

 

promote the health care corporation's charitable and social mission

 

obligations. The burden of proof that the resulting rates to be

 

charged meet these standards shall be upon the health care

 

corporation proposing to use the rating system, formula, component,

 

or factor.

 

     (3) A proposed rate shall not take effect until a filing has

 

been made with the commissioner and approved under section 607 or

 

this section, as applicable, except as provided in subsections (4)

 

and (5).

 

     (4) Upon request by a health care corporation, the

 

commissioner may allow rate adjustments to become effective prior

 

to approval, for federal or state mandated benefit changes.

 

However, a filing for these adjustments shall be submitted before

 

the effective date of the mandated benefit changes. If the

 

commissioner disapproves or modifies and approves the rates, an

 

adjustment shall be made retroactive to the effective date of the

 

mandated benefit changes or additions.

 

     (5) Implementation prior to approval may be allowed if the

 

health care corporation is participating with 1 or more health care

 

corporations to underwrite a group whose employees are located in

 

several states. Upon request from the commissioner, the corporation

 

shall file with the commissioner, and the commissioner shall

 


examine, the financial arrangement, formulae, and factors. If any

 

are determined to be unacceptable, the commissioner shall take

 

appropriate action.

 

     (6) For rates submitted under subsection (1), no later than 4

 

months after the end of a 12-month rating period, the health care

 

corporation shall submit information to the commissioner and the

 

attorney general that shows the actual loss ratio for the rating

 

period for all certificates subject to that 12-month rating period,

 

including certificates that have been or will be closed to new

 

applicants. If the actual loss ratio for those certificates does

 

not equal or exceed the applicable anticipated loss ratio under

 

subsection (1), the commissioner shall order the corporation to

 

issue rate credits or refunds to individuals currently covered

 

under a certificate in that line of business in an amount that will

 

result in a minimum loss ratio for the rating period equal to the

 

applicable anticipated loss ratio for the line of business. The

 

corporation shall not be ordered to issue a refund in an amount

 

less than $25.00 per individual applicant. The rate credits or

 

refunds shall be issued no later than 90 days after the

 

commissioner's order to issue rate credits or refunds. The rate

 

credits or refunds shall include interest from the beginning of the

 

rating period to the date of the credit or refund calculated at the

 

average rate of interest for 13-week United States treasury notes,

 

as determined by the commissioner. The attorney general may bring

 

an action or apply to the circuit court for a court order to

 

enforce an order of the commissioner under this section. As used in

 

this subsection, each of the following constitutes a separate line

 


of business:

 

     (a) All certificates that are medicare supplement

 

certificates.

 

     (b) All certificates that are group conversion certificates a

 

corporation is required to offer under section 410a.

 

     (c) All nongroup certificates that are neither medicare

 

supplement nor group conversion certificates.

 

     (7) As used in this section:

 

     (a) "Actual loss ratio" means the ratio for a 12-month rating

 

period of the incurred claims to premiums.

 

     (b) "Anticipated loss ratio" means the ratio at the time of

 

the rate filing, or at a time of subsequent rate revisions, of the

 

expected future incurred claims during the rating period defined in

 

the rate filing to the future premiums, based on a credible premium

 

volume over a reasonable period of time with proper weight given to

 

rating trends and other relevant factors. Statistical data relating

 

to expected future incurred claims shall be provided to the

 

commissioner and the attorney general for certificates sold or to

 

be sold when available.

 

     Sec. 609. (1) A rate is not excessive if the rate is not

 

unreasonably high relative to the following elements, individually

 

or collectively; provision for anticipated benefit costs; provision

 

for administrative expense; provision for cost transfers, if any;

 

provision for a contribution to or from surplus that is consistent

 

with the attainment or maintenance of adequate and unimpaired

 

surplus as provided in section 204a; and provision for adjustments

 

due to prior experience of groups, as defined in the group rating

 


system. A determination as to whether a rate is excessive relative

 

to these elements, individually or collectively, shall be based on

 

the following: reasonable evaluations of recent claim experience;

 

projected trends in claim costs; the allocation of administrative

 

expense budgets; and the present and anticipated unimpaired surplus

 

of the health care corporation. To the extent that any of these

 

elements are considered excessive, the provision in the rates for

 

these elements shall be modified accordingly.

 

     (2) The administrative expense budget must be reasonable, as

 

determined by the commissioner after examination of material and

 

substantial administrative and acquisition expense items.

 

     (3) A rate is equitable if the rate can be compared to any

 

other rate offered by the health care corporation to its

 

subscribers, and the observed rate differences can be supported by

 

differences in anticipated benefit costs, administrative expense

 

cost, differences in risk, or any identified cost transfer

 

provisions.

 

     (4) A rate is adequate if the rate is not unreasonably low

 

relative to the elements prescribed in subsection (1), individually

 

or collectively, based on reasonable evaluations of recent claim

 

experience, projected trends in claim costs, the allocation of

 

administrative expense budgets, and the present and anticipated

 

unimpaired surplus of the health care corporation.

 

     (5) Except for identified cost transfers, each line of

 

business, over time, shall be self-sustaining. However, there may

 

be cost transfers for the benefit of senior citizens who are

 

residents of this state and group conversion subscribers. Cost

 


transfers for the benefit of senior citizens, in the aggregate,

 

annually shall not exceed 1% of the earned subscription income of

 

the health care corporation as reported in the most recent annual

 

statement of the corporation. Group conversion subscribers are

 

those who have maintained coverage with the health care corporation

 

on an individual basis after leaving a subscriber group. Cost

 

transfers for the benefit of senior citizens shall be expended in

 

the following order of priority:

 

     (a) To provide a subsidy for seniors with a household income

 

of not more than 300% of the federal poverty level as defined in

 

the poverty guidelines published annually in the Federal Register

 

by the United States department of health and human services under

 

its authority to revise the poverty line under section 673(2) of

 

subtitle B of title VI of the omnibus budget reconciliation act of

 

1981, Public Law 97-35, 42 USC 9902.

 

     (b) To provide a subsidy for seniors with a household income

 

of more than 300% of the federal poverty level as defined in the

 

poverty guidelines published annually in the Federal Register by

 

the United States department of health and human services under its

 

authority to revise the poverty line under section 673(2) of

 

subtitle B of title VI of the omnibus budget reconciliation act of

 

1981, Public Law 97-35, 42 USC 9902.

 

     (6) Subsections (1) to (4) apply only to rate filings

 

submitted pursuant to section 608(2).

 

     Sec. 610. (1) Except as provided under section 608(4) or (5),

 

a filing of information and materials relative to a proposed rate

 

under section 608(1) or (2) shall be made not less than 120 60 days

 


before the proposed effective date of the proposed rate. A filing

 

shall not be considered to have been received until there has been

 

substantial and material compliance with the requirements

 

prescribed in subsections (6) and (8) this section.

 

     (2) Within 30 15 days after a filing is made of information

 

and materials relative to a proposed rate, the commissioner shall

 

do either of the following:

 

     (a) Give For a rate filing under section 608(2), give written

 

notice to the corporation, and to each person described under

 

section 612(1), that the filing is in material and substantial

 

compliance with subsections (6) and (8) this section and that the

 

filing is complete. The commissioner shall then proceed to approve,

 

approve with modifications, or disapprove the rate filing 60 days

 

after receipt of the filing, based upon whether the filing meets

 

the requirements of this act. However, if a hearing has been

 

requested under section 613, the commissioner shall not approve,

 

approve with modifications, or disapprove a filing until the

 

hearing has been completed and an order issued.

 

     (b) Give written notice to the corporation that the

 

corporation has not yet complied with subsections (6) and (8) this

 

section. The notice shall state specifically in what respects the

 

filing fails to meet the requirements of subsections (6) and (8)

 

this section.

 

     (3) Within 10 8 days after the filing of notice pursuant to

 

subsection (2)(b), the corporation shall submit to the commissioner

 

such additional information and materials, as requested by the

 

commissioner. Within 10 8 days after receipt of the additional

 


information and materials, the commissioner shall determine whether

 

the filing is in material and substantial compliance with

 

subsections (6) and (8) this section. If the commissioner

 

determines that the filing does not yet materially and

 

substantially meet the requirements of subsections (6) and (8) this

 

section, the commissioner shall give notice to the corporation

 

pursuant to subsection (2)(b) or use visitation of the

 

corporation's facilities and examination of the corporation's

 

records to obtain the necessary information described in the notice

 

issued pursuant to subsection (2)(b). The commissioner shall use

 

either procedure previously mentioned, or a combination of both

 

procedures, in order to obtain the necessary information as

 

expeditiously as possible. The per diem, traveling, reproduction,

 

and other necessary expenses in connection with visitation and

 

examination shall be paid by the corporation, and shall be credited

 

to the general fund of the state.

 

     (4) If a filing is approved, approved with modifications, or

 

disapproved under subsection (2)(a), the commissioner shall issue a

 

written order of the approval, approval with modifications, or

 

disapproval. If the filing was approved with modifications or

 

disapproved, the order shall state specifically in what respects

 

the filing fails to meet the requirements of this act and, if

 

applicable, what modifications are required for approval under this

 

act. If the filing was approved with modifications, the order shall

 

state that the filing shall take effect after the modifications are

 

made and approved by the commissioner. If the filing was

 

disapproved, the order shall state that the filing shall not take

 


effect.

 

     (5) The inability to approve 1 or more rating classes of

 

business within a line of business because of a requirement to

 

submit further data or because a request for a hearing under

 

section 613 has been granted shall not delay the approval of rates

 

by the commissioner which could otherwise be approved or the

 

implementation of rates already approved, unless the approval or

 

implementation would affect the consideration of the unapproved

 

classes of business.

 

     (4) The commissioner shall determine whether a rate filing

 

under section 608(1) is in material and substantial compliance with

 

this section and is complete by not later than 30 days before the

 

proposed effective date of the proposed rate. A rate filing under

 

section 608(1) that is in material and substantial compliance with

 

this section and is complete shall be considered approved and

 

become effective 60 days after the rates are filed with the

 

commissioner.

 

     (5) The commissioner, the attorney general, or a person who

 

has standing may request a hearing under section 613a for a rate

 

filing approved under subsection (4) if the commissioner, the

 

attorney general, or the person who has standing has reasonable

 

cause to believe the proposed rates do not satisfy the standards in

 

section 608(1). Rates considered approved and effective under

 

subsection (4) shall remain in effect during the pendency of a

 

hearing under section 613a.

 

     (6) Information furnished under subsection (1) in support of a

 

nongroup rate filing shall include the following:

 


     (a) Recent claim experience on the benefits or comparable

 

benefits for which the rate filing applies.

 

     (b) Actual prior trend experience.

 

     (c) Actual prior administrative expenses.

 

     (d) Projected trend factors.

 

     (e) Projected administrative expenses.

 

     (f) Contributions for risk and contingency reserve surplus

 

factors.

 

     (g) Actual health care corporation contingency reserve surplus

 

position.

 

     (h) Projected health care corporation contingency reserve

 

surplus position.

 

     (i) Other information which that the corporation considers

 

pertinent to evaluating the risks to be rated , or relevant to the

 

determination to be made under this section.

 

     (j) Other information which that the commissioner considers

 

pertinent to evaluating the risks to be rated , or relevant to the

 

determination to be made under this section.

 

     (7) A copy of the filing, and all supporting information,

 

except for the information which may not be disclosed under section

 

604, shall be open to public inspection as of the date filed with

 

the commissioner.

 

     (8) The commissioner shall make available forms and

 

instructions for filing for proposed rates under sections 608(1)

 

and 608(2). The forms with instructions shall be available not less

 

than 180 days before the proposed effective date of the filing.

 

     Sec. 612. (1) Upon receipt of a rate filing under section 610,

 


the commissioner immediately shall notify each person who has

 

requested in writing notice of those filings within the previous 2

 

years, specifying the nature and extent of the proposed rate

 

revision and identifying the location, time, and place where the

 

copy of the rate filing described in section 610(7) shall be open

 

to public inspection and copying. The For a rate filing made under

 

section 608(2) only, the notice shall also state that if the person

 

has standing, the person shall have, upon making a written request

 

for a hearing within 60 days after receiving notice of the rate

 

filing, an opportunity for an evidentiary hearing under section 613

 

to determine whether the proposed rates meet the requirements of

 

this act. The request shall identify the issues which the

 

requesting party asserts are involved, what portion of the rate

 

filing is requested to be heard, and how the party has standing.

 

The corporation shall place advertisements giving notice,

 

containing the information specified above, in at least 1 newspaper

 

which serves each geographic area in which significant numbers of

 

subscribers reside.

 

     (2) The commissioner may charge a fee for providing, pursuant

 

to subsection (1), a copy of the rate filing described in section

 

610(7). The commissioner may charge a fee for providing a copy of

 

the entire filing to a person whose request for a hearing has been

 

granted by the commissioner pursuant to section 613 or 613a. The

 

fee shall be limited to actual mailing costs and to the actual

 

incremental cost of duplication, including labor and the cost of

 

deletion and separation of information as provided in section 14 of

 

Act No. 442 of the Public Acts of 1976, being section 15.244 of the

 


Michigan Compiled Laws the freedom of information act, 1976 PA 442,

 

MCL 15.244. Copies of the filing may be provided free of charge or

 

at a reduced charge if the commissioner determines that a waiver or

 

reduction of the fee is in the public interest because the

 

furnishing of a copy of the filing will primarily benefit the

 

general public. In calculating the costs under this subsection, the

 

commissioner shall not attribute more than the hourly wage of the

 

lowest paid, full-time clerical employee of the insurance bureau

 

office of financial and insurance regulation to the cost of labor

 

incurred in duplication and mailing and to the cost of separation

 

and deletion. The commissioner shall use the most economical means

 

available to provide copies of a rate filing.

 

     Sec. 613. (1) If the request for a hearing under this section

 

is with regard to a rate filing under section 608(2) not yet acted

 

upon under section 610(2)(a), no such action shall be taken by the

 

commissioner until after the hearing has been completed. However,

 

the commissioner shall proceed to act upon those portions of a rate

 

filing under section 608(2) upon which no hearing has been

 

requested. Within 15 days after receipt of a request for a hearing,

 

the commissioner shall determine if the person has standing. If the

 

commissioner determines that the person has standing, the person

 

may have access to the entire filing subject to the same

 

confidentiality requirements as the commissioner under section 604,

 

and shall be subject to the penalty provision of section 604(5).

 

Upon determining that the person has standing, the commissioner

 

shall immediately appoint an independent hearing officer before

 

whom the hearing shall be held. In appointing an independent

 


hearing officer, the commissioner shall select a person qualified

 

to conduct hearings, who has experience or education in the area of

 

health care corporation or insurance rate determination and

 

finance, and who is not otherwise associated financially with a

 

health care corporation or a health care provider. The person

 

selected shall not be currently or actively employed by this state.

 

For purposes of this subsection, an employee of an educational

 

institution shall not be considered to be employed by this state.

 

For purposes of this section, a person has "standing" if any of the

 

following circumstances exist:

 

     (a) The person is, or there are reasonable grounds to believe

 

that the person could be, aggrieved by the proposed rate.

 

     (b) The person is acting on behalf of 1 or more named persons

 

described in subdivision (a).

 

     (c) The person is the commissioner, the attorney general, or

 

the health care corporation.

 

     (2) Not more than 30 days after receipt of a request for a

 

hearing, and upon not less than 15 days' notice to all parties, the

 

hearing shall be commenced. Each party to the hearing shall be

 

given a reasonable opportunity for discovery before and throughout

 

the course of the hearing. However, the hearing officer may

 

terminate discovery at any time, for good cause shown. The hearing

 

officer shall conduct the hearing pursuant to the administrative

 

procedures act. The hearing shall be conducted in an expeditious

 

manner. At the hearing, the burden of proving compliance with this

 

act shall be upon the health care corporation.

 

     (3) In rendering a proposal for a decision, the hearing

 


officer shall consider the factors prescribed in section 609.

 

     (4) Within 30 days after receipt of the hearing officer's

 

proposal for decision, the commissioner shall by order render a

 

decision which shall include a statement of findings.

 

     (5) The commissioner shall withdraw an order of approval or

 

approval with modifications if the commissioner finds that the

 

filing no longer meets the requirements of this act.

 

     Sec. 613a. (1) By not later than 30 days after rates are

 

considered approved and effective under section 610(4), the

 

commissioner, the attorney general, or a person who has standing

 

may request a hearing if there is reasonable cause to believe that

 

the proposed rates do not satisfy the standards in section 608(1).

 

     (2) Upon receipt of a request for a hearing, the commissioner

 

shall immediately appoint an independent hearing officer before

 

whom the hearing shall be held. In appointing an independent

 

hearing officer, the commissioner shall select a person qualified

 

to conduct hearings, who has experience or education in the area of

 

health care corporation or insurance rate determination and

 

finance, and who is not otherwise associated financially with a

 

health care corporation or a health care provider. The person

 

selected shall not be currently or actively employed by this state.

 

For purposes of this subsection, an employee of an educational

 

institution shall not be considered to be employed by the state.

 

     (3) Not more than 30 days after receipt of a request for a

 

hearing, and upon not less than 15 days' notice to all parties, the

 

hearing shall be commenced. Each party to the hearing shall be

 

given a reasonable opportunity for discovery before and throughout

 


the course of the hearing. However, the hearing officer may

 

terminate discovery at any time, for good cause shown. The hearing

 

officer shall conduct the hearing pursuant to the administrative

 

procedures act. The hearing shall be conducted in an expeditious

 

manner. At the hearing, the burden of proving compliance with

 

section 608(1) shall be upon the health care corporation.

 

     (4) Within 30 days after the conclusion of the hearing, the

 

hearing officer shall issue a proposal for decision. In rendering a

 

proposal for decision, the hearing officer shall consider the

 

factors in section 608(1).

 

     (5) Within 30 days after receipt of the hearing officer's

 

proposal for decision, the commissioner shall by order determine

 

whether the rates satisfy the standards in section 608(1). The

 

decision shall include a statement of findings.

 

     (6) The commissioner shall issue an order of disapproval or

 

approval with modifications if the commissioner finds that the

 

filing no longer meets the requirements of section 608(1).

 

     (7) The commissioner's order under subsections (5) and (6)

 

shall be issued no later than 180 days after the proposed rates are

 

filed under section 608(1). If the commissioner does not issue an

 

order within 180 days of filing, the rates considered approved and

 

effective under section 610(4) shall remain in effect and the rates

 

shall not be subject to further challenge by the commissioner, the

 

attorney general, or a person with standing. The 180-day period,

 

however, shall be tolled for any period of time the health care

 

corporation takes to submit additional information under section

 

610(3) that is beyond the time the health care corporation is

 


permitted to take.

 

     (8) If the commissioner's order under subsection (6) results

 

in approval of a lower rate, appropriate refunds or adjustments, as

 

determined by the commissioner, shall be made to reflect payments

 

in excess of the approved rate. The refunds or adjustments shall

 

include interest from the date the rates were considered approved

 

and effective under section 610(4) to the date of the refund or

 

adjustment calculated at the average rate of interest for 13-week

 

United States treasury notes as determined by the commissioner.

 

     Enacting section 1. Section 614 of the nonprofit health care

 

corporation reform act, 1980 PA 350, MCL 550.1614, is repealed.

 

     Enacting section 2. This amendatory act takes effect October

 

1, 2009.

 

     Enacting section 3. This amendatory act does not take effect

 

unless Senate Bill No.____ or House Bill No. 4934(request no.

 

00801'09) of the 95th Legislature is enacted into law.