LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN; ACCESS                                                        S.B. 213:

                                                                                 SUMMARY OF INTRODUCED BILL

                                                                                                         IN COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senate Bill 213 (as introduced 3-9-21)

Sponsor:  Senator Kimberly LaSata

Committee:  Health Policy and Human Services

 

Date Completed:  3-25-21

 


CONTENT

 

The bill would amend the Older Michiganians Act to do the following:

 

 --   Delete a provision specifying when the Michigan Long-Term Ombudsman and the local or regional long-term care ombudsman must be granted access to any long-term care facility.

 --   Specify that if a restriction were placed on the ability to visit a resident of a long-term care facility, and the restriction lasted long than seven days, the restriction would not apply to a representative of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program.

 --   Require a facility to make a good-faith effort to facilitate a virtual visit if a restriction or visitation prohibited a representative of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program from entering a long-term care facility.

 --   Modify the definition of "access".

 

The Act specifies that the Michigan Long-Term Care Ombudsman, the local or regional long-term care ombudsmen, and their trained volunteers must be granted access to any long-term care facility for the purpose of carrying out Section 6h of the Act (which prescribes the responsibilities of local or regional long-term ombudsman programs.)  

 

For the Michigan Long-Term Care Ombudsman and the local or regional long-term care ombudsmen, access must be allowed each day from 8 AM to 8 PM. For ombudsman-trained volunteers, access must be allowed to nursing homes during regular visiting hours each day as required by Section 20201(3)(b) of the Public Health Code. The bill would delete this provision.

 

Under the bill, if a restriction were placed on the ability to visit a resident of a long-term care facility, and that restriction lasted longer than seven days, that visitation restriction would not apply to a representative of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. A representative of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program would have to be allowed access to the long-term care facility to carry out the duties required under the Act.

 

If a restriction on visitation prohibited a representative of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program from entering a long-term care facility to carry out his or her duties, the facility would have to make a good-faith effort to facilitate a virtual visit, if necessary.

 

The Code defines "access" as the right to do all of the following:

 


 --    Seek consent from a resident to communicate privately and without restriction with that resident.

 --    Communicate privately and without restrictions with any resident who consents to communication.

 --    Observe all resident areas of the facility except the living area of any resident who protests the observation.

 

"Access" also means the right to enter any facility and identify himself or herself. The bill would delete this provision.

 

In addition to those rights currently prescribed under the definition of "access", under the bill, the term also would mean the right to do any of the following:

 

 --    Enter a long-term care facility, and identify himself or herself, at any time during that long-term care facility's regular business hours or regular visiting hours, and at any other time when access could be required by the circumstances to be investigated.

 --    Obtain the name and contact information of the resident's representative, if any, when needed to perform the functions and duties set forth in Section 6h.

 --    Review and, upon request, receive copies of all licensing and certification records maintained by the State with respect to long-term care facilities.

 

MCL 400.586i                                                        Legislative Analyst:  Stephen Jackson

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The bill would have no fiscal impact on State or local government.

 

                                                                                     Fiscal Analyst: Steve Angelotti

 

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.