STATE OF MICHIGAN
Journal of the Senate
100th Legislature
REGULAR SESSION OF 2020
Senate Chamber, Lansing, Wednesday, May 27,
2020.
10:00
a.m.
The
Senate was called to order by the President, Lieutenant Governor Garlin D.
Gilchrist II.
The
roll was called by the Secretary of the Senate, who announced that a quorum was
present.
Alexander—present Horn—present Outman—present
Ananich—present Irwin—present Polehanki—excused
Barrett—present Johnson—present Runestad—present
Bayer—present LaSata—present Santana—present
Bizon—present Lauwers—present Schmidt—present
Brinks—present Lucido—present Shirkey—present
Bullock—present MacDonald—excused Stamas—present
Bumstead—present MacGregor—present Theis—present
Chang—present McBroom—present VanderWall—present
Daley—present McCann—present Victory—present
Geiss—present McMorrow—present Wojno—present
Hertel—present Moss—present Zorn—present
Hollier—present Nesbitt—present
Senator
Stephanie Chang of the 1st District offered the following invocation:
The
road that lies ahead of us is a long one, and the pace of progress will
sometimes feel glacially slow. Never forget that glaciers over time can carve
out grand canyons and great lakes. Moving tectonic plates can rise up mountains
over millennia, or they can explode awe-inspiring volcanoes in milliseconds.
Our commitment to compassion and justice can do the same.
In a
world so filled with brokenness, sickness, division, and sorrow, it would be
easy to lose ourselves in never-ending grief, to be choked by our outrage, to
be paralyzed by the enormity of suffering, to feel our hearts squeeze tight
with hopelessness.
Instead,
this morning, let us simply breathe together as we hold our hearts open.
Breathing in as our hearts fill with compassion; breathing out as we pray for
healing in our world and in our lives. Breathing in, opening ourselves to the
transforming power of love; breathing out as we pray for peace in our world and
in our lives. Breathing in as we hold hope in our hearts; breathing out as we pray
for justice in our world and in our lives. Breathing in as we yearn for truth;
breathing out as we move toward unity and action.
May we
know our strength; may we be filled with courage; may our love flow from us
into this world.
Breathing
in, we are the prayer; breathing out, we are the healing. Breathing in, we are
the love; breathing out, we are the peace. Breathing in, we are the hope;
breathing out, we are the justice. Breathing in, we are the truth; breathing
out, we are unity.
May we
know our strength; may we be filled with courage; may our love flow from us
into this world.
Blessed
be, may it be so. Amen.
The President, Lieutenant Governor Gilchrist, led the
members of the Senate in recital of the Pledge
of Allegiance.
Motions and Communications
Senator
MacGregor moved that Senator Lauwers be temporarily excused from today’s
session.
The motion prevailed.
Senator
MacGregor moved that Senator MacDonald be excused from today’s session.
The motion prevailed.
Senator
Lauwers entered the Senate Chamber.
Senator
Chang moved that Senator Santana be temporarily excused from today’s session.
The motion prevailed.
Senator
Chang moved that Senator Polehanki be excused from today’s session.
The motion prevailed.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the
members serving voting therefor.
Messages from the Governor
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 21, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-96
Temporary requirement to suspend
certain activities that
are not necessary to sustain or protect life
Rescission of Executive Orders 2020-17,
2020-34, and 2020-92
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is a
respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is caused
by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and easily
spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department of
Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive cases
of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order 2020-4.
This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan under
section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency
Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended, MCL 30.401 et seq., and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945, 1945
PA 302, as amended, MCL 10.31 et seq.
Since then, the virus spread across
Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens of
thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and educational,
civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in response to the
widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed by the COVID-19
pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded on Executive
Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of disaster
across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan
Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency Powers of
the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that COVID-19 had
created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of Michigan, I
issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency declaration under the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as Executive Order 2020-68 to
issue new emergency and disaster declarations under the Emergency Management
Act.
The Emergency Management Act vests the
governor with broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or
the people of this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the
governor may implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives
having the force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)-(2). Similarly, the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945 provides that, after declaring a
state of emergency, “the governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and
regulations as he or she considers necessary to protect life and property or to
bring the emergency situation within the affected area under control.” MCL
10.31(1).
To suppress the spread of COVID-19, to
prevent the state’s health care system from being overwhelmed, to allow time
for the production of critical test kits, ventilators, and personal protective
equipment, to establish the public health infrastructure necessary to contain
the spread of infection, and to avoid needless deaths, it is reasonable and necessary
to direct residents to remain at home or in their place of residence to the
maximum extent feasible. To that end, on March 23, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-21, ordering all people in Michigan to stay home and stay safe. In
Executive Orders 2020-42, 2020-59, 2020-70, 2020‑77, and 2020-92, I
extended that initial order, modifying its scope as needed and appropriate to
match the ever-changing circumstances presented by this pandemic.
The measures put in place by these
executive orders have been effective: the number of new confirmed cases each
day has started to drop. Although the virus remains aggressive and
persistent—on May 20, 2020, Michigan reported 53,009 confirmed cases and 5,060
deaths—the strain on our health care system has begun to relent, even as our
testing capacity has increased. We can now start the process of gradually
resuming in‑person work and activities that were temporarily suspended
under my prior orders. In so doing, however, we must move with care, patience,
and vigilance, recognizing the grave harm that this virus continues to inflict
on our state and how quickly our progress in suppressing it can be undone.
With this order, I find it reasonable
and necessary to reaffirm the measures set forth in Executive Order 2020-92,
while also allowing gatherings of no more than ten people statewide, effective
immediately, and permitting retailers and motor vehicle dealerships to see
customers by appointment, beginning on May 26, 2020. In addition, because
our health-care capacity has improved with respect to personal protective
equipment, available beds, personnel, ventilators, and necessary supplies, I
find it reasonable to rescind Executive Orders 2020-17 and 2020-34, which
required health-care and veterinary facilities to implement plans to postpone
some medical and dental procedures. Those rescissions will take effect on May
29.
Acting under the Michigan Constitution
of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. This
order must be construed broadly to prohibit in-person work that is not
necessary to sustain or protect life.
2. For
purposes of this order, Michigan comprises eight separate regions:
(a) Region
1 includes the following counties: Monroe, Washtenaw, Livingston, Genesee,
Lapeer, Saint Clair, Oakland, Macomb, and Wayne.
(b) Region
2 includes the following counties: Mason, Lake, Osceola, Clare, Oceana,
Newaygo, Mecosta, Isabella, Muskegon, Montcalm, Ottawa, Kent, and Ionia.
(c) Region
3 includes the following counties: Allegan, Barry, Van Buren, Kalamazoo,
Calhoun, Berrien, Cass, Saint Joseph, and Branch.
(d) Region
4 includes the following counties: Oscoda, Alcona, Ogemaw, Iosco, Gladwin,
Arenac, Midland, Bay, Saginaw, Tuscola, Sanilac, and Huron.
(e) Region
5 includes the following counties: Gratiot, Clinton, Shiawassee, Eaton, and
Ingham.
(f) Region
6 includes the following counties: Manistee, Wexford, Missaukee, Roscommon,
Benzie, Grand Traverse, Kalkaska, Crawford, Leelanau, Antrim, Otsego,
Montmorency, Alpena, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Presque Isle, and Emmet.
(g) Region
7 includes the following counties: Hillsdale, Lenawee, and Jackson.
(h) Region
8 includes the following counties: Gogebic, Ontonagon, Houghton, Keweenaw,
Iron, Baraga, Dickinson, Marquette, Menominee, Delta, Alger, Schoolcraft, Luce,
Mackinac, and Chippewa.
3. Subject
to the exceptions in section 8 of this order, all individuals currently living
within the State of Michigan are ordered to stay at home or at their place of
residence. Subject to the same exceptions, all public and private gatherings of
any number of people occurring among persons not part of a single household are
prohibited.
4. All
individuals who leave their home or place of residence must adhere to social
distancing measures recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (“CDC”), including remaining at least six feet from people from
outside the individual’s household to the extent feasible under the
circumstances.
5. No
person or entity shall operate a business or conduct operations that require
workers to leave their homes or places of residence except to the extent that
those workers are necessary to sustain or protect life, to conduct minimum
basic operations, or to perform a resumed activity within the meaning of this
order.
(a) For
purposes of this order, workers who are necessary to sustain or protect life
are defined as “critical infrastructure workers,” as described in sections 9
and 10 of this order.
(b) For
purposes of this order, workers who are necessary to conduct minimum basic
operations are those whose in-person presence is strictly necessary to allow
the business or operation to maintain the value of inventory and equipment,
care for animals, ensure security, process transactions (including payroll and
employee benefits), or facilitate the ability of other workers to work
remotely.
Businesses and operations must
determine which of their workers are necessary to conduct minimum basic
operations and inform such workers of that designation. Businesses and
operations must make such designations in writing, whether by electronic
message, public website, or other appropriate means. Workers need not carry
copies of their designations when they leave the home or place of residence for
work.
Any in-person work necessary to conduct
minimum basic operations must be performed consistently with the social
distancing practices and other mitigation measures described in Executive Order
2020-97 and any orders that may follow from it.
(c) Workers
who perform resumed activities are defined in section 11 of this order.
6. Businesses
and operations that employ critical infrastructure workers or workers who
perform resumed activities may continue in-person operations, subject to the
following conditions:
(a) Consistent
with sections 9, 10, and 11 of this order, businesses and operations must
determine which of their workers are critical infrastructure workers or workers
who perform resumed activities and inform such workers of that designation.
Businesses and operations must make such designations in writing, whether by
electronic message, public website, or other appropriate means. Workers need
not carry copies of their designations when they leave the home or place of
residence for work. Businesses and operations need not designate:
(1) Workers in health care and public health.
(2) Workers who perform necessary government
activities, as described in section 7 of this order.
(3) Workers and volunteers described in section
10(d) of this order.
(b) In-person
activities that are not necessary to sustain or protect life or to perform a
resumed activity must be suspended.
(c) Businesses
and operations maintaining in-person activities must adopt social distancing
practices and other mitigation measures to protect workers and patrons, as
described in Executive Order 2020-97 and any orders that may follow from it.
(d) Any
business or operation that employs workers who perform resumed activities under
section 11(a) of this order, but that does not sell necessary supplies, may
sell any goods through remote sales via delivery or at the curbside. Such a
business or operation, however, must otherwise remain closed to the public.
7. All
in-person government activities at whatever level (state, county, or local) are
suspended unless:
(a) They
are performed by critical infrastructure workers, including workers in law
enforcement, public safety, and first responders, as defined in sections 9 and
10 of this order.
(b) They
are performed by workers who are permitted to resume work under section 11 of
this order.
(c) They
are necessary to support the activities of workers described in sections 9, 10,
and 11 of this order, or to enable transactions that support businesses or
operations that employ such workers.
(d) They
involve public transit, trash pick-up and disposal (including recycling and
composting), the management and oversight of elections, and the maintenance of
safe and sanitary public parks so as to allow for outdoor activity permitted
under this order.
(e) For
purposes of this order, necessary government activities include minimum basic
operations, as described in 5(b) of this order. Workers performing such
activities need not be designated.
(f) Any
in-person government activities must be performed consistently with the social
distancing practices and other mitigation measures to protect workers and
patrons described in Executive Order 2020‑97 and any orders that may
follow from it.
8. Exceptions.
(a) Individuals
may leave their home or place of residence, and travel as necessary:
(1) To engage in outdoor recreational activity,
consistent with remaining at least six feet from people from outside the
individual’s household. Outdoor recreational activity includes walking, hiking,
running, cycling, boating, golfing, or other similar activity, as well as any comparable
activity for those with limited mobility.
(2) To perform their jobs as critical
infrastructure workers after being so designated by their employers. (Critical
infrastructure workers who need not be designated under section 6(a) of this
order may leave their home for work without being designated.)
(3) To conduct minimum basic operations, as
described in section 5(b) of this order, after being designated to perform such
work by their employers.
(4) To perform resumed activities, as described in
section 11 of this order, after being designated to perform such work by their
employers.
(5) To perform necessary government activities, as
described in section 7 of this order.
(6) To perform tasks that are necessary to their
health and safety, or to the health and safety of their family or household
members (including pets). Individuals may, for example, leave the home or place
of residence to secure medication or to seek medical or dental care for
themselves or a household or family member.
(7) To obtain necessary services or supplies for
themselves, their family or household members, their pets, and their motor
vehicles.
(A) Individuals must secure such services or
supplies via delivery to the maximum extent possible. As needed, however,
individuals may leave the home or place of residence to purchase groceries,
take-out food, gasoline, needed medical supplies, and any other products
necessary to maintain the safety, sanitation, and basic operation of their
residences or motor vehicles.
(B) Individuals may also leave the home to pick up
or return a motor vehicle as permitted under section 10(i) of this order,
or to go to a motor vehicle dealership showroom by appointment, as permitted
under section 11(p) of this order.
(C) Individuals may leave the home to have a
bicycle repaired or maintained.
(D) Individuals should limit, to the maximum extent
that is safe and feasible, the number of household members who leave the home
for any errands.
(8) To pick up non-necessary supplies at the
curbside from a store that must otherwise remain closed to the public.
(9) To care for a family member or a family
member’s pet in another household.
(10) To care for minors, dependents, the elderly,
persons with disabilities, or other vulnerable persons.
(11) To visit an individual under the care of a
health care facility, residential care facility, or congregate care facility,
to the extent otherwise permitted.
(12) To visit a child in out-of-home care, or to
facilitate a visit between a parent and a child in out-of-home care, when there
is agreement between the child placing agency, the parent, and the caregiver
about a safe visitation plan, or when, failing such agreement, the individual
secures an exception from the executive director of the Children’s Services Agency.
(13) To attend legal proceedings or hearings for
essential or emergency purposes as ordered by a court.
(14) To work or volunteer for businesses or
operations (including both religious and secular nonprofit organizations) that
provide food, shelter, and other necessities of life for economically
disadvantaged or otherwise needy individuals, individuals who need assistance
as a result of this emergency, and people with disabilities.
(15) To attend a funeral, provided that no more than
10 people are in attendance.
(16) To attend a meeting of an addiction recovery
mutual aid society, provided that no more than 10 people are in attendance.
(17) To view a real-estate listing by appointment,
as permitted under section 11(g) of this order.
(18) To participate in training, credentialing, or
licensing activities permitted under section 11(i) of this order.
(19) For individuals in Regions 6 or 8, to go to a
restaurant or a retail store.
(20) To go to a retail store by appointment, as
permitted under section 11(q) of this order.
(21) To attend a social gathering of no more than 10
people.
(b) Individuals
may also travel:
(1) To return to a home or place of residence from
outside this state.
(2) To leave this state for a home or residence
elsewhere.
(3) Between two residences in this state, including
moving to a new residence.
(4) As required by law enforcement or a court
order, including the transportation of children pursuant to a custody
agreement.
(c) All
other travel is prohibited, including all travel to vacation rentals.
9. For
purposes of this order, critical infrastructure workers are those workers
described by the Director of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security
Agency in his guidance of March 19, 2020 on the COVID-19 response (available
here [https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CISA-Guidance-on-Essential-Critical-Infrastructure-Workers-1-20-508c.pdf]). This order does not adopt any
subsequent guidance document released by this same agency.
Consistent
with the March 19, 2020 guidance document, critical infrastructure workers
include some workers in each of the following sectors:
(a) Health
care and public health.
(b) Law
enforcement, public safety, and first responders.
(c) Food
and agriculture.
(d) Energy.
(e) Water
and wastewater.
(f) Transportation
and logistics.
(g) Public
works.
(h) Communications
and information technology, including news media.
(i) Other
community-based government operations and essential functions.
(j) Critical
manufacturing.
(k) Hazardous
materials.
(l) Financial services.
(m) Chemical
supply chains and safety.
(n) Defense
industrial base.
10. For
purposes of this order, critical infrastructure workers also include:
(a) Child
care workers (including workers at disaster relief child care centers), but
only to the extent necessary to serve the children or dependents of critical infrastructure
workers, workers who conduct minimum basic operations, workers who perform
necessary government activities, or workers who perform resumed activities.
This category includes individuals (whether licensed or not) who have arranged
to care for the children or dependents of such workers.
(b) Workers
at suppliers, distribution centers, or service providers, as described below.
(1) Any suppliers, distribution centers, or service
providers whose continued operation is necessary to enable, support, or
facilitate another business’s or operation’s critical infrastructure work may
designate their workers as critical infrastructure workers, provided that only
those workers whose in-person presence is necessary to enable, support, or
facilitate such work may be so designated.
(2) Any suppliers, distribution centers, or service
providers whose continued operation is necessary to enable, support, or
facilitate the necessary work of suppliers, distribution centers, or service
providers described in sub-provision (1) of this subsection may designate their
workers as critical infrastructure workers provided that only those workers
whose in-person presence is necessary to enable, support, or facilitate such
work may be so designated.
(3) Consistent with the scope of work permitted
under sub-provision (2) of this subsection, any suppliers, distribution
centers, or service providers further down the supply chain whose continued
operation is necessary to enable, support, or facilitate the necessary work of
other suppliers, distribution centers, or service providers may likewise
designate their workers as critical infrastructure workers, provided that only
those workers whose in-person presence is necessary to enable, support, or
facilitate such work may be so designated.
(4) Suppliers, distribution centers, and service
providers that abuse their designation authority under this subsection shall be
subject to sanctions to the fullest extent of the law.
(c) Workers
in the insurance industry, but only to the extent that their work cannot be
done by telephone or remotely.
(d) Workers
and volunteers for businesses or operations (including both religious and
secular nonprofit organizations) that provide food, shelter, and other
necessities of life for economically disadvantaged or otherwise needy
individuals, individuals who need assistance as a result of this emergency, and
people with disabilities.
(e) Workers
who perform critical labor union functions, including those who administer
health and welfare funds and those who monitor the well-being and safety of
union members who are critical infrastructure workers, provided that any
administration or monitoring should be done by telephone or remotely where
possible.
(f) Workers
at retail stores who sell groceries, medical supplies, and products necessary
to maintain the safety, sanitation, and basic operation of residences or motor
vehicles, including convenience stores, pet supply stores, auto supplies and
repair stores, hardware and home maintenance stores, and home appliance
retailers.
(g) Workers
at laundromats, coin laundries, and dry cleaners.
(h) Workers
at hotels and motels, provided that the hotels or motels do not offer
additional in-house amenities such as gyms, pools, spas, dining, entertainment
facilities, meeting rooms, or like facilities.
(i) Workers
at motor vehicle dealerships who are necessary to facilitate remote and
electronic sales or leases, or to deliver motor vehicles to customers, provided
that showrooms remain closed to in-person traffic until May 26, 2020 at 12:01
a.m.
11. For
purposes of this order, workers who perform resumed activities are defined as
follows:
(a) Workers
who process or fulfill remote orders for goods for delivery or curbside
pick-up.
(b) Workers
who perform bicycle maintenance or repair.
(c) Workers
for garden stores, nurseries, and lawn care, pest control, and landscaping
operations.
(d) Workers
for moving or storage operations.
(e) Workers
who perform work that is traditionally and primarily performed outdoors, including
but not limited to forestry workers, outdoor power equipment technicians,
parking enforcement workers, and outdoor workers at places of outdoor
recreation not otherwise closed under Executive Order 2020-69 or any order that
may follow from it.
(f) Workers
in the construction industry, including workers in the building trades
(plumbers, electricians, HVAC technicians, and similar workers).
(g) Workers
in the real-estate industry, including agents, appraisers, brokers, inspectors,
surveyors, and registers of deeds, provided that:
(1) Any showings, inspections, appraisals,
photography or videography, or final walk-throughs must be performed by
appointment and must be limited to no more than four people on the premises at
any one time. No in-person open houses are permitted.
(2) Private showings may only be arranged for
owner-occupied homes, vacant homes, vacant land, commercial property, and
industrial property.
(h) Workers
necessary to the manufacture of goods that support workplace modification to
forestall the spread of COVID-19 infections.
(i) Workers
necessary to train, credential, and license first responders (e.g., police
officers, fire fighters, paramedics) and health-care workers, including
certified nursing assistants, provided that as much instruction as possible is
provided remotely.
(j) Workers
necessary to perform manufacturing activities. Manufacturing work may not
commence under this subsection until the facility at which the work will be
performed has been prepared to follow the workplace safeguards described in
section 4 of Executive Order 2020-97 and any orders that may follow from it.
(k) Workers
necessary to conduct research activities in a laboratory setting.
(l) For Regions 6 and 8, beginning at 12:01 a.m. on
May 22, 2020, workers necessary to perform retail activities. For purposes of
this order, retail activities are defined:
(1) As the selling of goods and the rendering of
services incidental to the sale of the goods (e.g., any packaging and
processing to allow for or facilitate the sale and delivery of the goods).
(2) To exclude those places of public accommodation
that are closed under Executive Order 2020-69 and any orders that may follow
from it.
(m) For
Regions 6 and 8, beginning at 12:01 a.m. on May 22, 2020, workers who work in
an office setting, but only to the extent that such work is not capable of
being performed remotely.
(n) For
Regions 6 and 8, beginning at 12:01 a.m. on May 22, 2020, workers in
restaurants or bars, subject to the capacity constraints and workplace
standards described in Executive Order 2020-97. Nothing in this subsection
should be taken to abridge or otherwise modify the existing power of a local
government to impose further restrictions on restaurants or bars. For
restaurants and bars subject to this subsection, this subsection supersedes the
limitations placed on those restaurants and bars by Executive Order 2020-69 and
any order that may follow from it.
(o) Workers
necessary to prepare a workplace to follow the workplace standards described in
Executive Order 2020-97 and to otherwise ready the workplace for reopening.
(p) Beginning
at 12:01 a.m. on May 26, 2020, workers at motor vehicle dealerships, provided
that showrooms are open only by appointment.
(q) Beginning
at 12:01 a.m. on May 26, 2020, workers necessary to perform retail activities
by appointment, provided that the store is limited to 10 customers at any one
time. For purposes of this order, retail activities are defined:
(1) As the selling of goods and the rendering of
services incidental to the sale of the goods (e.g., any packaging and
processing to allow for or facilitate the sale and delivery of the goods).
(2) To exclude those places of public accommodation
that are closed under Executive Order 2020-69 and any orders that may follow
from it.
(r) Consistent
with section 10(b) of this order, workers at suppliers, distribution centers,
or service providers whose in-person presence is necessary to enable, support,
or facilitate another business’s or operation’s resumed activities, including
workers at suppliers, distribution centers, or service providers along the
supply chain whose in-person presence is necessary to enable, support, or
facilitate the necessary work of another supplier, distribution center, or
service provider in enabling, supporting, or facilitating another business’s or
operation’s resumed activities. Suppliers, distribution centers, and service
providers that abuse their designation authority under this subsection shall be
subject to sanctions to the fullest extent of the law.
12. Any
store that is open for in-store sales under section 10(f), section 11(c), or
section 11(q) of this executive order:
(a) May
continue to sell goods other than necessary supplies if the sale of such goods
is in the ordinary course of business.
(b) Must
consider establishing curbside pick-up to reduce in-store traffic and mitigate
outdoor lines.
13. No
one shall rent a short-term vacation property except as necessary to assist in
housing a health care professional aiding in the response to the COVID-19
pandemic or a volunteer who is aiding the same.
14. Michigan
state parks remain open for day use, subject to any reductions in services and
specific closures that, in the judgment of the director of the Department of
Natural Resources, are necessary to minimize large gatherings and to prevent
the spread of COVID-19.
15. Rules
governing face coverings.
(a) Except
as provided in subsection (b) of this section, any individual able to medically
tolerate a face covering must wear a covering over his or her nose and
mouth—such as a homemade mask, scarf, bandana, or handkerchief—when in any
enclosed public space.
(b) An
individual may be required to temporarily remove a face covering upon entering
an enclosed public space for identification purposes. An individual may also
remove a face covering while seated at a restaurant or bar.
(c) All
businesses and operations whose workers perform in-person work must, at a
minimum, provide non-medical grade face coverings to their workers.
(d) Supplies
of N95 masks and surgical masks should generally be reserved, for now, for
health care professionals, first responders (e.g., police officers, fire
fighters, paramedics), and other critical workers who interact with the public.
(e) The
protections against discrimination in the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, 1976
PA 453, as amended, MCL 37.2101 et seq.,
and any other protections against discrimination in Michigan law, apply in full
force to individuals who wear a face covering under this order.
16. Except
as otherwise expressly stated in this order, nothing in this order should be
taken to supersede another executive order or directive that is in effect,
except to the extent this order imposes more stringent limitations on in-person
work, activities, and interactions. Consistent with prior guidance, neither a
place of religious worship nor its owner is subject to penalty under section 22
of this order for allowing religious worship at such place. No individual is
subject to penalty under section 22 of this order for engaging in or traveling
to engage in religious worship at a place of religious worship, or for
violating section 15(a) of this order.
17. Nothing
in this order should be taken to interfere with or infringe on the powers of
the legislative and judicial branches to perform their constitutional duties or
exercise their authority. Similarly, nothing in this order shall be taken to
abridge protections guaranteed by the state or federal constitution under these
emergency circumstances.
18. This
order takes effect immediately, unless otherwise specified in this order, and
continues through May 28, 2020 at 11:59 p.m.
19. Executive
Order 2020-17, which imposed temporary requirements regarding the postponement
of non-essential medical and dental procedures, is rescinded as of May 28, 2020
at 11:59 p.m. Executive Order 2020-34, which imposed temporary
requirements regarding the postponement of veterinary services, is rescinded as
of May 28, 2020 at 11:59 p.m. Outpatient health-care facilities, including
veterinary offices, are subject to the workplace safety rules described in
Executive Order 2020-97.
20. Executive
Orders 2020-92 is rescinded. All references to that order in other executive
orders, agency rules, letters of understanding, or other legal authorities
shall be taken to refer to this order.
21. I
will evaluate the continuing need for this order prior to its expiration. In
determining whether to maintain, intensify, or relax its restrictions, I will
consider, among other things, (1) data on COVID-19 infections and the disease’s
rate of spread; (2) whether sufficient medical personnel, hospital beds, and
ventilators exist to meet anticipated medical need; (3) the availability of
personal protective equipment for the health care workforce; (4) the state’s
capacity to test for COVID-19 cases and isolate infected people; and (5)
economic conditions in the state.
22. Consistent
with MCL 10.33 and MCL 30.405(3), a willful violation of this order is a
misdemeanor.
Given under my hand and the Great Seal
of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 21, 2020
Time: 9:49 a.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 21, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-97
Safeguards to protect Michigan’s
workers from COVID-19
Rescission of Executive Order 2020-91
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is a
respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is caused
by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and easily
spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department of
Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive cases
of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order 2020-4.
This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan under
section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency
Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended, MCL 30.401 et seq., and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945, 1945
PA 302, as amended, MCL 10.31 et seq.
Since then, the virus spread across
Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens of
thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and educational,
civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in response to the
widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed by the COVID-19
pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded on Executive
Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of disaster
across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan
Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency Powers of
the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that COVID-19 had
created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of Michigan, I
issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency declaration under the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as Executive Order 2020-68 to
issue new emergency and disaster declarations under the Emergency Management
Act.
The Emergency Management Act vests the
governor with broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or
the people of this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the
governor may implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives
having the force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)-(2). Similarly, the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945 provides that, after declaring a
state of emergency, “the governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and
regulations as he or she considers necessary to protect life and property or to
bring the emergency situation within the affected area under control.” MCL
10.31(1).
To suppress the spread of COVID-19, to
prevent the state’s health care system from being overwhelmed, to allow time
for the production of critical test kits, ventilators, and personal protective
equipment, to establish the public health infrastructure necessary to contain
the spread of infection, and to avoid needless deaths, it is reasonable and necessary
to direct residents to remain at home or in their place of residence to the
maximum extent feasible. To that end, on March 23, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-21, ordering all people in Michigan to stay home and stay safe. In
Executive Orders 2020-42, 2020-59, 2020-70, 2020‑77, and 2020-92, I
extended that initial order, modifying its scope as needed and appropriate to
match the ever-changing circumstances presented by this pandemic.
The measures put in place by these
executive orders have been effective: the number of new confirmed cases each
day has started to drop. Although the virus remains aggressive and
persistent—on May 20, 2020, Michigan reported 53,009 confirmed cases and 5,060
deaths—the strain on our health care system has begun to relent, even as our
testing capacity has increased. We have now begun the process of gradually
resuming in-person work and activities that were temporarily suspended under my
prior orders. In so doing, however, we must move with care, patience, and
vigilance, recognizing the grave harm that this virus continues to inflict on
our state and how quickly our progress in suppressing it can be undone.
In particular, businesses must do their
part to protect their employees, their patrons, and their communities. Many
businesses have already done so by implementing robust safeguards to prevent
viral transmission. But we can and must do more: no one should feel unsafe at
work. With Executive Order 2020-91, I created an enforceable set of workplace
standards that apply to all businesses across the state. I am now amending
those standards to include new provisions governing outpatient health-care
facilities.
Acting under the Michigan Constitution
of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. All
businesses or operations that are permitted to require their employees to leave
the homes or residences for work under Executive Order 2020-92, and any order
that follows it, must, at a minimum:
(a) Develop
a COVID-19 preparedness and response plan, consistent with recommendations in
Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19, developed by the Occupational
Health and Safety Administration and available here [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3990.pdf]. By June 1, 2020, or within two
weeks of resuming in-person activities, whichever is later, a business’s or
operation’s plan must be made readily available to employees, labor unions, and
customers, whether via website, internal network, or by hard copy.
(b) Designate
one or more worksite supervisors to implement, monitor, and report on the
COVID-19 control strategies developed under subsection (a). The supervisor must
remain on-site at all times when employees are present on site. An on-site
employee may be designated to perform the supervisory role.
(c) Provide
COVID-19 training to employees that covers, at a minimum:
(1) Workplace infection-control practices.
(2) The proper use of personal protective
equipment.
(3) Steps the employee must take to notify the
business or operation of any symptoms of COVID-19 or a suspected or confirmed
diagnosis of COVID-19.
(4) How to report unsafe working conditions.
(d) Conduct
a daily entry self-screening protocol for all employees or contractors entering
the workplace, including, at a minimum, a questionnaire covering symptoms and
suspected or confirmed exposure to people with possible COVID-19.
(e) Keep
everyone on the worksite premises at least six feet from one another to the
maximum extent possible, including through the use of ground markings, signs,
and physical barriers, as appropriate to the worksite.
(f) Provide
non-medical grade face coverings to their employees, with supplies of N95 masks
and surgical masks reserved, for now, for health care professionals, first
responders (e.g., police officers, fire fighters, paramedics), and other
critical workers.
(g) Require
face coverings to be worn when employees cannot consistently maintain six feet
of separation from other individuals in the workplace, and consider face
shields when employees cannot consistently maintain three feet of separation
from other individuals in the workplace.
(h) Increase
facility cleaning and disinfection to limit exposure to COVID-19, especially on
high-touch surfaces (e.g., door handles), paying special attention to parts,
products, and shared equipment (e.g., tools, machinery, vehicles).
(i) Adopt
protocols to clean and disinfect the facility in the event of a positive
COVID-19 case in the workplace.
(j) Make
cleaning supplies available to employees upon entry and at the worksite and
provide time for employees to wash hands frequently or to use hand sanitizer.
(k) When
an employee is identified with a confirmed case of COVID-19, within 24 hours,
notify both:
(1) The local public health department, and
(2) Any co-workers, contractors, or suppliers who
may have come into contact with the person with a confirmed case of COVID-19.
(l) An employer will allow employees with a
confirmed or suspected case of COVID-19 to return to the workplace only after
they are no longer infectious according to the latest guidelines from the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”).
(m) Follow
Executive Order 2020-36, and any executive orders that follow it, that prohibit
discharging, disciplining, or otherwise retaliating against employees who stay
home or who leave work when they are at particular risk of infecting others
with COVID-19.
(n) Establish
a response plan for dealing with a confirmed infection in the workplace,
including protocols for sending employees home and for temporary closures of
all or part of the worksite to allow for deep cleaning.
(o) Restrict
business-related travel for employees to essential travel only.
(p) Encourage
employees to use personal protective equipment and hand sanitizer on public
transportation.
(q) Promote
remote work to the fullest extent possible.
(r) Adopt
any additional infection-control measures that are reasonable in light of the
work performed at the worksite and the rate of infection in the surrounding
community.
2. Businesses
or operations whose work is primarily and traditionally performed outdoors
must:
(a) Prohibit
gatherings of any size in which people cannot maintain six feet of distance
from one another.
(b) Limit
in-person interaction with clients and patrons to the maximum extent possible,
and bar any such interaction in which people cannot maintain six feet of
distance from one another.
(c) Provide
and require the use of personal protective equipment such as gloves, goggles, face
shields, and face coverings, as appropriate for the activity being performed.
(d) Adopt
protocols to limit the sharing of tools and equipment to the maximum extent
possible and to ensure frequent and thorough cleaning and disinfection of
tools, equipment, and frequently touched surfaces.
3. Businesses
or operations in the construction industry must:
(a) Conduct
a daily entry screening protocol for employees, contractors, suppliers, and any
other individuals entering a worksite, including a questionnaire covering
symptoms and suspected or confirmed exposure to people with possible COVID-19,
together with, if possible, a temperature screening.
(b) Create
dedicated entry point(s) at every worksite, if possible, for daily screening as
provided in sub‑provision (b) of this section, or in the alternative
issue stickers or other indicators to employees to show that they received a
screening before entering the worksite that day.
(c) Provide
instructions for the distribution of personal protective equipment and
designate on-site locations for soiled face coverings.
(d) Require
the use of work gloves where appropriate to prevent skin contact with
contaminated surfaces.
(e) Identify
choke points and high-risk areas where employees must stand near one another (such
as hallways, hoists and elevators, break areas, water stations, and buses) and
control their access and use (including through physical barriers) so that
social distancing is maintained.
(f) Ensure
there are sufficient hand-washing or hand-sanitizing stations at the worksite
to enable easy access by employees.
(g) Notify
contractors (if a subcontractor) or owners (if a contractor) of any confirmed
COVID-19 cases among employees at the worksite.
(h) Restrict
unnecessary movement between project sites.
(i) Create
protocols for minimizing personal contact upon delivery of materials to the
worksite.
4. Manufacturing
facilities must:
(a) Conduct
a daily entry screening protocol for employees, contractors, suppliers, and any
other individuals entering the facility, including a questionnaire covering
symptoms and suspected or confirmed exposure to people with possible COVID-19,
together with temperature screening as soon as no-touch thermometers can be
obtained.
(b) Create
dedicated entry point(s) at every facility for daily screening as provided in
sub-provision (a) of this section, and ensure physical barriers are in place to
prevent anyone from bypassing the screening.
(c) Suspend
all non-essential in-person visits, including tours.
(d) Train
employees on, at a minimum:
(1) Routes by which the virus causing COVID-19 is
transmitted from person to person.
(2) Distance that the virus can travel in the air,
as well as the time it remains viable in the air and on environmental surfaces.
(3) The use of personal protective equipment,
including the proper steps for putting it on and taking it off.
(e) Reduce
congestion in common spaces wherever practicable by, for example, closing salad
bars and buffets within cafeterias and kitchens, requiring individuals to sit
at least six feet from one another, placing markings on the floor to allow
social distancing while standing in line, offering boxed food via delivery or
pick-up points, and reducing cash payments.
(f) Implement
rotational shift schedules where possible (e.g., increasing the number of
shifts, alternating days or weeks) to reduce the number of employees in the
facility at the same time.
(g) Stagger
meal and break times, as well as start times at each entrance, where possible.
(h) Install
temporary physical barriers, where practicable, between work stations and
cafeteria tables.
(i) Create
protocols for minimizing personal contact upon delivery of materials to the
facility.
(j) Adopt
protocols to limit the sharing of tools and equipment to the maximum extent
possible.
(k) Ensure
there are sufficient hand-washing or hand-sanitizing stations at the worksite
to enable easy access by employees, and discontinue use of hand dryers.
(l) Notify plant leaders and potentially exposed
individuals upon identification of a positive case of COVID-19 in the facility,
as well as maintain a central log for symptomatic employees or employees who
received a positive test for COVID-19.
(m) Send
potentially exposed individuals home upon identification of a positive case of
COVID-19 in the facility.
(n) Require
employees to self-report to plant leaders as soon as possible after developing
symptoms of COVID-19.
(o) Shut
areas of the manufacturing facility for cleaning and disinfection, as
necessary, if an employee goes home because he or she is displaying symptoms of
COVID-19.
5. Research
laboratories, but not laboratories that perform diagnostic testing, must:
(a) Assign
dedicated entry point(s) and/or times into lab buildings.
(b) Conduct
a daily entry screening protocol for employees, contractors, suppliers, and any
other individuals entering a worksite, including a questionnaire covering
symptoms and suspected or confirmed exposure to people with possible COVID-19,
together with, if possible, a temperature screening.
(c) Create
protocols and/or checklists as necessary to conform to the facility’s COVID-19
preparedness and response plan under section 1(a).
(d) Suspend
all non-essential in-person visitors (including visiting scholars and
undergraduate students) until further notice.
(e) Establish
and implement a plan for distributing face coverings.
(f) Limit
the number of people per square feet of floor space permitted in a particular
laboratory at one time.
(g) Close
open workspaces, cafeterias, and conference rooms.
(h) As
necessary, use tape on the floor to demarcate socially distanced workspaces and
to create one-way traffic flow.
(i) Require
all office and dry lab work to be conducted remotely.
(j) Minimize
the use of shared lab equipment and shared lab tools and create protocols for
disinfecting lab equipment and lab tools.
(k) Provide
disinfecting supplies and require employees to wipe down their work stations at
least twice daily.
(l) Implement an audit and compliance procedure to
ensure that cleaning criteria are followed.
(m) Establish
a clear reporting process for any symptomatic individual or any individual with
a confirmed case of COVID-19, including the notification of lab leaders and the
maintenance of a central log.
(n) Clean
and disinfect the work site when an employee is sent home with symptoms or with
a confirmed case of COVID-19.
(o) Send
any potentially exposed co-workers home if there is a positive case in the
facility.
(p) Restrict
all non-essential work travel, including in-person conference events.
6. Retail
stores that are open for in-store sales must:
(a) Create
communications material for customers (e.g., signs or pamphlets) to inform them
of changes to store practices and to explain the precautions the store is taking
to prevent infection.
(b) Establish
lines to regulate entry in accordance with subsection (c) of this section, with
markings for patrons to enable them to stand at least six feet apart from one
another while waiting. Stores should also explore alternatives to lines,
including by allowing customers to wait in their cars for a text message or
phone call, to enable social distancing and to accommodate seniors and those
with disabilities.
(c) Adhere
to the following restrictions:
(1) For stores of less than 50,000 square feet of
customer floor space, must limit the number of people in the store (including
employees) to 25% of the total occupancy limits established by the State Fire
Marshal or a local fire marshal. Stores of more than 50,000 square feet must:
(A) Limit the number of customers in the store at
one time (excluding employees) to 4 people per 1,000 square feet of
customer floor space.
(B) Create at least two hours per week of dedicated
shopping time for vulnerable populations, which for purposes of this order are
people over 60, pregnant women, and those with chronic conditions like heart
disease, diabetes, and lung disease.
(2) The director of the Department of Health and
Human Services is authorized to issue an emergency order varying the capacity
limits described in this subsection as necessary to protect the public health.
(d) Post
signs at store entrance(s) instructing customers of their legal obligation to
wear a face covering when inside the store.
(e) Post
signs at store entrance(s) informing customers not to enter if they are or have
recently been sick.
(f) Design
spaces and store activities in a manner that encourages employees and customers
to maintain six feet of distance from one another.
(g) Install
physical barriers at checkout or other service points that require interaction,
including plexiglass barriers, tape markers, or tables, as appropriate.
(h) Establish
an enhanced cleaning and sanitizing protocol for high-touch areas like
restrooms, credit-card machines, keypads, counters, shopping carts, and other
surfaces.
(i) Train
employees on:
(1) Appropriate cleaning procedures, including
training for cashiers on cleaning between customers.
(2) How to manage symptomatic customers upon entry
or in the store.
(j) Notify
employees if the employer learns that an individual (including a customer or
supplier) with a confirmed case of COVID-19 has visited the store.
(k) Limit
staffing to the minimum number necessary to operate.
7. Offices
must:
(a) Assign
dedicated entry point(s) for all employees to reduce congestion at the main
entrance.
(b) Provide
visual indicators of appropriate spacing for employees outside the building in
case of congestion.
(c) Take
steps to reduce entry congestion and to ensure the effectiveness of screening
(e.g., by staggering start times, adopting a rotational schedule in only half
of employees are in the office at a particular time).
(d) Require
face coverings in shared spaces, including during in-person meetings and in
restrooms and hallways.
(e) Increase
distancing between employees by spreading out workspaces, staggering workspace
usage, restricting non-essential common space (e.g., cafeterias), providing
visual cues to guide movement and activity (e.g., restricting elevator capacity
with markings, locking conference rooms).
(f) Turn
off water fountains.
(g) Prohibit
social gatherings and meetings that do not allow for social distancing or that
create unnecessary movement through the office.
(h) Provide
disinfecting supplies and require employees wipe down their work stations at
least twice daily.
(i) Post
signs about the importance of personal hygiene.
(j) Disinfect
high-touch surfaces in offices (e.g., whiteboard markers, restrooms, handles)
and minimize shared items when possible (e.g., pens, remotes, whiteboards).
(k) Institute
cleaning and communications protocols when employees are sent home with
symptoms.
(l) Notify employees if the employer learns that an
individual (including a customer, supplier, or visitor) with a confirmed case
of COVID-19 has visited the office.
(m) Suspend
all nonessential visitors.
(n) Restrict
all non-essential travel, including in-person conference events.
8. Restaurants
and bars must:
(a) Limit
capacity to 50% of normal seating.
(b) Require
six feet of separation between parties or groups at different tables or bar
tops (e.g., spread tables out, use every other table, remove or put up chairs
or barstools that are not in use).
(c) Create
communications material for customers (e.g., signs, pamphlets) to inform them
of changes to restaurant or bar practices and to explain the precautions that
are being taken to prevent infection.
(d) Close
waiting areas and ask customers to wait in cars for a call when their table is
ready.
(e) Close
self-serve food or drink options, such as buffets, salad bars, and drink
stations.
(f) Provide
physical guides, such as tape on floors or sidewalks and signage on walls to
ensure that customers remain at least six feet apart in any lines.
(g) Post
sign(s) at store entrance(s) informing customers not to enter if they are or
have recently been sick.
(h) Post
sign(s) instructing customers to wear face coverings until they get to their
table.
(i) Require
hosts and servers to wear face coverings in the dining area.
(j) Require
employees to wear face coverings and gloves in the kitchen area when handling
food, consistent with guidelines from the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”).
(k) Limit
shared items for customers (e.g., condiments, menus) and clean high-contact
areas after each customer (e.g., tables, chairs, menus, payment tools,
condiments).
(l) Train employees on:
(1) Appropriate use of personal protective
equipment in conjunction with food safety guidelines.
(2) Food safety health protocols (e.g., cleaning
between customers, especially shared condiments).
(3) How to manage symptomatic customers upon entry
or in the restaurant.
(m) Notify
employees if the employer learns that an individual (including an employee,
customer, or supplier) with a confirmed case of COVID-19 has visited the store.
(n) Close
restaurant immediately if an employee shows multiple symptoms of COVID-19
(fever, atypical shortness of breath, atypical cough) and perform a deep clean,
consistent with guidance from the FDA and the CDC. Such cleaning may occur
overnight.
(o) Install
physical barriers, such as sneeze guards and partitions at cash registers,
bars, host stands, and other areas where maintaining physical distance of six
feet is difficult.
(p) To
the maximum extent possible, limit the number of employees in shared spaces,
including kitchens, break rooms, and offices, to maintain at least a six-foot
distance between employees.
9. Outpatient
health-care facilities, including clinics, primary care physician offices, or
dental offices, and also including veterinary clinics, must:
(a) Post
signs at entrance(s) instructing patients to wear a face covering when inside.
(b) Limit
waiting-area occupancy to the number of individuals who can be present while
staying six feet away from one another and ask patients, if possible, to wait
in cars for their appointment to be called.
(c) Mark
waiting rooms to enable six feet of social distancing (e.g., by placing X’s on
the ground and/or removing seats in the waiting room).
(d) Enable
contactless sign-in (e.g., sign in on phone app) as soon as practicable.
(e) Add
special hours for highly vulnerable patients, including the elderly and those
with chronic conditions.
(f) Conduct
a common screening protocol for all patients, including a temperature check and
questions about COVID-19 symptoms.
(g) Place
hand sanitizer and face coverings at patient entrance(s).
(h) Require
employees to make proper use of personal protective equipment in accordance
with guidance from the CDC and the U.S. Occupational Health and Safety
Administration.
(i) Require
patients to wear a face covering when in the facility, except as necessary for
identification or to facilitate an examination or procedure.
(j) Install
physical barriers at sign-in, temperature screening, or other service points
that normally require personal interaction (e.g., plexiglass, cardboard,
tables).
(k) Employ
telehealth and telemedicine to the greatest extent possible.
(l) Limit the number of appointments to maintain
social distancing and allow adequate time between appointments for cleaning.
(m) Employ
specialized procedures for patients with high temperatures or respiratory
symptoms (e.g., special entrances, having them wait in their car) to avoid
exposing other patients in the waiting room.
(n) Deep
clean examination rooms after patients with respiratory symptoms and clean
rooms between all patients.
(o) Establish
procedures for building disinfection in accordance with CDC guidance if it is
suspected that an employee or patient has COVID-19 or if there is a confirmed
case.
10. Employers
must maintain a record of the requirements set forth in Sections 1(c), (d), and
(k).
11. The
rules described in sections 1 through 10 have the force and effect of
regulations adopted by the departments and agencies with responsibility for
overseeing compliance with workplace health-and-safety standards and are fully
enforceable by such agencies. Any challenge to penalties imposed by a
department or agency for violating any of the rules described in sections 1
through 10 of this order will proceed through the same administrative review
process as any challenge to a penalty imposed by the department or agency for a
violation of its rules.
12. Any
business or operation that violates the rules in sections 1 through 10 has
failed to provide a place of employment that is free from recognized hazards
that are causing, or are likely to cause, death or serious physical harm to an
employee, within the meaning of the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health
Act, MCL 408.1011.
13. Nothing
in this order shall be taken to limit or affect any rights or remedies
otherwise available under law.
Given under my hand and the Great Seal
of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 21, 2020
Time: 9:49 a.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 22, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-98
Declaration of State of Emergency
On May 19, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-94 declaring a state of emergency for the city of Midland and the
county of Midland due to severe flooding as a result of the failure of the
Edenville and Sanford Dam structures along the Tittabawassee River. This event
has also caused severe flooding in Arenac, Gladwin, and Saginaw counties.
In response, the counties of Arenac,
Gladwin, and Saginaw have taken several actions that include declaring a local
state of emergency; activating disaster response and recovery operations;
evacuating and providing shelter to affected residents; and issuing emergency
public information. The assistance of voluntary organizations and the state are
required to protect public health, safety, and property, and to lessen or avert
more severe and lasting harm to the community.
Despite these measures, local resources
are insufficient to respond to the extreme flooding under the current
conditions. State assistance and other outside resources are necessary to
effectively respond to, and recover from, the impacts of flooding.
Under the Emergency Management Act,
1976 PA 390, MCL 30.403(4), “[t]he governor shall, by executive order or
proclamation, declare a state of emergency if he or she finds that an emergency
has occurred or that the threat of an emergency exists.” Therefore, acting
under the Michigan Constitution of 1963 and Michigan law, including the
Emergency Management Act, 1976 PA 390, MCL 30.401 to 30.421, I find it
reasonable and necessary to amend and expand Executive Order 2020-94, and order
the following:
1. In
addition to the city of Midland and the county of Midland, a state of emergency
is also declared for the counties of Arenac, Gladwin, and Saginaw.
2. Any
emergency order issued in response to the COVID-19 crisis is temporarily
suspended in these counties to the extent such order impedes the emergency
response effort under this declaration.
3. The
Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division of the Department of State Police
shall coordinate and augment all state efforts and may call upon all state
departments to utilize available resources to assist in the designated area
pursuant to the Michigan Emergency Management Plan.
The state of emergency is terminated at
such time as the threats to public health, safety, and property caused by the
emergency no longer exist, and appropriate programs have been implemented to
recover from the effects of this emergency, but in no case later than June 16,
2020, unless extended as provided by 1976 Public Act 390, as amended.
Date: May 22, 2020
Time: 3:42 p.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 26, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-99
Declaration of state of emergency and
state of disaster related to the COVID-19
pandemic
On March 10, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-4, which declared a state of emergency in Michigan to address the
COVID-19 pandemic. This new disease, caused by a novel coronavirus not
previously identified in humans, can easily spread from person to person and
can result in serious illness or death. There is currently no approved vaccine
or antiviral treatment.
Scarcely three weeks later, the virus
had spread across Michigan. As of April 1, 2020, the state had 9,334 confirmed
cases of COVID-19 and 337 deaths from the disease, with many thousands more
infected but not yet tested. Exactly one month later, this number had ballooned
to 42,356 confirmed cases and 3,866 deaths from the disease—a tenfold
increase in deaths. The virus’s rapid and relentless spread threatened to
overwhelm the state’s health care system: hospitals in multiple counties were
reportedly at or near capacity; medical personnel, supplies, and resources
necessary to treat COVID-19 patients were in high demand but short supply;
dormitories and a convention center were being converted to temporary field
hospitals.
On April 1, 2020, in response to the
widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed by the COVID-19
pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded on Executive
Order 2020‑4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of
disaster across the state of Michigan. Like Executive Order 2020-4, this
declaration was based on multiple independent authorities: section 1 of article
5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963; the Emergency Management Act, 1976 PA 390,
as amended, MCL 30.401 et seq.; and
the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945, 1945 PA 302, as amended, MCL
10.31 et seq. On April 7, 2020, the
Michigan legislature adopted a concurrent resolution to extend the states of
emergency and disaster declared under the Emergency Management Act until April
30, 2020.
On April 30, 2020, finding that
COVID-19 had created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of
Michigan, I issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency
declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as
Executive Order 2020-68 to issue new emergency and disaster declarations under
the Emergency Management Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of
Representatives and Michigan Senate v Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the
Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order 2020-67 is a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act but that Executive
Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency
Management Act. Both of those rulings are likely to be appealed.
Since I first declared an emergency in
response to this pandemic, my administration has taken aggressive measures to
fight the spread of COVID-19, prevent the rapid depletion of this state’s
critical health care resources, and avoid needless deaths. The best way to slow
the spread of the virus is for people to stay home and keep their distance from
others. To that end, and in keeping with the recommendations of public health
experts, I have issued orders restricting access to places of public
accommodation and school buildings, limiting gatherings and travel, and
requiring workers who are not necessary to sustain or protect life to remain at
home. I have also issued orders enhancing the operational capacity and
efficiency of health care facilities and operations, allowing health care
professionals to practice to the full extent of their training regardless of
licensure, and facilitating the delivery of goods, supplies, equipment, and personnel
that are needed to combat this pandemic. And I have taken steps to begin
building the public health infrastructure in this state that is necessary to
contain the infection.
My administration has also moved
quickly to mitigate the economic and social harms of this pandemic. Through my
orders, we have placed strict rules on businesses to prevent price gouging, put
a temporary hold on evictions for families that cannot make their rent,
expanded eligibility for unemployment benefits, provided protections to workers
who stay home when they or their close contacts are sick, and created a
structure through which our schools can continue to provide their students with
the highest level of educational opportunities possible under the difficult
circumstances now before us.
These statewide measures have been
effective, but the need for them—like the unprecedented crisis posed by this
global pandemic—is far from over. Though its pace of growth has showed signs of
slowing, the virus remains aggressive and persistent: to date, there have been
53,510 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Michigan, and 5,129 deaths from the
disease. There remains no treatment for the virus; it remains easy to transmit,
passing from asymptomatic individuals and surviving on surfaces for days; and
we still lack adequate means to fully test for it and trace its spread.
COVID-19 remains present and pervasive in Michigan, and it stands ready to
quickly undo our recent progress in slowing its spread. Indeed, while COVID-19
initially hit southeast Michigan hardest, the disease is now spreading more
quickly in other parts of the state. For instance, cases in some counties in
western and mid-Michigan are now doubling approximately every 10 days.
Michigan’s Safer at Home orders have
aimed to reduce the spread of COVID-19 within the state. As summer approaches,
Michigan’s more rural counties are beginning to see more out-of-town visitors.
The residents of these rural counties are among the most vulnerable to
COVID-19, with older populations and rates of chronic illness among the highest
in the state. Twenty-one of Michigan’s eighty-three counties—all rural—have a
median age over 50, and nearly 30% of Michigan’s rural population is 65 or
older. These rural areas tend to be miles away from larger hospitals with the
personnel, beds, and equipment to fight this virus.
The economic and social harms from this
pandemic likewise persist. Michigan has experienced an uptick in individuals
reaching out to domestic violence hotlines and many shelters across Michigan are
already over capacity. Due to the pandemic and the responsive measures
necessary to address it, businesses and government agencies have had to quickly
and dramatically adjust how they work. Where working from home is not possible,
businesses have closed or significantly restricted their normal operations.
The economic damage—already severe—will
continue to compound with time. Between March 15 and May 13, Michigan had 1.8
million initial unemployment claims—the fifth-highest nationally, amounting to
nearly 36% of the Michigan workforce. During this crisis, Michigan has often
processed more unemployment claims in a single day than in the most painful
week of the Great Recession, and the state has already reached its highest
unemployment rate since the Great Depression (22.7% in April). Between March 15
and May 21, Michigan paid out over $7 billion in benefits to eligible
Michiganders. The Michigan Department of Treasury predicts that this year the
state will lose between $1 and $3 billion in revenue. As a result, local
governments will struggle to provide essential services to their communities
and many families in Michigan will struggle to pay their bills or even put food
on the table.
So too will the pandemic continue to
disrupt our homes and our educational, civic, social, and religious
institutions. Transitioning almost overnight to a distance-learning environment
has placed strain on educators, students, and parents alike. The closure of
museums and theaters limits people’s ability to enrich themselves through the
arts. And curtailing gatherings has left many seeking new ways to connect with
their community during these challenging times.
A second wave of COVID-19 cases
continues to pose a deadly threat to the people of this state. As various sectors of Michigan’s economy
begin to reopen, we must be able to respond nimbly to new data about
transmission and health risks of the virus. Over the past months, researchers
have discovered that COVID‑19 can attack not only the lungs, but also the
heart, brain, kidneys, liver, and blood. While older individuals are at higher
risk of contracting and dying from COVID-19, studies have shown that the
disease may increase the severity of strokes in younger people.
The health, economic, and social harms
of the COVID-19 pandemic thus remain widespread and severe, and they continue
to constitute a statewide emergency and disaster. While the virus has afflicted
some regions of the state more severely than others, the extent of the virus’s
spread, coupled with its elusiveness and its ease of transmission, render the
virus difficult to contain and threaten the entirety of this state. Michigan’s
fatality rate from COVID-19 remains the highest among neighboring states and
sits around three percentage points higher than the national average. The
underlying health factors that contribute to the severity of COVID-19 in
Michigan remain present, as does the disease.
Although local health departments have
some limited capacity to respond to cases as they arise within their
jurisdictions, state emergency operations are necessary to bring this pandemic
under control in Michigan and to build and maintain infrastructure to stop the
spread of COVID-19, trace infections, and quickly direct additional resources
to hot-spots as they emerge. State assistance to bolster health care capacity
and flexibility also has been, and will continue to be, critical to saving
lives, protecting public health and safety, and averting catastrophe. Moreover,
state disaster and emergency recovery efforts remain necessary not only to
support Michiganders in need due to the economic effects of this pandemic, but
also to ensure that the prospect of lost income does not impel workers who may
be infected to report to work.
Statewide coordination of these efforts
is crucial to creating a stable path to recovery. Until that recovery is
underway, the economic and fiscal harms from this pandemic have been contained,
and the threats posed by COVID-19 to life and the public health, safety, and
welfare of this state have been neutralized, statewide disaster and emergency
conditions will exist.
Acting under the Michigan Constitution
of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. The
COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a disaster and emergency throughout the State of
Michigan.
2. This
order constitutes a state of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers
of the Governor Act of 1945. Subject to the ongoing litigation, and the
possibility that current rulings may be overturned or otherwise altered on
appeal, and to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act of 1976 when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has not granted an extension
request, this order constitutes a state of emergency and state of disaster
declaration under that act.
3. This
order is effective immediately and continues through June 19, 2020 at 11:59
p.m. I will evaluate the continuing need for this order prior to its
expiration.
4. Executive
Orders 2020-67 and 2020-68 are rescinded. All previous orders that rested on
those orders now rest on this order.
Given under my hand and the Great Seal
of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 22, 2020
Time: 4:49 p.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 26, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-100
Amending certain previously issued
executive orders
to clarify their duration
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is a
respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is caused
by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and easily
spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department of
Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive cases
of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order 2020-4.
This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan under
section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency
Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended, MCL 30.401 et seq., and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945, 1945
PA 302, as amended, MCL 10.31 et seq.
Acting under the state of emergency
declared in Executive Order 2020-4, I issued several executive orders to make
reasonable and necessary adjustments to various laws and procedures to help
mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, to suppress the
spread of COVID-19, to prevent the state’s health care system from being
overwhelmed, to allow time for the production of critical test kits, ventilators,
and personal protective equipment, to establish the public health
infrastructure necessary to contain the spread of infection, and to avoid
needless deaths, I adopted Executive Orders 2020-9 on March 16, 2020, which
closed places of public accommodation, and Executive Order 2020-21 on March 23,
2020, which directed residents to remain at home or in their place of residence
to the maximum extent feasible.
Since then, the virus has spread across
Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens of
thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and educational,
civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in response to the
growing and severe health, economic, and social harms posed by the COVID-19 pandemic,
I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded on Executive Order 2020-4
and declared both a state of emergency and a state of disaster across the State
of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963,
the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of
1945.
Following the declarations of emergency
and disaster in Executive Order 2020-33, I issued and amended a number of
executive orders that also made reasonable and necessary adjustments to various
laws and procedures. In particular, in Executive Orders 2020-20 and 2020-43, I
extended the order closing places of public accommodation. And in Executive
Orders 2020-42 and 2020-59, I extended the order directing residents to stay
home and stay safe.
On April 30, 2020, although the
emergency and disaster caused by the COVID-19 pandemic was still ongoing, the
Legislature refused to extend the states of emergency and disaster. For that
reason, as required by statute, I issued Executive Order 2020-66, terminating
the states of emergency and disaster. The same day, because the COVID-19
pandemic still presented a threat to human life and the public health, safety,
and welfare of this state, I issued Executive Order 2020-67, which declared a
state of emergency under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, and
Executive Order 2020-68, which declared a state of emergency and a state of
disaster under the Emergency Management Act.
The measures put in place by my
executive orders have been effective: the number of new confirmed cases each
day is slowly dropping. Although the virus remains aggressive and persistent—on
May 21, 2020, Michigan reported 53,510 confirmed cases and 5,129 deaths—the
strain on our health care system has begun to relent, even as our testing
capacity has increased. With Executive Orders 2020-70, 2020-77, 2020-92, and
2020-96, we have begun the process of gradually resuming in-person work and
activities that were temporarily suspended under my prior orders. At the same
time, with Executive Order 2020-69, I retained and extended the order closing
places of public accommodation. We must move with care, patience, and
vigilance, recognizing the grave harm that this virus continues to inflict on
our state and how quickly our progress in suppressing it can be undone.
Executive Orders 2020-67 and 2020-68
have been challenged, however, in Michigan
House of Representatives and Michigan Senate v Whitmer. On May 21, 2020,
the Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order 2020-67 is a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act but that Executive
Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency
Management Act. Both of those rulings are likely to be appealed.
Today, I issued Executive Order
2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a disaster and
emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted a state of
emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945.
And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a state of
disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and disaster
conditions exist yet the legislature has not granted an extension request, that
order also constituted a state of emergency and state of disaster declaration
under that act.
With this order, I find it reasonable
and necessary to extend Executive Orders 2020-62, 2020-69, and 2020‑96
for three weeks from the date of this order. I also find it reasonable and
necessary to clarify and, as necessary, amend the duration of certain executive
orders that followed Executive Order 2020-04 and Executive Order 2020-33 given
that they have been superseded by later emergency and disaster declarations.
The Emergency Powers of the Governor
Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive order. In
relevant part, the EPGA provides that, after declaring a state of emergency,
“the governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and regulations as he or
she considers necessary to protect life and property or to bring the emergency
situation within the affected area under control.” MCL 10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the ongoing
litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned or
otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke the Emergency Management Act as a
basis for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the
effects of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to
preserve the rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the
governor with broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or
the people of this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the
governor may implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives
having the force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order
falls within the scope of those powers and duties, and to the extent the
governor may declare a state of emergency and a state of disaster under the
Emergency Management Act when emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the
legislature has not granted an extension request, they too provide a sufficient
legal basis for this order.
Acting under the Michigan Constitution
of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. The
following executive orders remain in effect and do not terminate until the end
of the states of emergency and disaster declared in Executive Order 2020-99 or
the end of any subsequently declared states of disaster or emergency arising
out of the COVID-19 pandemic, whichever comes later.
(a) Executive
Order 2020-26.
(b) Executive
Order 2020-28.
(c) Executive
Order 2020-36.
(d) Executive
Order 2020-39.
(e) Executive
Order 2020-58.
(f) Executive
Order 2020-61.
(g) Executive
Order 2020-64
(h) Executive
Order 2020-76.
2. The following
executive orders are amended as follows:
(a) Under
Executive Order 2020-46, the Michigan Liquor Control Commission may take
physical possession of any spirits held by any licensee to which the Commission
holds legal title at any time later than 90 days after the end of the states of
emergency and disaster declared in Executive Order 2020-99 or the end of any
subsequently declared states of disaster or emergency arising out of the
COVID-19 pandemic, whichever comes later.
(b) Under
Executive Order 2020-52, any three-year certificates that were set to expire on
December 31, 2019 and were deemed unexpired will not expire until 60 days after
the end of the states of emergency and disaster declared in Executive Order
2020-99 or the end of any subsequently declared states of disaster or emergency
arising out of the COVID-19 pandemic, whichever comes later.
(c) Under
Executive Order 2020-55, the Michigan Coronavirus Task Force on Racial
Disparities will continue its work until 90 days after the end of the states of
emergency and disaster declared in Executive Order 2020-99 or the end of any
subsequently declared states of disaster or emergency arising out of the
COVID-19 pandemic, whichever comes later, or such other time as the governor
identifies.
(d) Under
Executive Order 2020-58, all deadlines applicable to the commencement of all
civil and probate actions and proceedings, including but not limited to any
deadline for the filing of an initial pleading and any statutory notice
provision or other prerequisite related to the deadline for filing of such a
pleading, remain suspended and shall be tolled until the end of the states of
emergency and disaster declared in Executive Order 2020-99 or the end of any
subsequently declared states of disaster or emergency arising out of the
COVID-19 pandemic, whichever comes later.
3. Executive
Orders 2020-62, 2020-69, and 2020-96 will remain in effect until 11:59 p.m. on
June 12, 2020.
Given under my hand and the Great Seal
of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 22, 2020
Time: 4:52 p.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 26, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-101
Extending the expiration date for
watercraft registration
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is a
respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is caused
by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and easily
spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department of
Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive cases
of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order 2020-4.
This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan under
section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management
Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended (EMA), MCL 30.401 et seq., and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945,
1945 PA 302, as amended (EPGA), MCL 10.31 et
seq.
Since then, the virus spread across
Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens of
thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and educational,
civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in response to the
widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed by the COVID-19
pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded on Executive
Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of disaster
across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan
Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency Powers of
the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that COVID-19 had
created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of Michigan, I
issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency declaration under the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as Executive Order 2020-68 to
issue new emergency and disaster declarations under the Emergency Management
Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of Representatives
and Michigan Senate v Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the Court of Claims
ruled that Executive Order 2020-67 is a valid exercise of authority under the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act but that Executive Order 2020-68 is not a
valid exercise of authority under the Emergency Management Act. Both of those
rulings are likely to be appealed.
On May 22, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a disaster
and emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted a state
of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of
1945. And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has declined to grant an
extension request, that order also constituted a state of emergency and state
of disaster declaration under that act.
The Emergency Powers of the Governor
Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive order. In
relevant part, it provides that, after declaring a state of emergency, “the
governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and regulations as he or she
considers necessary to protect life and property or to bring the emergency
situation within the affected area under control.” MCL 10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the ongoing
litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned or
otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke Emergency Management Act as a basis
for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the effects
of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to preserve the
rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the governor with broad
powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or the people of this
state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the governor may implement
through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives having the force and
effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order falls within the scope
of those powers and duties, and to the extent the governor may declare a state
of emergency and a state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when
emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has not granted an
extension request, they too provide a sufficient legal basis for this order.
Every spring and summer, Michiganders
renew their watercraft registrations so they can take to the water and enjoy
the natural beauty of this state. Strict compliance with the watercraft
registration requirements of state law would inevitably result in crowds
flocking to the branch offices of the Secretary of State, increasing in-person
interactions and putting people at risk. In order to reduce in-person work and
minimize the risk of transmission, I find it reasonable and necessary to extend
the validity of expiring registrations and suspend penalties for operating
watercraft with expired decals.
Acting under the Michigan Constitution
of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. Individuals
must, to the best of their ability, complete watercraft registration renewals
online at www.michigan.gov/sos/ during any state of emergency or
state of disaster arising out of the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Strict
compliance with section 80124(16) of the Natural Resources and Environmental
Protection Act, MCL 324.80124(16) is temporarily suspended to the extent
necessary to extend until July 31, 2020 the validity of any watercraft decal
that expired or is set to expire between February 1, 2020 and June 30, 2020.
3. Until
July 31, 2020, operating a watercraft with a decal that expired after September
30, 2019 does not constitute a violation of the Natural Resources and
Environmental Protection Act. Law enforcement officials must not issue any
ticket for the sole reason that a watercraft decal expired after September 30,
2019. The Department of State must not assess a late fee for the renewal of a
watercraft registration decal that expired after September 30, 2019, provided
renewal occurs by July 31, 2020.
4. Strict
compliance with section 80122(1) of the Natural Resources and Environmental
Protection Act, MCL 324.80122(1), is temporarily suspended to allow a vessel to
operate on the waters of this state on or before July 31, 2020 without
displaying an identifying number and decal, provided the operator of the vessel
possesses a proof of purchase or equivalent evidence that the vessel was
acquired after January 1, 2020.
5. Until
July 31, 2020, operating a watercraft that was purchased after January 1, 2020
without a decal does not constitute a violation of the Natural Resources and
Environmental Protection Act. Law enforcement officials must not issue any
ticket for the sole reason that a watercraft is operated without a decal,
provided the operator possesses a proof of purchase or equivalent evidence that
the vessel was acquired after January 1, 2020.
6. This
order is effective immediately.
Given under my hand and the Great Seal
of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 22, 2020
Time: 5:54 p.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 26, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-102
Temporary Relief from Standard Vapor
Pressure Restrictions on Gasoline Sales
Rescission of Executive Order 2020-31
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is a
respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is caused
by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and easily
spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department of
Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive cases
of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order 2020-4.
This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan under
section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency
Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended (EMA), MCL 30.401 et seq., and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945,
1945 PA 302, as amended (EPGA), MCL 10.31 et
seq.
Since then, the virus spread across
Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens of
thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and educational,
civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in response to the
widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed by the COVID-19
pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded on Executive
Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of disaster
across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan
Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency Powers of
the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that COVID-19 had
created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of Michigan, I
issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency declaration under the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as Executive Order 2020-68 to
issue new emergency and disaster declarations under the Emergency Management
Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of
Representatives and Michigan Senate v Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the
Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order 2020-67 is a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act but that Executive
Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency
Management Act. Both of those rulings are likely to be appealed.
On May 22, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a disaster
and emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted a state
of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of
1945. And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has declined to grant an
extension request, that order also constituted a state of emergency and state of
disaster declaration under that act.
The Emergency Powers of the Governor
Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive order. In
relevant part, it provides that, after declaring a state of emergency, “the
governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and regulations as he or she
considers necessary to protect life and property or to bring the emergency
situation within the affected area under control.” MCL 10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the ongoing
litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned or
otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke Emergency Management Act as a basis
for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the effects
of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to preserve the
rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the governor with
broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or the people of
this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the governor may implement
through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives having the force and
effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order falls within the scope
of those powers and duties, and to the extent the governor may declare a state
of emergency and a state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when
emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has not granted an
extension request, they too provide a sufficient legal basis for this order.
Due to the steep fall-off in gasoline
demand as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, gasoline storage capacity is
limited and more time is needed to transition the distribution system in order
to come into compliance for the summer driving season. Without a waiver of the
summer gasoline requirements, parties upstream of retailers and wholesale
purchasers would have been required to stop selling the winter gasoline sitting
in their storage tanks on May 1, 2020, which would have prevented them from
loading summer gasoline into the storage tanks, resulting in a shortage of
gasoline. A gasoline shortage could result in higher prices at the pump, making
it harder for families already struggling with the economic impacts of COVID‑19
to put food on the table. It could also cause longer lines at service stations
across Michigan, increasing in‑person interactions and putting people at
risk. In order to reduce economic hardship, reduce in-person work, and minimize
the risk of transmission, I find it reasonable and necessary to temporarily
waive the summer low volatility requirements and blending limitations for
gasoline.
With this order, Executive Order
2020-31 is rescinded.
Acting under the Michigan Constitution
of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. Rule
4(g) of Regulation No. 564, promulgated by the Laboratory Division of the
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, 1987 AACS, as amended, R
285.564.4(g) of the Michigan Administrative Code, regarding vapor pressure, is
temporarily suspended through May 31, 2020.
2. Gasoline
received at retail on or before May 31, 2020 that does not meet the June 1
vapor pressure standard, as outlined in the Motor Fuels Quality Act of 1984, as
amended, the Motor Fuels Quality Act section 10d (MCL 290.650d), Regulation No.
561 Dispensing Facility Vapor Pressure R 285.561.2 (Rule 2) and R 285.561.3
(Rule 3), or Regulation No. 564 Automotive Motor Fuel Purity, Additives, and
Grading R 285.564.4 (Rule 4 Table 5) may be sold through June 30, 2020.
3. Any
gasoline received at retail on or after June 1, 2020 shall at time of delivery
meet the vapor pressure requirements outlined in the Motor Fuels Quality Act of
1984, as amended, the Motor Fuels Quality Act section 10d (MCL 290.650d),
Regulation No. 561 Dispensing Facility Vapor Pressure R 285.561.2 (Rule 2) and
R 285.561.3 (Rule 3), or Regulation No. 564 Automotive Motor Fuel Purity,
Additives, and Grading, R 285.564.4 (Rule 4 Table 5).
4. Consistent
with the Environmental Protection Agency’s March 27, 2020 waiver, gasoline that
does not meet the low volatility requirements, as specified above, may no
longer be introduced into terminal storage tanks. Any gasoline not meeting the
requirements may continue to be distributed from terminal storage tanks to
retailers through May 31, 2020.
5. The
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development shall coordinate state
compliance with this order.
6. Executive
Order 2020-31 is rescinded.
7. This
order is effective immediately.
Given under my hand and the Great Seal
of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 22, 2020
Time: 4:56 p.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 26, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-103
Providing alternative notice of public
hearings under
Michigan’s tax abatement statutes
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is a
respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is caused
by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and easily
spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department of
Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive cases
of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order 2020-4.
This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan under
section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency
Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended (EMA), MCL 30.401 et seq., and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945,
1945 PA 302, as amended (EPGA), MCL 10.31 et
seq.
Since then, the virus spread across
Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens of
thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and educational,
civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in response to the
widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed by the COVID-19
pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded on Executive
Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of disaster
across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan
Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency Powers of
the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that COVID-19 had
created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of Michigan, I
issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency declaration under the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as Executive Order 2020-68 to
issue new emergency and disaster declarations under the Emergency Management
Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of
Representatives and Michigan Senate v Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the
Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order 2020-67 is a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act but that Executive
Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency
Management Act. Both of those rulings are likely to be appealed.
On May 22, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a disaster
and emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted a state
of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of
1945. And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has declined to grant an
extension request, that order also constituted a state of emergency and state
of disaster declaration under that act.
The Emergency Powers of the Governor
Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive order. In
relevant part, it provides that, after declaring a state of emergency, “the
governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and regulations as he or she
considers necessary to protect life and property or to bring the emergency
situation within the affected area under control.” MCL 10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the ongoing
litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned or
otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke Emergency Management Act as a basis
for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the effects
of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to preserve the
rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the governor with
broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or the people of
this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the governor may
implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives having the
force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order falls within
the scope of those powers and duties, and to the extent the governor may
declare a state of emergency and a state of disaster under the Emergency
Management Act when emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the legislature
has not granted an extension request, they too provide a sufficient legal basis
for this order.
It has long been the public policy of
this state that, in certain circumstances, tax-based incentives can be properly
used to bring about change that is beneficial to the public as a whole. To this
end, the Legislature has enacted several statutes that operate as tax
abatements. In these statutes, the Legislature has authorized certain local
governmental units to create tax abatement districts within which certain
properties can receive some form of property tax exemption. But before a tax
abatement district can be created and before property can be approved for a tax
exemption, the responsible local governmental unit is required to conduct a
public hearing and provide notice of the hearing to multiple parties including
individuals, public officials, and other municipalities. This provision of such
notice ensures that all persons affected by the local governmental unit’s
decision-making have an opportunity to be heard in that decision-making
process.
Strict compliance with the notice
requirements of certain tax abatement statutes would require dozens of staff to
work in-person to complete the hundreds of mailings required, increasing in-person
interactions and putting people at risk. In order to reduce in-person work and
minimize the risk of transmission, I find it reasonable and necessary to
provide temporary alternative means for satisfying those statutory notice
requirements.
Acting under the Michigan Constitution
of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. Consistent
with Executive Order 2020-75, or any order that follows it, any public hearing
that is required to take place under a tax abatement statute may be held
electronically, including by telephonic conferencing or video conferencing, in
a manner that allows all persons and entities entitled to notice under the
applicable tax abatement statute to participate by electronic means.
2. Strict
compliance with any requirement under a tax abatement statute to provide notice
of a public hearing is temporarily suspended to allow for the responsible local
governmental units to provide notice of public hearings in the following
manner:
(a) To
ensure that notice is provided to any real property owners within a proposed
tax abatement district that are entitled to notice, the local governmental unit
must publish in three successive issues of a generally circulated newspaper
serving the proposed tax abatement district where available, or if no such
newspaper is available, by the posting of the notice in five conspicuous places
in the proposed tax abatement district.
(b) To
ensure that notice is provided to any required taxing jurisdiction, assessor,
or other public official that is entitled to receive notice under the
particular tax abatement statute, the local governmental unit may provide
notice via email to the appropriate governmental or business email address.
(c) To
ensure that notice is provided to the general public, the local governmental
unit must:
(i) Post
notice of the public hearing in a prominent and conspicuous place at both the
public body’s principal office; and
(ii) Post
notice of the public hearing on a portion of the local governmental unit’s
website that is fully accessible to the public, if the local governmental unit
directly or indirectly maintains an official internet presence. The public
notice on the website must be included on either the homepage or on a separate
webpage dedicated to public notices for non-regularly scheduled public meetings
or electronic meetings and accessible through a prominent and conspicuous link
on the website’s homepage that clearly describes its purpose for public
notification of those non-regularly scheduled or electronic public meetings.
3. Section
2 of this order does not prevent a local governmental unit from providing
notice in the manner prescribed by the relevant tax abatement statute if the
local governmental unit is able to do so safely and consistently with workplace
standards enacted in accordance with Executive Order 2020-97, or any order that
follows it.
4. Without
regard to whether the local governmental unit provided notice in the manner
required by the relevant tax abatement statute or in the manner set forth in
section 2 of this order, notice of a public hearing required by a tax abatement
statute that will be conducted electronically in accordance with Executive
Order 2020-75, or any order that follows it, must include each of the
following:
(a) An
explanation of the reason why the public body is meeting electronically.
(b) Detailed
procedures by which the public may participate in the meeting remotely,
including a telephone number, internet address, or both.
(c) Procedures
by which persons may contact members of the public body to provide input or ask
questions on any business that will come before the public body at the meeting.
(d) Procedures
by which persons with disabilities may participate in the meeting.
5. This
order does not change or otherwise affect the time requirements for notice of
public hearings in any tax abatement statute.
6. A
person is considered to have been provided the notice and opportunity to be
heard required by a tax abatement statute if the local governmental unit
followed the procedures set forth above in sections 2 and 3 of this order.
Failure to strictly comply with the procedures set forth in sections 2 and 3 of
this order does not by itself constitute grounds to invalidate an action taken
by a local governmental unit under a tax abatement statute.
7. To
the extent that this order creates a conflict with any requirement set by a
local governmental unit’s charter or ordinances, the contents of this order
control.
8. As
used in this order:
(a) The
term “local governmental unit” means a political subdivision of this state that
is authorized to create an abatement district, reduce the level of taxation on
a certain property, or exempt certain property from taxation, under a tax
abatement statute. Additionally, for the purposes of the Plant Rehabilitation
and Industrial Development Districts Act, it also includes a Next Michigan
development corporation as that term is defined in section 3 of the Next
Michigan Development Act, MCL 125.2953.
(b) The
term “tax abatement district” means any district that can be created by a local
governmental unit in a tax abatement statute within which certain property may
be eligible for a property tax exemption.
(c) The
term “tax abatement statute” means one of the following statutes that allows
for a reduction in, or an exemption of, the level of taxation ordinarily
imposed on property in this state: the Obsolete Property Rehabilitation Act,
MCL 125.2781 et seq., the
Neighborhood Enterprise Zone Act, MCL 207.771 et seq., the Commercial Rehabilitation Act, MCL 207.841 et seq., the Commercial Redevelopment
Act, MCL 207.651 et seq., and the
Plant Rehabilitation and Industrial Development Districts Act, MCL 207.551 et seq.
9. This
order is effective immediately and continues through June 30, 2020.
Given under my hand and the Great Seal
of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 22, 2020
Time: 5:00 p.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 26, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-104
Increasing COVID-19 testing by
expanding the scope of practice for certain
professionals and encouraging the establishment of community testing locations
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is a
respiratory disease that can result in serious illness or death. It is caused
by a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans and easily
spread from person to person. There is currently no approved vaccine or
antiviral treatment for this disease.
On March 10, 2020, the Department of
Health and Human Services identified the first two presumptive-positive cases
of COVID-19 in Michigan. On that same day, I issued Executive Order 2020-4.
This order declared a state of emergency across the state of Michigan under
section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, the Emergency
Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended (EMA), MCL 30.401 et seq., and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945,
1945 PA 302, as amended (EPGA), MCL 10.31 et
seq.
Since then, the virus spread across
Michigan, bringing deaths in the thousands, confirmed cases in the tens of
thousands, and deep disruption to this state’s economy, homes, and educational,
civic, social, and religious institutions. On April 1, 2020, in response to the
widespread and severe health, economic, and social harms posed by the COVID-19
pandemic, I issued Executive Order 2020-33. This order expanded on Executive
Order 2020-4 and declared both a state of emergency and a state of disaster
across the State of Michigan under section 1 of article 5 of the Michigan
Constitution of 1963, the Emergency Management Act, and the Emergency Powers of
the Governor Act of 1945. And on April 30, 2020, finding that COVID-19 had
created emergency and disaster conditions across the State of Michigan, I
issued Executive Order 2020-67 to continue the emergency declaration under the
Emergency Powers of the Governor Act, as well as Executive Order 2020-68 to
issue new emergency and disaster declarations under the Emergency Management
Act.
Those executive orders have been
challenged in Michigan House of
Representatives and Michigan Senate v Whitmer. On May 21, 2020, the
Court of Claims ruled that Executive Order 2020-67 is a valid exercise of
authority under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act but that Executive
Order 2020-68 is not a valid exercise of authority under the Emergency
Management Act. Both of those rulings are likely to be appealed.
On May 22, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-99, again finding that the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a disaster
and emergency throughout the State of Michigan. That order constituted a state
of emergency declaration under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of
1945. And, to the extent the governor may declare a state of emergency and a
state of disaster under the Emergency Management Act when emergency and
disaster conditions exist yet the legislature has declined to grant an extension
request, that order also constituted a state of emergency and state of disaster
declaration under that act.
The Emergency Powers of the Governor
Act provides a sufficient legal basis for issuing this executive order. In
relevant part, it provides that, after declaring a state of emergency, “the
governor may promulgate reasonable orders, rules, and regulations as he or she
considers necessary to protect life and property or to bring the emergency
situation within the affected area under control.” MCL 10.31(1).
Nevertheless, subject to the ongoing
litigation and the possibility that current rulings may be overturned or
otherwise altered on appeal, I also invoke Emergency Management Act as a basis
for executive action to combat the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the effects
of this emergency on the people of Michigan, with the intent to preserve the
rights and protections provided by the EMA. The EMA vests the governor with
broad powers and duties to “cop[e] with dangers to this state or the people of
this state presented by a disaster or emergency,” which the governor may
implement through “executive orders, proclamations, and directives having the
force and effect of law.” MCL 30.403(1)–(2). This executive order falls within
the scope of those powers and duties, and to the extent the governor may
declare a state of emergency and a state of disaster under the Emergency
Management Act when emergency and disaster conditions exist yet the legislature
has not granted an extension request, they too provide a sufficient legal basis
for this order.
To help prevent the further spread of
COVID-19 and provide protections against the dangers to this state posed by the
COVID-19 emergency, it is reasonable and necessary to enable a broader range of
qualified medical professionals to order COVID-19 tests and to encourage the
establishment of community testing locations by reducing barriers to siting and
staffing such test sites.
Acting under the Michigan Constitution
of 1963 and Michigan law, I order the following:
1. It is
the public policy of the State of Michigan that testing for COVID-19 should be
available to any individual with reason to be tested for COVID-19 without any
out-of-pocket cost to such individual.
(a) For
purposes of this order, “person with reason to be tested for COVID-19” includes
anyone who meets at least one of the COVID-19 testing prioritization criteria
specified by the Chief Medical Executive.
(b) A
person with reason to be tested for COVID-19 may receive a test at a community
testing location without securing an order from a medical provider in advance.
Medical providers will be available to order testing upon arrival. A person who
wishes to be tested may call the coronavirus hotline at 1-888-535-6136 or visit
www.michigan.gov/coronavirustest to find an appropriate testing location.
(c) DHHS
may issue orders and directives to implement this section.
2. Qualifications.
(a) Nothing
in this order is intended to alter any obligation of a health insurance
company, pursuant to the terms of an insurance policy, to cover costs related
to COVID-19 testing for any policyholder.
(b) Nothing
in this order is intended to supersede the medical judgment of any health care
provider.
3. A
licensee holding one of the following license types may establish and administer
a COVID-19 testing service without an additional state license or permit at any
site, with permission from the person with the right to occupy and exclude
others from the property:
(a) Physician’s
assistant, licensed under Part 170 of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368, as
amended (“Public Health Code”), MCL 333.17001 et seq.;
(b) Advanced
practice registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, or registered professional
nurse, licensed under Part 172 of the Public Health Code, MCL 17201 et seq.;
(c) Pharmacist,
licensed under Part 177 of the Public Health Code, MCL 333.17701 et seq.
4. The
licensees identified in section 2 must be considered to be persons authorized
to order a laboratory test that has been classified by the Food and Drug Administration
as moderate or high complexity, consistent with section 20521 of the Public
Health Code, 1978 PA 368, as amended. MCL 333.20521.
5. Strict
compliance with the scope-of-practice, supervision, and delegation provisions
of the parts of the public health code identified in paragraph 1 of this order
are temporarily suspended to the extent necessary to allow licensees governed
by these parts to comply with section 6 of this order, provided the licensee is
properly trained to perform those tasks and functions.
6. Licensees
administering a COVID-19 testing service or testing laboratory shall comply
with the following:
(a) Any
specimen collected at a COVID-19 testing service shall be tested at a
laboratory or entity in accordance with federal CLIA regulations as facilitated
by the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs. High-complexity tests,
including PCR tests, must be tested at a laboratory that is CLIA certified.
Waived tests, including rapid point-of-care diagnostic tests, must be tested at
an entity that has obtained a CLIA waiver.
(b) The
licensee shall provide personnel with any training necessary to operate a
COVID-19 testing service.
(c) The
licensee shall comply with any reporting requirements issued by DHHS.
(d) COVID-19
testing service personnel shall use proper personal protective equipment when
administering and conducting specimen collection and testing.
(e) A
licensee collecting specimens for testing who does not perform testing shall
securely store specimens pending retrieval by the entity that will test the
specimens.
(f) A
licensee shall refer patients to appropriate medical providers for follow up,
if not available through the entity conducting testing.
7. Unlicensed
individuals may perform any of the tasks and functions of COVID-19 testing
services, including screening of patients, observing self-swabbing, temporarily
storing specimens pending transmittal to a laboratory, transmitting specimens
to a laboratory, reporting test results to the Michigan Disease Surveillance
System, and referring patients to appropriate medical providers for follow-up,
provided:
(a) The
unlicensed individuals have been trained to perform the tasks and functions
they are performing; and
(b) The
unlicensed individuals are supervised by a licensed medical provider referenced
in section 2 of this order or by county or municipal health personnel who have
been properly trained to supervise the performance of the tasks and functions
the unlicensed individuals are performing.
8. Insofar
as section 11 of the Emergency Management Act, MCL 30.411, remains in effect,
anyone establishing, volunteering, or working at a community testing location
constitutes personnel of a disaster relief force, and, with respect to the
activities of COVID-19 testing, are entitled to the same rights and immunities
as provided by law for the employees of this state under MCL 30.411(1)(c).
9. Definitions.
(a) For
purpose of this order, “COVID-19 testing service” means any operation that
administers the collection of samples to be tested by a CLIA certified or CLIA
waived entity for COVID-19 to individuals in this state.
(b) For
purposes of this order, “community testing location” means a COVID-19 testing
service that (a) offers testing for any individual with reason to be
tested for COVID-19; (b) does not require any out-of-pocket payment for a
COVID-19 test for any individual with reason to be tested for COVID-19; (c)
does not require a person with reason to be tested for COVID-19 to obtain a
prescription for testing in advance of booking an appointment; and (d) has
medical providers available and able to order a COVID-19 test onsite.
10. This
order is effective immediately upon issuance.
Given under my hand and the Great Seal
of the State of Michigan.
Date: May 26, 2020
Time: 2:45 p.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following message from the Governor
was received on May 27, 2020, and read:
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
No.
2020-105
Declaration of State of Emergency
On May 19, 2020, I issued Executive
Order 2020-94 declaring a state of emergency for the city of Midland and the
county of Midland due to severe flooding as a result of the failure of the
Edenville and Sanford Dam structures along the Tittabawassee River. On May 22,
2020, I amended and expanded the state declaration of emergency, issuing
Executive Order 2020-98 to include impacted areas of Arenac, Gladwin, and
Saginaw counties. This event has also caused severe flooding in Iosco County.
In response, the county of Iosco, has
taken several actions that include declaring a local state of emergency;
activating disaster response and recovery operations; evacuating and providing
shelter to affected residents; and issuing emergency public information. The
assistance of voluntary organizations and the state are required to protect
public health, safety, and property, and to lessen or avert more severe and
lasting harm to the community.
Despite these measures, local resources
are insufficient to respond to the extreme flooding under the current
conditions. State assistance and other outside resources are necessary to
effectively respond to, and recover from, the impacts of flooding.
Under the Emergency Management Act,
1976 PA 390, MCL 30.403(4), “[t]he governor shall, by executive order or
proclamation, declare a state of emergency if he or she finds that an emergency
has occurred or that the threat of an emergency exists.” Therefore, acting
under the Michigan Constitution of 1963 and Michigan law, including the
Emergency Management Act, 1976 PA 390, MCL 30.401 to 30.421, I find it
reasonable and necessary to amend and expand Executive Order 2020-94, and order
the following:
1. In
addition to the city of Midland and the counties of Midland, Arenac, Gladwin,
and Saginaw, a state of emergency is also declared for the county of Iosco.
2. Any
emergency order issued in response to the COVID-19 crisis is temporarily
suspended in these counties to the extent such order impedes the emergency
response effort under this declaration.
3. The
Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division of the Department of State
Police shall coordinate and augment all state efforts and may call upon all
state departments to utilize available resources to assist in the designated
area pursuant to the Michigan Emergency Management Plan.
The state of emergency is terminated at
such time as the threats to public health, safety, and property caused by the
emergency no longer exist, and appropriate programs have been implemented to
recover from the effects of this emergency, but in no case later than June 16,
2020, unless extended as provided by 1976 Public Act 390, as amended.
Date: May 26, 2020
Time: 8:42 p.m.
Gretchen
Whitmer
[SEAL] Governor
By
the Governor:
Jocelyn
Benson
Secretary
of State
The executive order was referred to the
Committee on Government Operations.
The following messages from the
Governor were received and read:
May 22, 2020
I respectfully submit to the
Senate the following appointments to office pursuant to Public Act 232 of 1965,
MCL 290.657:
Michigan
Dairy Market Program Committee
Mr. Jeremy Beebe of 6199 Miller
Road, Whittemore, Michigan 48770, county of Iosco, succeeding Rodney Daniels
who has resigned, appointed to represent the Michigan Milk Producers
Association, for a term commencing May 22, 2020 and expiring December 31, 2020.
Mr. Eric J. Frahm of 1520 Frahm
Road, Frankenmuth, Michigan 48734, county of Saginaw, reappointed to represent
the Michigan Milk Producers Association, for a term commencing May 22, 2020 and
expiring December 31, 2022.
Mr. Jeffrey E. Horning of 11834
E. Pleasant Lake Road, Manchester, Michigan 48158, county of Washtenaw,
reappointed to represent the Michigan Milk Producers Association, for a term
commencing May 22, 2020 and expiring December 31, 2022.
Mr. Corby L. Werth of 8303 Napper
Road, Alpena, Michigan 49707, county of Alpena, reappointed to represent the
Michigan Milk Producers Association, for a term commencing May 22, 2020 and
expiring December 31, 2022.
May 22, 2020
I respectfully submit to the
Senate the following appointment to office pursuant to Executive Order No. 2002-06,
MCL 256.571:
Governor’s
Traffic Safety Advisory Commission
Chief Ronald L. Wiles, Jr. of
5520 Chatham Lane, Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439, county of Genesee, reappointed
to represent local units of government, for a term commencing May 28, 2020 and
expiring May 27, 2023.
May 22, 2020
I respectfully submit to the
Senate the following appointments to office pursuant to Public Act 316 of 1986,
MCL 390.1430:
Michigan
Education Trust Board of Directors
Dr. Philomena V. Mantella of 1001
Monroe Avenue, N.W., Apt. 301, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, county of Kent, succeeding
Glenn Mroz whose term has expired, appointed to represent a president of a
state institution of higher education, for a term commencing May 22, 2020 and
expiring December 31, 2021.
Dr. Dale K. Nesbary of 800 First
Street, P.O. Box 1292, Muskegon, Michigan 49443, county of Muskegon, succeeding
Robert Ferrentino whose term has expired, appointed to represent a president of
a community or junior college, for a term commencing May 22, 2020 and expiring
December 31, 2021.
Mrs. Marlin Williams of 100 Riverfront
Drive, #109, Detroit, Michigan 48226, county of Wayne, succeeding Kristin
Beltzer whose term has expired, appointed to represent members with knowledge,
skill, and experience in the academic, business, or financial field, for a term
commencing May 22, 2020 and expiring December 31, 2022.
Respectfully,
Gretchen
Whitmer
Governor
The appointments were referred to
the Committee on Advice and Consent.
Recess
Senator
MacGregor moved that the Senate recess subject to the call of the Chair.
The motion
prevailed, the time being 10:08 a.m.
The
Senate was called to order by the President, Lieutenant Governor Gilchrist.
During
the recess, Senator Santana entered the Senate Chamber.
By
unanimous consent the Senate proceeded to the order of
General Orders
The
motion prevailed, and the President, Lieutenant Governor Gilchrist, designated
Senator Moss as Chairperson.
After
some time spent therein, the Committee arose; and the President, Lieutenant
Governor Gilchrist, having resumed the Chair, the Committee reported back to
the Senate, favorably and without amendment, the following bills:
Senate Bill No. 926, entitled
A bill
to make, supplement, adjust, and consolidate appropriations for various state
departments and agencies, the judicial branch, and the legislative branch for
the fiscal year ending September 30, 2021; to provide for certain conditions on
appropriations; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.
Senate Bill No. 927, entitled
A bill
to amend 1979 PA 94, entitled “The state school aid act of 1979,” by amending
sections 11, 17b, 201, and 236 (MCL 388.1611, 388.1617b, 388.1801, and
388.1836), sections 11 and 236 as amended by 2019 PA 162, section 17b as
amended by 2007 PA 137, and section 201 as amended by 2019 PA 52.
The
bills were placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.
Senate Bill No. 756, entitled
A bill
to amend 1954 PA 116, entitled “Michigan election law,” by amending section
765a (MCL 168.765a), as added by 2018 PA 123.
Substitute
(S-1)
Senate Bill No. 757, entitled
A bill
to amend 1954 PA 116, entitled “Michigan election law,” by amending sections
765, 765a, and 765b (MCL 168.765, 168.765a, and 168.765b), section 765 as
amended by 2018 PA 603, section 765a as added by 2018 PA 123, and section 765b
as added by 2018 PA 127, and by adding sections 14b and 24k.
Substitute
(S-4)
Senate Bill No. 926
Senate Bill No. 927
The motion prevailed, a majority of the
members serving voting therefor.
By
unanimous consent the Senate returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
Senator
MacGregor moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following bill:
Senate Bill No. 926
The
motion prevailed.
The
following bill was read a third time:
Senate Bill No. 926, entitled
A bill to make, supplement, adjust, and
consolidate appropriations for various state departments and agencies, the
judicial branch, and the legislative branch for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2021; to provide for certain conditions on appropriations; and to
provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.
The
question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor,
as follows:
Roll Call No.
150 Yeas—21
Barrett LaSata Nesbitt Stamas
Bizon Lauwers Outman Theis
Bumstead Lucido Runestad VanderWall
Daley MacGregor Schmidt Victory
Horn McBroom Shirkey Zorn
Johnson
Nays—15
Alexander Bullock Hollier Moss
Ananich Chang Irwin Santana
Bayer Geiss McCann Wojno
Brinks Hertel McMorrow
Excused—2
MacDonald Polehanki
Not
Voting—0
In The
Chair: President
The
Senate agreed to the title of the bill.
The
following bill was read a third time:
Senate Bill No. 927, entitled
A bill to amend 1979 PA 94, entitled “The
state school aid act of 1979,” by amending sections 11, 17b, 201, and 236 (MCL
388.1611, 388.1617b, 388.1801, and 388.1836), sections 11 and 236 as amended by
2019 PA 162, section 17b as amended by 2007 PA 137, and section 201 as amended
by 2019 PA 52.
The
question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor,
as follows:
Roll Call No.
151 Yeas—21
Barrett LaSata Nesbitt Stamas
Bizon Lauwers Outman Theis
Bumstead Lucido Runestad VanderWall
Daley MacGregor Schmidt Victory
Horn McBroom Shirkey Zorn
Johnson
Nays—15
Alexander Bullock Hollier Moss
Ananich Chang Irwin Santana
Bayer Geiss McCann Wojno
Brinks Hertel McMorrow
Excused—2
MacDonald Polehanki
Not
Voting—0
In The
Chair: President
The
Senate agreed to the title of the bill.
Senator
MacGregor moved that Senate Bill No. 926 be given immediate effect.
The motion did not prevail, 2/3 of the members
serving not voting therefor.
By
unanimous consent the Senate proceeded to the order of
Statements
The
motion prevailed.
Senator Stamas’ statement is as
follows:
Today I rise to reflect on what
has happened and what is going on in my communities. I now have three counties
under state emergency and I thank the Governor for her prompt response on those
requests.
I’d like to make sure to thank my
first responders, my road commissions, the volunteers, and the residents
throughout the community who stepped forward to help one another. A special
thank you to my emergency managers—Jennifer, Bob, and Ed—for the coordination
of so much work that is underway. Only through God’s grace have we not lost a
single life throughout this event which is an amazing testament to the spirit
of our communities and the dedication of those who face danger themselves as
two dams gave way, as the floodwaters proceeded through.
There are so many individuals who
have come forward to help—Dow Chemical, AT&T, Consumers, Nestle Water,
Meijer, the list goes on, for me to, I’ll miss, so I should probably not have
even started—all of those across the state and nation who have taken time to
send support, who are there on the ground today bailing mud out of basements,
tearing out drywall, tearing out wet insulation, and just giving a bottle of
water to those individuals who need that water throughout this heat.
I cannot say enough about United
Way either. The coordination of all
of these efforts has gone through United Way. 2-1-1 has been tremendous in
coordinating the response. If there are those who wish to donate, all
coordination should be though www.unitedwaymidland.org so we can continue to make sure
we get to those individuals who are in need. We now have all of our emergency
shelters closed so I will ask the Governor to please, please open our
restaurants so that the families who are displaced in these four counties have
a place to go. The restaurants have been amazing with the food and support. The
amount of devastation is mind-boggling. I was in Lanny’s Restaurant in downtown
Sanford and it looked like it was a whirlpool inside it—it was coming in one
door, going out the other, literally lifted up the chairs and tables and
swirled it around to totally devastate and destroy. The Red Oak Lounge, again,
total devastation, and the next day they were there. They were there looking at
it. With COVID-19, these restaurants were already struggling. The restaurant
owner at Lanny’s was desperately looking for his cash register before it became
missing. It’s hard to describe what has been put before these counties and these
residents.
I’ve been in the basements of
homes tearing out the walls, and tearing out and carrying out family
possessions. Ted’s home and lawn had eight feet of water in it. It’s amazing to
see that where water decides to go, it’s going to go. The number of bridges,
the number of roads that have been washed out in these four counties, is
incredible. I do also want to thank the Department of Transportation. They have
been extremely responsive. The Department of Health and Human Services has been
responsive. MDOT is already in works to re-open US-10 and some of the main
highways as well, and I appreciate all that they do.
But, I also want to thank each of
these members who are here today who reached out and offered your support. It
meant so much to me that you took time to recognize and offer that, and I truly
appreciate it. It wasn’t a Republican, it wasn’t a Democrat, it was the family
members on this floor who continue to offer your support, and I say thank you.
In closing, there is still so
much more to go. I will be calling on you to ask for your help as we go
forward. There are investigations that need to happen, but right now the first
priority is of the residents and the communities to make sure that we provide
all of those things that they need at this time. Again, thank you and I look
forward to working with you as we move forward with this issue.
Senator McMorrow’s statement is as
follows:
First off I want to say, my heart
goes out to my colleague and everybody who is affected by the devastating flooding.
My chief of staff is from Midland and spent all weekend cleaning out her
parent’s and grandparent’s places, drying out photos and records, and it’s just
unimaginable that that happened on top of what we’ve been facing as a state,
which brings me to what I want to talk about.
We have taken some big steps over
the past few weeks in Michigan with the first crisis that we were facing and
it’s almost hard to believe that just a couple of months ago the situation here
looked incredibly dire. Michigan’s trajectory on COVID cases and fatalities put
us on track to become the next New York. The stories from hospital workers at
Beaumont that flooded my inbox and my email and social media feed were
terrifying and heartbreaking, and the stories from constituents who lost loved
ones without ever saying goodbye were even worse.
But Michiganders are tough. We
see a threat and we spring into action, and thanks to the actions of 10 million
people all over our state, we have dramatically changed our future. COVID-19 is
still out there, but we have flattened the curve more aggressively than most
other states in the entire country, giving our hospitals time to manage this
attack and Michiganders have no doubt saved countless lives. And we’ve learned
so much along the say. So this weekend I launched a social media challenge on
Twitter, #MaskUpMichigan, and shared a picture of one of my masks made by Great
Lakes Sewing, a small business on Etsy out of Rochester, and challenged others
to show off their masks, because this was a big weekend. Finally it was safe
for us to gather in small groups to start to return to our communities and to
each other.
History has shown with pandemics
and viruses like this that it can come back a second time, more brutal than the
first time. But imagine if you learned that the simple act of you wearing
socks, for example, could save someone else’s life—that it would lead to
reopening of your favorite places and you would strut around with your socks on
thinking you were a dang superhero. It’s just like that, I tweeted, except the
fabric is in a different place. That’s the power that we each have when we
choose to mask up.
Recent studies have shown that if
80 percent of people wear masks that are 60 percent effective—yes, these
homemade masks; these awesome stylish homemade masks, I might add—we can stop
the spread of this virus as we get back into our lives and businesses reopen.
In fact, we see this playing out in Japan, which has long had a culture of
mask-wearing in public spaces which has largely controlled the COVID-19
outbreak while still keeping public spaces, businesses, and public transit
open. This social media challenge took off over the weekend. It has received
almost four-and-a-half thousand retweets and 20,000 likes and I spent all weekend
retweeting and sharing pictures of people showing off their masks from all over
the state—from Traverse City to Jackson, Grand Rapids to Detroit. A woman
shared an awesome mask that was blue buffalo plaid with little Upper Peninsulas
tossed in it. People shared University of Michigan and Michigan State
University masks and a couple shared a picture that showed that they are a
house divided and were wearing different masks, but that they are in this thing
together—and they noted that they will always be a house divided.
It’s so powerful and it’s so
simple, but it’s only as effective as the number of people who participate. We
are a team. And it’s something we can each do to control our own destiny to get
back out there safely to help our businesses and public spaces open and to keep
each other safe. So I invite all of my colleagues to join me in sharing our own
pictures so we can #MaskUpMichigan.
Senator Hollier’s statement is as
follows:
Every week, I come to this
chamber with the hope that we will come together to defeat COVID-19 as a whole
body, not just the southeast Michigan caucus, the northern Michigan, or the
western Michigan caucus. To that end, I left Lansing last week disappointed
because it seems that my colleagues on the other side of the aisle continue to
look for a way to pick a fight. On Thursday, I sat through a joint committee
meeting for more than four hours during which one of my colleagues in this
chamber stated, I am not Detroit. This came after the same individual had
previously suggested in a separate committee that we just build a wall around
southeast Michigan, one of the hardest-hit regions of our state affected by the
coronavirus. I just want to take a minute to talk about how dangerous,
irresponsible, and offensive this rhetoric is, and draw attention to the fact
that it’s analogous to a larger, ongoing problem.
This past weekend, a white woman
called the cops on a black man who was birdwatching in New York’s Central Park,
and a black man died from his injuries because of police violence—something
that continues to happen. Every week, every day, we hear that. We have to share
the names of people like George Floyd who died in police custody as people were
watching. Every day I go out for a run and look and exercise and do any of those
kind of things, someone tells me to be safe. Someone says, ‘I just want to make
sure you’re OK.’ That’s what this does. It is not the idea that you are going
to be the person who has your foot on someone’s neck. It’s not that
expectation. It’s that you say something or do something that makes people who
have nothing but hate and intolerance in their hearts feel a little bit more
comfortable doing the thing they wanted to do. That’s the difference. The
difference between this situation and many of those is that woman apologized.
She didn’t apologize because she had to; she did it because she knew if she
didn’t, she was going to lose her job. And she did. We live in an environment
where these things are coming up much more frequently. I ask you, because I
think most of you—all of you—have good-natured hearts and want to do the right
thing, and if there’s an issue, we can work through it. I ask that though we
call different places home, that we consider ourselves all Detroiters, that we
think about these things, and I bring this up in the context of Memorial Day.
Memorial Day was founded by
former slaves. They did so to recognize the people who died during the Civil
War. That was the beginning of Memorial Day. We didn’t get to have our ceremony
and our celebration this year, but it started with former slaves who were
saying thank you for fighting for our freedom. That’s what the Civil War was
about. It was about slavery; it was about citizenship; it was about our right
to belong in a world where I didn’t have that opportunity. Many of the members
sitting in this chamber would not have been able to do that. When we think
about Memorial Day, when we think about all the people we honor for their
sacrifice, I’d ask that you think about what that sacrifice really meant and
how we can play into it—how we can work together to do just that.
Sometime in the next few days,
the official coronavirus death count will likely exceed 100,000. The true count
is even higher though when we include people who had the virus but were not
diagnosed, as well as those who died for indirect reasons such as delayed
medical treatment for other illnesses. Either way, the toll is greater than the
combined death count from every war that the U.S. has fought in the past 60
years—Vietnam, Iraq, Iraq again, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. In Michigan alone,
as of Tuesday, May 26, the total COVID-19 death count was 5,266. In Detroit,
there were 1,326 deaths. In southwest Michigan, in the 21st District,
there were 51 deaths. Two different sides of the state; common theme of shared
lost lives. While people want to say we are not Detroit or something like that,
I sure hope folks will remember those who have died in Detroit, died in
Michigan, and across this country because the bottom line is that COVID‑19
is a fact. A lot like a war, every President—including this one—has said we are
at war, and when we are at war we make sacrifices of our inconveniences.
Mr. President, I’d ask that my
remarks be printed in the Journal and that my colleagues and I find ways to
work through this situation.
Senator
Irwin’s statement is as follows:
I
didn’t expect to be standing here giving this speech after the eloquent words
of my colleague from the 2nd District. I also didn’t expect to be making these
comments after the tragic death of Mr. Floyd in Minneapolis, or after a tragic
and horrifying incident that happened in my own community in Washtenaw County
this weekend. This is legislation that I’ve been working on for some time, and
so I wanted to alert my colleagues that, today on my desk, is a bill to require
enhanced police training.
My bill
will require that the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES)
include training on implicit bias, violence de-escalation, and mental health
screening in the basic police training package to get certified here in the
state of Michigan. Great police agencies across the state are already doing
this kind of training. They’re doing it internally in their departments because
they know that it decreases violence and negative interactions between the
police and the citizenry. They know that it enhances police work; but it’s not
part of our basic training package to get your MCOLES certification. I think we
ought to make it so. That’s why I’m introducing this legislation, and I ask for
your co-sponsorship because we know that police work is difficult. We know that
police officers are often out there making split-second decisions. These are
high stakes decisions in life-altering scenarios. And we also know that police
shootings decrease and officers report greater satisfaction and they report
that this type of training increases their confidence in being able to
deescalate potentially bad situations. We want our police to be equipped with
the tools to diffuse potentially violent situations and to protect and serve.
Since
2015, at least 77 individuals here in the state of Michigan have been fatally
shot by police officers. Since 2015, 77 of our residents in the state of
Michigan have been fatally shot by police officers. 50 percent of those
fatalities were people of color. One-third of those individuals had documented
mental health diagnoses. That’s why we need this training. So, we know right
now that people are struggling financially and, otherwise, tensions are very
high. We saw it this past weekend. Our people are calling out for justice. They
don’t want to see any more citizens shot and killed. We know we have a need in
our police training regime that we can fill here in this Legislature and our
citizens are calling on us to address this injustice and tell our people it’s
safe to go jogging. It’s safe to go to the park. It’s safe to drive to work.
And, if you do have an interaction with the police, it’s safe to have that
interaction. We need to give our citizens that confidence. So I ask for your
co-sponsorship today, and I hope that my colleagues will move this bill
forward. It’s something that we need before this summer. It’s something that
we’ve badly needed in this state for a long time and I hope that we can get
some uptake on this idea of enhancing our police training standards and
engaging the best practices that we know works to keep our people safe.
Senator McBroom’s statement is as
follows:
Mr. President, I’ve said here
before in recent days, I’ve got no problem with trying to work together. I
don’t have a problem with identifying as a Detroiter, and trying to recognize
their struggle, and answer the call for the help that they need. I’ve done that
before when asked, and I’ve asked them for help with issues in my district
before, and we’ve been able to do that work many times in the past.
But nobody denies what I stated
here a month ago: that if the roles were reversed, and the current situation
were in the Upper Peninsula, and Detroit had the Upper Peninsula’s situation,
nobody here would be tolerating the idea that we’re shutting down the whole
state because of a problem in the Upper Peninsula. It just would not be
acceptable to anyone in this body, it wouldn’t be acceptable to me, from the
Upper Peninsula. We continue to need to recognize the importance of a
regional approach and leadership that shows us what is being done and why it’s
being done. We’re supposedly on this team together, but the captain is not
sharing a plan. Where’s the timeline? Where are the metrics? Where is the hope
that doing certain actions like wearing a mask, is going to be rewarded with
something? No feedback. If I tell my children again, and again, and again, ‘Don’t
do this,’ and then walk away without ever giving an explanation to them, I can
really pretty much guarantee that eventually one of them is going to say, ‘You
know, maybe I’ll go try and play in the road for a while. Never hear about why
that’s a bad idea.’
Right now, our citizens are not
looking for understanding from the leadership about how tough it is to be
cooped up at home, with kids or without kids. Or how tough it is to not go
fishing, or not do the things they want to do. What they’re looking for is
understanding that they are losing everything. They stand to lose everything
they’ve worked so hard for, that they’ve dreamed about, that they desire for
their children to have. They’re looking for a leader that understands that, and
that government rules and regulations, and special plans that come out, are not
being tailored to fit their situation.
When the leadership says, ‘Oh,
well, they can just ignore these,’ or ‘We aren’t going to do those for this,’
or ‘We’ll suspend these until we have a better idea,’ that’s not giving our
people assurance of what they’re doing and it’s not giving them assurance of
what their leadership is doing. These delays that we currently have, they can’t
be tolerated. This is reminiscent of the intolerable acts that led our country
to being formed in the first place. And I am growing more and more disturbed by
how many calls I’m receiving from people in my communities, people who own
businesses, people who are elected leaders at the local level, people who run
our schools, our campgrounds, our businesses, even law enforcement who are
calling me, significantly concerned about the possibility of retribution from
this administration if they don’t toe the line—if they don’t walk the straight
and narrow. When a community calls me up and says, ‘We can’t tell from this new
executive order whether we can or can’t do this, and we see these people are doing
it,’ in this case campgrounds, specifically, does it apply to state campgrounds
or private campgrounds, or to city campgrounds, or to county campgrounds? And
they call me to say, ‘If we open up, could we potentially lose funding from
MEDC, or MDOT, or DNR?’ And I don’t know. I can’t answer that. Even when the
law enforcement is concerned about possible retribution from our state’s
government, we need to reconsider the course of action. We need to remember the
words that a government needs to fear its people, not the people fear its
government.
Senator Shirkey’s statement is as
follows:
Trust cannot exist without
honesty. At the end of last week the Governor directed her staff to reach out
to my office and claim that one of the Senators in this chamber reposted a
false story via social media. The Governor’s staff was emphatic that the post
was false and that it should be removed. The Governor’s request to remove this
post resulted in the calling-into-question the integrity of one of the members
of this chamber. Upon further follow-up, we learned the source of the story was
credible. We again reached out to the Governor and her staff, and again the
Governor directed her team to deny the story. The Governor lied. Not only did
she lie, but she directed her staff to lie on her behalf in order to cover up
her own lies. Yesterday, the Governor went in front of cameras and admitted to
the lie. She referenced the exchange as a failed joke. It would be nice if this
Governor was as quick to identify failed leadership. How can we trust the
Governor? How can the citizens of Michigan trust the Governor? What else is she
willing to lie about if she lied about putting a boat into water?
Announcements of Printing and Enrollment
The
Secretary announced that the following bills were printed and filed on
Thursday, May 21, and are available on the Michigan Legislature website:
Senate Bill Nos. 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941
Committee Reports
The Joint Select Committee on the COVID-19
Pandemic (HCR 20) submitted the following:
Meeting held on Thursday, May 21, 2020, at
2:00 p.m., Room 519, House Office Building
Present: Senators Nesbitt, LaSata,
Schmidt, Hertel and Hollier
Scheduled Meetings
Education
and Career Readiness -
Thursday, May 28, 12:30 p.m., Room 403, 4th Floor, Capitol Building (517)
373-5314
Finance
-
Thursday, May 28, 8:30 a.m., Harry T. Gast Appropriations Room, 3rd Floor,
Capitol Building (517) 373-5312
Regulatory
Reform -
Thursday, May 28, 2:30 p.m., Senate Hearing Room, Ground Floor, Boji Tower
(517) 373-5314
Senator
MacGregor moved that the Senate adjourn.
The
motion prevailed, the time being 12:08 p.m.
The
President, Lieutenant Governor Gilchrist, declared the Senate adjourned until
Thursday, May 28, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.
MARGARET O’BRIEN
Secretary of the Senate