SENATE BILL No. 936

 

 

May 3, 2016, Introduced by Senators EMMONS, HORN, JONES, GREGORY, COLBECK, PROOS, WARREN, KNOLLENBERG, BRANDENBURG, GREEN and BOOHER and referred to the Committee on Michigan Competitiveness.

 

 

 

     A bill to provide for the use of evidence-based supervision

 

practices; to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state

 

departments and local agencies; to require the adoption of certain

 

rules; to regulate the use of funds by certain state departments

 

and local agencies; and to require certain reports.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 1. As used in this act:

 

     (a) "Agency" means both of the following:

 

     (i) The department of corrections.

 

     (ii) Any regional, local, or county governmental agency that

 

receives state funding and that is responsible for supervising

 

individuals who are placed on probation or who are serving a period

 

of parole or postrelease supervision from a prison or jail.

 

Agency does not include a district court probation department

 


established under section 8314 of the revised judicature act of

 

1961, 1961 PA 236, MCL 600.8314.

 

     (b) "Case plan" means an individualized accountability and

 

behavior change strategy for supervised individuals that does all

 

of the following:

 

     (i) Targets and prioritizes the specific criminal risk factors

 

of the offender.

 

     (ii) Matches programs to the offender's individual

 

characteristics, such as gender, culture, motivational stage,

 

developmental stage, or learning style.

 

     (iii) Establishes a timetable for achieving specific

 

behavioral goals, including a schedule for payment of victim

 

restitution, child support, and other financial obligations. A

 

timetable established under this subparagraph for payment of victim

 

restitution, child support, and other financial obligations is

 

subject to an ability to pay determination.

 

     (iv) Specifies positive and negative actions that will be

 

taken in response to the supervised individual's behaviors.

 

     (c) "Community supervision" means either of the following:

 

     (i) The placement of an individual under supervision with

 

conditions imposed for a specified period if both of the following

 

apply:

 

     (A) Criminal proceedings against the individual are deferred

 

without an adjudication of guilt.

 

     (B) A sentence of imprisonment or confinement, imprisonment

 

and a fine, or confinement and a fine are imposed as terms of

 

probation and the imposition of the sentence is suspended in whole


or in part.

 

     (ii) The placement of an individual under supervision after

 

release from prison or jail, with conditions imposed by the

 

releasing authority for a specified period of time.

 

     (d) "Criminal risk factors" means characteristics and

 

behaviors that when addressed or changed affect an individual's

 

risk for committing crimes including antisocial attitudes, values,

 

and beliefs, poor impulse control, criminal personality, substance

 

abuse, criminal peers, dysfunctional family, or a lack of

 

employment or education.

 

     (e) "Evidence-based practices" means supervision policies,

 

procedures, programs, and practices that scientific research

 

demonstrates reduce recidivism among individuals on probation,

 

parole, or postrelease supervision.

 

     (f) "Program" means an intervention, other than medical

 

services, to which both of the following apply:

 

     (i) It is intended to reduce recidivism by supervised

 

individuals.

 

     (ii) It is funded in whole or in part by this state or is

 

administered by an agency of this state.

 

     (g) "Recidivism" means the rearrest, reconviction, and

 

reincarceration in prison or jail of an individual within 3 and 5

 

years of the individual's release from incarceration, placement on

 

probation, or conviction, whichever is later, and probation and

 

parole violations as well as misdemeanor and felony convictions, if

 

recidivism data regarding technical probation and parole violations

 

are collected and maintained separately from data on new felony or


misdemeanor convictions.

 

     (h) "Supervised individual" means an individual placed on

 

probation or serving a period of parole or postrelease supervision

 

from prison or jail.

 

     (i) "Supervising officer" means a person appointed or employed

 

by an agency to supervise individuals placed on community

 

supervision.

 

     Sec. 2. (1) The agency shall adopt policies, rules, and

 

regulations that within 4 years after the effective date of this

 

act result in all supervised individuals being supervised in

 

accordance with evidence-based practices, or practices developed

 

based upon evidence-based practices, in order to improve the

 

success rates of and to reduce recidivism rates for supervised

 

individuals. The agency shall consult with and seek recommendations

 

from local law enforcement agencies, including sheriff's

 

departments, circuit courts, county prosecutor's offices, and

 

community corrections programs, in adopting policies, rules, and

 

regulations for evidence-based supervision practices.

 

     (2) The policies, rules, and regulations under subsection (1)

 

shall include all of the following:

 

     (a) The adoption, validation, and utilization of an objective

 

risk and needs assessment tool.

 

     (b) The use of assessment scores and other objective criteria

 

to determine the risk level and program needs of each supervised

 

individual, prioritizing supervision and program resources for

 

offenders who are at higher risk to reoffend.

 

     (c) Definitions of low-, moderate-, and high-risk levels


during the period of supervision.

 

     (d) The development of a case plan, based on the assessment

 

score, for each individual who is assessed to be moderate to high

 

risk. The case plan shall allow a supervised individual options for

 

programming from which he or she may make a selection. If a

 

supervised individual exercises his or her option to choose

 

programming rather than having the programming selected by his or

 

her supervising officer, the selected programming shall not be less

 

rigorous than the programming which the supervised individual would

 

have otherwise been required to complete. A case plan developed

 

under this subdivision is subject to conditions of supervision, if

 

any, imposed by a court having jurisdiction over the supervised

 

individual.

 

     (e) The development of a case plan, based on the assessment

 

score, for each individual who is assessed to be low risk. The case

 

plan shall allow a supervised individual options for programming

 

from which he or she may make a selection. If a supervised

 

individual exercises his or her option to choose programming rather

 

than having the programming selected by his or her supervising

 

officer, the selected programming shall not be less rigorous than

 

the programming which the supervised individual would have

 

otherwise been required to complete. A case plan developed under

 

this subdivision is subject to conditions of supervision, if any,

 

imposed by a court having jurisdiction over the supervised

 

individual.

 

     (f) The identification of swift, certain, proportionate, and

 

graduated responses that an agency employee will apply in response


to a supervised individual's compliant and noncompliant behaviors.

 

     (g) The adoption of caseload guidelines that are based on

 

offender risk levels and take into account agency resources and

 

employee workload.

 

     (h) The establishment of protocols and standards that assess

 

the degree to which agency policies, procedures, programs, and

 

practices relating to offender recidivism reduction are evidence-

 

based.

 

     (3) Not more than 4 years after the effective date of this

 

act, all state funds expended on programs shall be for programs

 

that are in accordance with evidence-based practices or are

 

developed based upon evidence-based practices.

 

     (4) Not more then 4 years after the effective date of this

 

act, the agency shall eliminate supervision policies, procedures,

 

programs, and practices intended to reduce recidivism that

 

scientific research demonstrates do not reduce recidivism.

 

     Sec. 3. The agency shall adopt policies, rules, and

 

regulations that improve crime victim satisfaction with the

 

criminal justice system, including all of the following:

 

     (a) The payment by supervised individuals of victim

 

restitution and child support.

 

     (b) The opportunity for victims to complete victim impact

 

statements or provide input into presentence investigation reports.

 

     (c) Providing victims information about their rights and

 

services, and referrals to access those rights and services.

 

     (d) Offering victims the opportunity to complete a "victim

 

satisfaction survey" with data used to measure agency performance.


The department of the attorney general shall develop a victim

 

satisfaction survey for use by an agency under this subdivision.

 

     (e) Facilitating victim-offender dialogue when the victim is

 

willing.

 

     Sec. 4. (1) The agency shall provide its employees with

 

intensive initial and ongoing training and professional development

 

services to support the implementation of evidence-based practices.

 

     (2) The training and professional development services

 

provided under subsection (1) shall include assessment techniques,

 

case planning, risk reduction and intervention strategies,

 

effective communication skills, substance abuse intervention

 

information, and other topics identified by the agency or its

 

employees.

 

     Sec. 5. The department of corrections may form partnerships or

 

enter into contracts with institutions of higher education or other

 

qualified organizations for assistance with data collection,

 

analysis, and research.

 

     Sec. 6. (1) Beginning in 2017, by March 1 of each year the

 

agency shall submit to the governor, the secretary of the senate,

 

the clerk of the house of representatives, and the supreme court

 

administrative office a comprehensive report on its efforts to

 

implement this act. The report shall include all of the following:

 

     (a) The percentage and number of supervised individuals being

 

supervised in accordance with evidence-based practices.

 

     (b) The amount of state funds expended for programs that are

 

evidence-based.

 

     (c) A list of all programs, including an identification of all


programs that are evidence-based.

 

     (d) An identification of all supervision policies, procedures,

 

programs, and practices that were eliminated.

 

     (e) The results of victim satisfaction surveys administered

 

under section 3.

 

     (f) The agency's recommendations for resource allocation, and

 

any additional collaboration with other state, regional, or local

 

public agencies, private entities, or faith-based or community

 

organizations.

 

     (2) The agency shall make the full report required under

 

subsection (1) and an executive summary of that report available to

 

the general public on its website.

 

     Enacting section 1. This act takes effect 90 days after the

 

date it is enacted into law.