SB-0207, As Passed Senate, January 20, 2016
SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE BILL NO. 207
A bill to amend 1949 PA 300, entitled
"Michigan vehicle code,"
(MCL 257.1 to 257.923) by adding sections 62a, 625r, and 625s.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
Sec. 62a. "Standardized field sobriety test" means 1 of the
standardized tests validated by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. A field sobriety test is considered a standardized
field sobriety test under this section if it is administered in
substantial compliance with the standards prescribed by the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Sec. 625r. (1) A peace officer who is certified as a drug
recognition expert as that term is defined in section 625q in a
county participating in the roadside drug testing pilot program
under section 625q who has reasonable cause to believe that a
person was operating a vehicle upon a highway or other place open
to the public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including
an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within this state
and that the person by the consumption of a controlled substance,
may have affected his or her ability to operate a vehicle, or
reasonable cause to believe that a person had in his or her body
any amount of a controlled substance listed in schedule 1 under
section 7212 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7212,
or a rule promulgated under that section, or of a controlled
substance described in section 7214(a)(iv) of the public health
code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7214, may require the person to submit
to a preliminary oral fluid analysis administered under this
subsection.
(2) A peace officer who is certified as a drug recognition
expert as that term is defined in section 625q in a county
participating in the roadside drug testing pilot program under
section 625q may arrest a person in whole or in part upon the
results of a preliminary oral fluid analysis.
(3) The results of a preliminary oral fluid analysis are
admissible in a criminal prosecution for a crime enumerated in
section 625c(1) or in an administrative hearing for 1 or more of
the following purposes:
(a) To assist the court or hearing officer in determining a
challenge to the validity of an arrest. This subdivision does not
limit the introduction of other competent evidence offered to
establish the validity of an arrest.
(b) As evidence of the presence or nonpresence of a controlled
substance in the defendant's oral fluid if offered by the defendant
to rebut testimony elicited on cross-examination of a defense
witness that a preliminary oral fluid analysis of the defendant's
oral fluid showed the presence of a controlled substance that was
not found to be present when a chemical test of the defendant's
blood or urine was administered under section 625a.
(c) As evidence of the presence or nonpresence of a controlled
substance in the defendant's oral fluid if offered by the
prosecution to rebut testimony elicited on cross-examination of a
prosecution witness that a preliminary oral fluid analysis of the
defendant's oral fluid showed no presence of a controlled substance
that was found to be present when a chemical test of the
defendant's blood or urine was administered under section 625a.
(4) A person who submits to a preliminary oral fluid analysis
remains subject to the requirements of sections 625a, 625c, 625d,
625e, and 625f for purposes of chemical tests described in those
sections.
(5) Except as provided in subsection (9), a person who refuses
to submit to a preliminary oral fluid analysis upon a lawful
request by a peace officer is responsible for a civil infraction.
(6) A peace officer who is certified as a drug recognition
expert as that term is defined in section 625q in a county
participating in the roadside drug testing pilot program under
section 625q shall use the results of a preliminary oral fluid
analysis conducted under this section to determine whether to order
a person out of service under section 319d.
(7) A peace officer who is certified as a drug recognition
expert as that term is defined in section 625q in a county
participating in the roadside drug testing pilot program under
section 625q shall order out of service as required under section
319d a person who was operating a commercial motor vehicle and who
refuses to submit to a preliminary oral fluid analysis as provided
in this section. This subsection does not limit use of other
competent evidence by the peace officer to determine whether to
order a person out of service under section 319d.
(8) A person who operates a commercial motor vehicle and who
is requested to submit to a preliminary oral fluid analysis under
this section by a peace officer who is certified as a drug
recognition expert as that term is defined in section 625q in a
county participating in the pilot program under section 625q shall
be advised that refusing the request is a misdemeanor punishable by
imprisonment for not more than 93 days or a fine of not more than
$100.00, or both, and will result in the issuance of a 24-hour out-
of-service order.
(9) A person who operates a commercial motor vehicle and who
refuses to submit to a preliminary oral fluid analysis upon the
request of a peace officer who is certified as a drug recognition
expert as that term is defined in section 625q in a county
participating in the pilot program under section 625q is guilty of
a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 93 days
or a fine of not more than $100.00, or both.
Sec. 625s. A person who is qualified by knowledge, skill,
experience, training, or education, in the administration of
standardized field sobriety tests, including the horizontal gaze
nystagmus (HGN) test, shall be allowed to testify subject to
showing of a proper foundation of qualifications. This section does
not preclude the admissibility of a nonstandardized field sobriety
test if it complies with the Michigan rules of evidence.
Enacting section 1. This amendatory act takes effect 90 days
after the date it is enacted into law.
Enacting section 2. This amendatory act does not take effect
unless Senate Bill No. 434 of the 98th Legislature is enacted into
law.