APPOINTMENT OF COUNTY AUDITORS

House Bill 5052 as introduced

Sponsor:  Rep. Jewell Jones

House Bill 5072 as introduced

Sponsor: Rep. Michael Webber

House Bill 5084 as introduced

Sponsor: Rep. Steve Marino

House Bill 5114 as introduced

Sponsor: Rep. Julie Calley

House Bill 5131 as introduced

Sponsor: Robert L. Kosowski

Committee:  Local Government

Complete to 11-7-17

SUMMARY:

House Bill 5052 would amend Public Act 275 of 1913, which governs the functions of boards of county auditors.  The remaining four bills would amend Michigan Election Law.  Taken together, the bills would allow county boards of commissioners to appoint boards of county auditors and remove references to election of county auditors from Michigan statute.

Currently, PA 275 provides that county auditors may be elected together as a board of not more than 3 members instead of individually.  However, as far as can be determined, no county in Michigan currently elects auditors.[1]  Rather, counties appoint auditors or contract with companies to provide oversight of county financial books and records.  Accordingly, HB 5052 is understood to codify current practice, by allowing a county board of commissioners to appoint a board of county auditors.   

House Bills 5072, 5084, 5114, and 5131 would make complementary changes to Michigan Election Law.  HBs 5072 and 5114 would remove county auditor from the list of offices voted upon in the primary and general election, respectively.  HB 5131 would amend the order in which elected offices are placed on the ballot, to remove “auditor in counties electing an auditor”.

HB 5084 would provide that, where county road commissioners currently deposit a bond with the board of county auditors, they would instead deposit the bond with the county treasurer (this is currently listed as an alternative if a county does not have auditors).  Additionally, the bill would repeal Chapter XI (County Auditors) of the Michigan Election Law.  That chapter applies only to counties electing county auditors by popular vote, a category which would be eliminated under the bill. 

The five bills are tie-barred together, meaning that none could take effect unless all are enacted.  The bills would take effect 90 days after enactment.

MCL 47.5 et al

FISCAL IMPACT:

The bills would have no fiscal impact on state or local governments.

                                                                                        Legislative Analyst:   Jenny McInerney

                                                                                                Fiscal Analyst:   Michael Cnossen

■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House Fiscal Agency staff for use by House members in their deliberations, and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.

---