DUAL ENROLLMENT: NONPUBLIC STUDENTS S.B. 709 (S-3) & 710 (S-3):
SUMMARY AS PASSED BY THE SENATE
[Please see the PDF version of this analysis, if available, to view this image.]
Senate Bill 709 (Substitute S-3 as passed by the Senate)
Senate Bill 710 (Substitute S-3 as passed by the Senate)
Sponsor: Senator Judy K. Emmons
Committee: Education
Date Completed: 10-31-11
CONTENT
Senate Bills 709 (S-3) and 710 (S-3) would amend the Career and Technical Preparation Act and the Postsecondary Enrollment Options Act, respectively, to:
-- Extend provisions for dual enrollment in postsecondary institutions to high school students in State-approved nonpublic schools and home-schooled children.
-- Require the Department of Treasury to pay the tuition for a postsecondary course taken by a nonpublic school student or home-schooled child based on a prorated percentage of the statewide pupil-weighted average foundation allowance.
-- Require the Legislature to appropriate funds to the Department of Treasury for making required payments.
-- Extend repayment provisions to nonpublic school and home-schooled students who did not complete an eligible course.
-- Require repayment by a public, nonpublic, or home-schooled student who enrolled in an eligible course for postsecondary credit only and did not successfully complete it.
-- Allow a dually enrolled nonpublic school student or home-schooled child to receive only postsecondary credit for a course, unless it would be considered a "nonessential elective course".
-- Require a postsecondary institution to report annually to the Department of Education.
In addition, under the bills, for a dually enrolled public school student, the payment to a postsecondary institution would have to be based on a prorated percentage of the statewide pupil-weighted average foundation allowance.
(The Postsecondary Enrollment Options Act and the Career and Technical Preparation Act permit eligible high school students to enroll in courses at community colleges or universities, or at career and technical preparation programs operated by colleges and universities, for the purpose of earning high school or postsecondary credit or both. As discussed in the fiscal analysis below, a nonpublic or home-schooled student currently may dually enroll in a postsecondary institution only if he or she also enrolls in a nonessential elective course at a public school.)
The bills would take effect on July 1, 2012. They are tie-barred to each other and to Senate Bills 622 and 623. Senate Bills 622 (S-5) and 623 (S-5) would amend the same Acts to include in the definitions of "eligible student" a student enrolled in a State-approved nonpublic school and a home-schooled child enrolled in high school, and remove the requirement that a student be in at least grade 11 to participate, limit the number of postsecondary courses in which an eligible student could enroll, and limit the tuition paid to a community college for a dually enrolled student to the in-district rate.
Senate Bills 709 (S-3) and 710 (S-3) are described in detail below. Except where noted, the provisions in both bills are the same, and references in this summary to a
"postsecondary institution" include a career and technical preparation program as well as a community college or university.
Readiness Assessment Costs
Each Act contains provisions for students to take a readiness assessment (or a job skills assessment test) for the purpose of determining eligibility to participate in dual enrollment. Unless the school district in which a student is enrolled elects to pay the costs related to the assessment, the student is responsible for the costs. Under the bills, a student also would be responsible for the costs if the State-approved nonpublic school in which he or she was enrolled did not elect to pay the costs.
Letter of Eligibility; Notice of Enrollment
Each Act requires the school district in which an eligible student is enrolled, upon his or her request, to give the student a letter signed by the principal indicating the student's eligibility under the Act. The bills would extend this requirement to a State-approved nonpublic school. For a home-schooled child, his or her parent or legal guardian could supply the letter.
Currently, within a reasonable time after registration, a postsecondary institution must send to an eligible student and his or her school district written notice indicating the student's course or courses and hours of enrollment. Under the bills, this would apply in the case of an eligible student enrolled in a school district.
For an eligible student enrolled in a State-approved nonpublic school, the postsecondary institution would have to notify the student, the nonpublic school, and the Michigan Department of Education (MDE). For an eligible student who was home-schooled, the institution would have to notify the student, his or her parent or legal guardian, and the MDE.
Billing & Payment
Public School Students. Currently, unless otherwise provided between a postsecondary institution and a eligible student's school district, after the institution's drop/add period for the course expires, the institution must send the school district a bill detailing the eligible charges for each eligible course in which the student is enrolled under the Act.
The school district then must pay to the postsecondary institution an amount equal to the lesser of the amount of the eligible charges or a percentage of the State portion of the foundation allowance paid on behalf of the student, prorated by the proportion of the school year that the student attends the postsecondary institution.
Under the bills, the amount a school district must pay to a postsecondary institution would be lesser of the eligible charges or the prorated percentage of the statewide pupil-weighted average foundation allowance, as calculated under the State School Aid Act, for all school districts for the State fiscal year beginning on October 1 of the academic year of enrollment in the postsecondary institution, with the proration based on the proportion of the school year that the student attended the postsecondary institution. In the calculation of the statewide pupil-weighted average foundation allowance for this purpose, however, if a school district's foundation allowance were above the basic foundation allowance, the district's foundation allowance would have to be considered the basic foundation allowance.
By September 1 of each year, the MDE would have to notify the Department of Treasury of the amount of the statewide pupil-weighted foundation allowance as calculated for these purposes.
Nonpublic or Home-Schooled Students. For an eligible student who was enrolled in a State-approved nonpublic school or a home-schooled child, after the drop/add period for the course expired, the postsecondary institution would have to send the MDE a bill detailing the eligible charges for each eligible course in which the student was dually enrolled. The MDE would have to determine the amount of the eligible charges to be paid by the Department of Treasury to the postsecondary institution on behalf of the eligible student and deliver this information to the Treasury Department by appropriate electronic means.
The Department of Treasury then would have to pay to the postsecondary institution an amount equal to the lesser of the amount of the eligible charges or the prorated percentage of the statewide pupil-weighted average foundation allowance (as described above for dually enrolled public school students). By September 1 of each year, the MDE would have to notify the Department of Treasury of the amount of the statewide pupil-weighted foundation allowance as calculated for these purposes.
The eligible student would be responsible for paying the remainder of the costs associated with his or her enrollment in the postsecondary institution that exceeded the amount paid by the Department of Treasury.
(The Acts define "eligible charges" as tuition and mandatory course fees, material fees, and registration fees required for enrollment in an eligible course. Eligible charges do not include transportation or parking costs, or activity fees.
An "eligible course" is a course offered by a postsecondary institution that is not offered by the school district (or intermediate school district or area vocational-technical education program, under the Career and Technical Preparation Act) in which an eligible student is enrolled, or that is offered but is not available to the student because of a scheduling conflict beyond the student's control; that is an academic course not ordinarily taken as an activity course; that is a course the postsecondary institution normally applies toward satisfaction of degree requirements; and that is not a hobby craft or recreational course. Also, under the Postsecondary Enrollment Options Act, an eligible course must be in a subject area other than physical education, theology, divinity, or religious education.)
Repayment
Public School Students. Currently, if an eligible student is enrolled in an eligible course under either Act, and the student does not complete the course, and if the school district has paid money for the course on the student's behalf, the postsecondary institution must forward to the school district any funds that are refundable. The school district then must forward to the student any refunded money in excess of the amount paid by the district for the course.
Under the bills, these requirements also would apply if a student enrolled in an eligible course for postsecondary credit only and did not successfully complete the course.
The Career and Technical Preparation Act also requires the student to repay the district any funds it spent for the course that were not refunded to the school, unless the student did not complete the course due to a family or medical emergency, as determined by the program. Senate Bill 710 (S-3) would add the same language to the Postsecondary Enrollment Options Act.
Nonpublic or Home-Schooled Students. Under both bills, for an eligible student who was enrolled in a State-approved nonpublic school or was a home-schooled child, if the student did not complete an eligible postsecondary course or, if the student enrolled in the eligible course for postsecondary credit only and did not successfully complete the course, and if the Department of Treasury had paid money for the course on the student's behalf, the postsecondary institution would have to forward to the Treasury Department any funds that were refundable. If applicable, the postsecondary institution then would have to refund to the student any funds that were refundable and in excess of the amount paid by the Department for the course on the student's behalf.
The student would have to repay to the Department of Treasury any funds that it spent for the course that were not refunded to the Department by the postsecondary institution, unless the student did not complete the course due to a family or medical emergency, as determined by the institution.
Course Credit
The Acts allow an eligible student to enroll in, and receive payment by the school district for, an eligible course for high school credit or postsecondary credit, or both. At the time of enrollment, the student must designate whether the course is for high school credit or postsecondary credit, or both, and must notify his or her high school and the postsecondary institution of that designation.
Under the bills, except as provided below, an eligible student in a State-approved nonpublic school or a home school could enroll in, and receive payment by the Department of Treasury for, an eligible course only for postsecondary credit, and could not receive high school credit for the course.
If an eligible nonpublic school student or home-schooled student were enrolled in an eligible course that would have been considered a nonessential elective course under Snyder v Charlotte Public School District, 421 Mich 517 (1984), then the student could enroll in, and receive payment by the Treasury Department of all or part of eligible charges for an eligible course under either Act for high school credit or postsecondary credit, or both. At the time of enrollment, the student would have to designate whether the course was for high school or postsecondary credit, or both, and notify his or her high school and the postsecondary institution of that designation.
(In Snyder v Charlotte Public School District, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed whether the public school district was required to provide "shared time instruction" in a band class to a student who was enrolled in the Charlotte Christian Academy. The Court held that a State-approved nonpublic school must teach subjects comparable to those taught in the public schools, such as basic reading, writing, mathematics, and English, but is not required to offer identical courses. "Thus, 'nonessential elective courses,' such as band, art, domestic science, advanced math, and science classes, etc., need not be taught in nonpublic schools. These are the types of courses that have traditionally been offered on a shared time basis.")
As currently provided, an eligible student taking more than one eligible course could make different credit designations for different courses.
Full-Time Enrollment
The Acts' requirements for notice of enrollment, billing, payment, and repayment do not apply to postsecondary courses in which an eligible student is enrolled in addition to being enrolled full-time in his or her school district. Under the bills, the requirements also would not apply if a student were enrolled full-time in a State-approved nonpublic school or home school program.
Currently, in determining full-time enrollment in a school-district or full-time equated membership under the State School Aid Act, for a pupil enrolled in a postsecondary institution, the pupil's enrollment in both the school district and the postsecondary institution must be counted as enrollment in the school district, and a pupil cannot be considered to be enrolled in a school less than full-time solely because of the effect of his or her postsecondary enrollment on the number of class hours provided by the district to the pupil.
The bills would add comparable provisions concerning full-time enrollment in a State-approved nonpublic school or home school program.
Information & Counseling
Currently, each school district must provide information to all high school students on the postsecondary enrollment options under the Acts, including enrollment eligibility, the programs and types of courses eligible for participation, the decision-making process for granting academic credits, and an explanation of eligible charges that will be paid.
To the extent possible, a school district must provide counseling services to an eligible student and his or her parent or guardian before the student enrolls in a postsecondary course.
By March 1 of each school year, a school district must provide general information about the postsecondary options to all pupils in grade 8 or higher.
Before enrolling in an eligible course at a postsecondary institution, an eligible student and his or her parent or guardian must file with the institution a signed form provided by the school district stating that the student is eligible and has received the required information and counseling. Upon request, the MDE must provide technical assistance to a school district and a postsecondary institution in developing forms and counseling guidelines.
The bills would extend these provisions to State-approved nonpublic schools. With respect to the information that must be provided to all high school students regarding postsecondary enrollment options, the bills would require the information to include the possibility of being required to repay the school district or Treasury Department for money paid on behalf of a student.
Annual Report
The bills would require each postsecondary institution to report all of the following annually to the Department of Education:
-- The number of eligible students who enrolled in the postsecondary institution under the Act during the preceding academic year.
-- The total number of eligible courses completed by dually enrolled students during the preceding academic year.
-- The number of eligible courses for which the institution granted postsecondary credit to the eligible student.
-- The number of eligible courses for which the institution declined to grant postsecondary credit.
MCL 388.1903a et al. (S.B. 709)
388.513a et al. (S.B. 710)
Legislative Analyst: Suzanne Lowe
FISCAL IMPACT
State: The bills would require the Department of Treasury to make payments to eligible postsecondary institutions for eligible courses, on behalf of nonpublic or home-schooled students participating in dual enrollment as allowed under the bills. Under current practice, a nonpublic or home-schooled student is able to participate in dual enrollment and generate State payment for the course if the student first enrolls in at least one nonessential elective course at a public school. When a nonpublic or home-schooled student enrolls in at least one elective course at a public school, the public school can count the portion of the day that student is enrolled in both the elective and the dual enrollment course, and the school district, using State funds, is responsible for a portion of the district's foundation allowance equal to the portion of time spent in the elective course and eligible postsecondary course.
The bills would allow a nonpublic or home-schooled student to dual enroll directly in an eligible postsecondary course and would require the Department of Treasury to pay for that portion of the day spent in the dually enrolled course, without requiring the student to first enroll in a class at the public school. The bills include language requiring the Legislature to make an appropriation to the Department of Treasury for making payments required under the Act, for a dually enrolled nonpublic or home-schooled student, and this direct appropriation to the Department would likely be from the State's General Fund. This would be different from the current practice, because current practice has the public school count the student, receive a foundation allowance payment, and pay the postsecondary institution out of the State portion of that foundation allowance funding.
The bills also would change the basis for payments from the State portion of a district's foundation allowance to the statewide pupil-weighted average foundation allowance, which could result in some changes at both the public school and the postsecondary institution. In addition, the bills would require a dually enrolled student to reimburse the district or State for any funds spent by the district or State that were not refunded by the postsecondary institution, when a student failed to successfully complete a course. This requirement is not in current statute, and could result in some slight new revenue being returned in some situations.
The net fiscal impact on the State is indeterminate. First, by removing the requirement that a nonpublic or home-schooled student enroll with a public school first before dually enrolling, the bills likely would lead to increased participation, which would result in increased State costs. At the same time, if some of the existing participants (those who are enrolled in at least one public school course plus the dual enrollment course) chose to disenroll from the public school and directly enroll at the postsecondary institution, there would be some State savings because the State would be paying only for the portion of the day spent at the postsecondary institution, rather than also the portion of the day enrolled at the public school. However, it seems likely that the probable increase in participation would outweigh the potential savings (which would occur only when those students who would have dually enrolled instead enrolled only at the postsecondary institution), though the magnitude is unknown. For each additional dual enrollment course taken by a nonpublic or home-schooled student who does not currently first enroll in a public district, the cost would be about $1,200 per year, if the eligible charges totaled one-sixth of the statewide average foundation allowance. Again, a direct appropriation to the Department of Treasury would be necessary in order to provide funding for the eligible expenses. In FY 2010-11, $12.6 million was spent by school districts to pay for eligible expenses under the dual enrollment provisions; this included the costs for both public and nonpublic students.
The Department of Education would be required to process and calculate eligible costs of the dual enrollment courses taken by nonpublic and home-schooled students, and forward that information to the Department of Treasury for payment to the postsecondary institutions providing dual enrollment courses. Therefore, the Department of Education could see some increased costs related to these processes, and Treasury could see some increased costs associated with processing the new payments.
Local: Because the legislation would allow nonpublic or home-schooled students to use dual enrollment provisions without first enrolling in a public school, it is likely that public schools would see a decrease in revenue tied to this occurrence. Under current practice, a public school that enrolls a nonpublic or home-schooled student in at least one course, as well as a dual enrollment course, receives foundation allowance payments for the portion of the school year the student is enrolled. Therefore, if removing the requirement that a nonpublic student first enroll in the public school before dually enrolling resulted in fewer nonpublic students enrolling at the public school, the public schools would see decreased foundation allowance revenue from the State.
The change in the basis for payments from the State portion of a district's foundation allowance to the pupil-weighted average foundation also could result in some local impacts, which likely would cost districts additional funding to pay for dual enrollment. A district's foundation allowance is a mix of State and local funding, and current law requires the district to pay to the postsecondary institution only the prorated piece of the State portion of the foundation allowance. However, the proposed change would require a district to pay to the postsecondary institution the prorated piece of the entire statewide pupil-weighted average foundation allowance, which is estimated at roughly $7,200 in FY 2011-12.
Fiscal Analyst: Kathryn Summers
Analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent. sb709&710/1112