SIGNATURE VERIFICATION TRAINING                                                             S.B. 308:

                                                                                 SUMMARY OF INTRODUCED BILL

                                                                                                         IN COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senate Bill 308 (as introduced 3-24-21)

Sponsor:  Senator Kevin Daley

Committee:  Elections

 

Date Completed:  5-5-21

 


CONTENT

 

The bill would amend the Michigan Election Law to require the Secretary of State (SOS) to establish and require signature verification training for all county, city, and township clerks and for all precinct inspectors that complied with any rules promulgated by the SOS for an objective signature verification process.

 

Under the Administrative Procedures Act, the SOS would have to promulgate rules that established an objective signature verification process that would have to be used in training all county, city and township clerks and all precinct inspectors. The objective signature verification process could not include a presumption regarding the validity of any signature that was to be verified.

 

MCL 168.31                                                                Legislative Analyst:  Dana Adams

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

There could be additional costs for the Department of State to promulgate rules to establish an objective signature verification process; however, those costs likely would be minimal and would be absorbed within the Department's annual appropriations. This bill also would require the Department to establish a signature verification training and require all county, city, township clerks, and all precinct inspectors to be trained in accordance with the promulgated rules. The Department likely would incur costs beyond current appropriations to develop the required signature verification trainings and training materials, along with the costs associated with providing the required trainings. The costs are indeterminate and would depend on the number of trainings ultimately required, the material costs for those trainings, as well as travel costs for staff associated with providing those trainings.

 

                                                                                      Fiscal Analyst:  Joe Carrasco

 

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.