PROHIBIT POWDERED ALCOHOLS;

AND OTHER LIQUOR CODE AMENDMENTS

House Bill 5798

Sponsor:  Rep. Hugh Crawford

Committee:  Regulatory Reform

Complete to 9-16-14

A SUMMARY OF HOUSE BILL 5798 AS INTRODUCED 9-16-14

House Bill 5798 would amend the Michigan Liquor Control Code by prohibiting the sale, possession, and use of powdered alcohol, and modifying sections relating to certain bar items, conditional liquor licenses, and the distilling of brandy.

Powdered alcohol

The bill would add a Section 914A to the act. This section would define powdered alcohol as alcohol that is sold in powder form for either direct use or reconstitution. An individual would be prohibited from using, possessing, selling, or offering for use or sale, powdered alcohol. A person violating this prohibition would be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than six months or a fine of not more than $500, or both.

This ban would not apply to a hospital that operates primarily for the purpose of conducting scientific research, a state institution conducting bona fide research, a private college or university conducting bona fide research, or a pharmaceutical company or biotechnology company conducting bona fide research.

Definition changes

The definition of "alcoholic liquor" would be amended to include powder which contains one-half of one percent or more of alcohol by volume for food or beverage purposes. Currently, the definition does not refer to "food purposes."

Also amended would be the term "other valuable thing," which would be modified by adding "consumable goods" to a list of exceptions for items that can be given, loaned, leased, or sold to another licensee that are allowed either by rule or by order of the Michigan Liquor Control Commission prior to January 1, 2014.

Brandy manufacturer

The definition of brandy manufacturer would be changed to "a wine maker or a small wine maker licensed under this act to manufacture, rectify, or blend brandy only and no other spirit. The commission may approve a brandy manufacturer to sell brandy that it manufactures, blends, or rectifies, or both, at its licensed premises or at other premises authorized in this act." The current definition also states that only a licensed wine maker or small wine maker is eligible to be a brandy manufacturer.

Conditional liquor license

The bill would add the requirement that an individual applying for a conditional liquor license when applying for the transfer of an existing license at the same location would have to include any existing permits and approvals held in connection with that license.

Approved bar items

House Bill 5798 also would add keg couplers that are lent to an on-premises retailer and sporting event or entertainment tickets to a list of items that a manufacturer, mixed spirit drink manufacturer, warehouse, wholesaler, outstate seller of beer, outstate seller of wine, outstate of mixed spirit drink, or vendor of spirits may provide to another licensee under Section 609(3). The bill would add a new Section 609(4), and renumber the subsequent subsections. The new subsection would allow a wholesaler to sell brand logoed items to an off-premises licensee if those brand logoed items are contained with the packaging of an alcoholic liquor product that is to be sold to a consumer. A retailer would not be allowed to possess at its licensed premises advertising items that have a use or value beyond the actual advertising of brands and prices of alcoholic liquor, with the exception of the items listed in Section 609(3) and 609(4). Currently, only the items in Section 609(3) are exempted. The bill would add Section 609(4).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There would be no significant fiscal impact for the Liquor Control Commission or the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.

The bill adds a new misdemeanor. Misdemeanor convictions would increase costs related to county jails and/or local misdemeanor probation supervision.  The costs of local incarceration in a county jail and local misdemeanor probation supervision vary by jurisdiction.  Fines would go to public libraries.

                                                                                           Legislative Analyst:   Josh Roesner

                                                                                                  Fiscal Analyst:   Paul Holland 

                                                                                                                           Robin Risko 

■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House staff for use by House members in their deliberations, and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.